The civil protest movement and week-long class boycott initiated by the Hong Kong Federation of Students and activist group Scholarism unexpectedly caused the Occupy Central with Love and Peace (和平佔中) campaign to start earlier than planned. The movement called on China’s National People’s Congress to revoke its political reform package for Hong Kong and reopen consultations on the measures.
In June, the People’s Republic of China State Council issued a “white paper” reiterating the “one country, two systems” (一國兩制) model it applies to the territory and reneging on the assurances made in the Sino-British Joint Declaration and Hong Kong’s Basic Law of “a high degree of autonomy” for Hong Kongers.
There are similarities between Hong Kong’s Occupy Central and Taiwan’s Sunflower movement. In both cases, the citizenry rose up against Beijing’s using the forging of closer economic and trade ties in the context of its political and economic rise to penetrate and dissipate Hong Kong’s right to autonomy, as well as Taiwan’s independence, autonomy and sovereign rights.
The Sunflower movement sought to attract support under the mantra “Today Hong Kong, Tomorrow Taiwan” and people have been watching what is going on in the territory with a heightened sense of alarm. The youth of Hong Kong have been courageously fighting to protect democratic values and the two societies — Taiwan and Hong Kong— are turning to each other for support. Undoubtedly, one of the most significant aspects in all this is the younger generation’s civic-mindedness and ability to organize and wield influence.
From these civic disobedience movements, it is evident that the younger generation is at the forefront, if not way ahead, of the curve compared with the wider public in Taiwan and Hong Kong. They are leading the way now and will become the cornerstone around which all else is built.
Just as Hong Kongers were taking to the streets to demand true universal suffrage, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) was reiterating Beijing’s commitment to “peaceful unification” (和平統一) and the “one country, two systems” policy, comments meant to assure and intimidate Taiwanese.
If Beijing can renege on assurances made in international pacts such as the Sino-British Joint Declaration and wantonly wrest away Hong Kongers’ right to autonomy — while rebuffing the UK with warnings to not interfere in its internal affairs — then the framework of “peaceful unification” and “one country, two systems” China advocates for addressing the Taiwan question is likely to be met with suspicion by the international community. In addition, this framework in no way complies with Taiwan’s political reality or its public’s will.
Recently, Beijing has been ratcheting up the political pressure in its interferences in Taiwan and Hong Kong. Internally, it is issuing ever harsher warnings to opposition and Xinjiang independence groups. Externally, it has been addressing Taiwan’s sovereignty and Hong Kong’s autonomy, taking advantage of the US and Europe being tied up with the Islamic State in the Middle East and the Ukraine crisis in Europe, leaving them unable to concentrate on East Asia.
Despite this, the younger generations in Taiwan and Hong Kong are standing up to the autocrats in Beijing and their strong-arm tactics. In both cases, it is the younger generation on the front line of defense, protecting incontrovertible values such as freedom and democracy, as well as their sovereignty. They are the pillar supporting the future of the societies in which they live.
In the long term, China’s leaders are set to lose the support of the “people,” the very group they have appealed to in the past when attempting to deal with Taiwanese and Hong Kong politics.
Chang Ching-yun is an assistant research fellow at the Taiwan Brain Trust.
Translated by Paul Cooper
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
As the war in Burma stretches into its 76th year, China continues to play both sides. Beijing backs the junta, which seized power in the 2021 coup, while also funding some of the resistance groups fighting the regime. Some suggest that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is hedging his bets, positioning China to side with the victors regardless of the outcome. However, a more accurate explanation is that China is acting pragmatically to safeguard its investments and ensure the steady flow of natural resources and energy for its economy. China’s primary interest is stability and supporting the junta initially seemed like the best
Numerous expert analyses characterize today’s US presidential election as a risk for Taiwan, given that the two major candidates, US Vice President Kamala Harris and former US president Donald Trump, are perceived to possess divergent foreign policy perspectives. If Harris is elected, many presume that the US would maintain its existing relationship with Taiwan, as established through the American Institute in Taiwan, and would continue to sell Taiwan weapons and equipment to help it defend itself against China. Under the administration of US President Joe Biden, whose political views Harris shares, the US on Oct. 25 authorized arms transfers to Taiwan, another