Hafiz Saeed, widely considered one of South Asia’s most dangerous militants, has no doubt who is to blame for devastating floods that have submerged sections of Pakistani countryside and claimed hundreds of lives.
“India irrigates its deserts and dumps extra water on Pakistan without any warning,” Saeed said as he surveyed a vast expanse of muddy water from a rescue boat just outside the central city of Multan, Pakistan.
“If we do not stop India now, Pakistan will continue to face this danger,” he said.
Illustration: Lance Liu
His comments would surprise few in India, where Saeed is suspected of helping mastermind the 2008 Mumbai massacre which killed 166 people, a few of them US citizens. Saeed, who also has a US$10 million US bounty on his head, denies involvement.
However, his presence in the flood-hit area is part of a push by Pakistani extremists, militants and organizations linked to them to fill the vacuum left by struggling local authorities and turn people against a neighbor long viewed with deep mistrust.
Water is an emotive issue in Pakistan, whose rapidly rising population depends on snow-fed Himalayan rivers for everything from drinking water to agriculture.
Many Pakistanis believe that India uses its upstream dams to manipulate how much water flows down to Pakistani wheat and cotton fields, with some describing it as a “water bomb” designed to weaken its neighbor.
There is no evidence to prove that and India has long dismissed such accusations as nonsense. Experts say this month’s floods, which also hit India’s part of the disputed Kashmir region, were caused by the sheer volume of rainfall.
In fact, some Pakistanis accuse their own government of failing to invest in dams and other infrastructure needed to regulate water levels through wet and dry seasons.
However, others agree with the narrative pushed by Saeed and Syed Salahuddin, head of the militant anti-Indian Hizbul Mujahideen group and also one of India’s most-wanted men.
“India wants to turn Pakistan into an arid desert,” Salahuddin told reporters in a telephone interview, describing another scenario feared by some Pakistanis — that India will cut off supplies of water in times of shortage.
“If this continues, a new jihad will begin. Our fighters and all of Pakistan’s fighters are ready to avenge Indian brutality in whatever form.”
Saeed’s charity, Jamaat-ud-Dawa (JuD), has sent hundreds of workers to areas of Pakistan worst affected by the floods, where they distribute food and medicine at the same time as spreading the organization’s hardline ideology against India.
JuD is believed by many experts to be a front for Lashkar-e-Taiba, the militant group which India says carried out the Mumbai attack. Saeed was a cofounder of Lashkar-e-Taiba, but he has played down his links to the group in recent years.
“This is a premeditated plan by India to make Pakistan suffer,” said Abdur Rauf, who has worked as a JuD volunteer for 16 years, as he prepared to distribute medicine and syringes at a relief camp near Multan.
“Do not be fooled. This water bomb is no different from the atom bomb. It is worse,” he said.
Officials in India’s water resources ministry this week declined to respond to charges of “water terrorism,” saying the charges were being stoked by militants, not the Pakistani government.
Much of the Indian-held side of Kashmir has also been hit by flooding, the worst in that region for more than a century, and officials have put the death toll there at more than 200.
However, in a nation rife with conspiracy theories, large numbers of Pakistanis buy into the idea of sabotage.
“This is not a mistake: this is a deliberate act to destroy Pakistan and make its people suffer,” farmer Syed Ali said as he looked at the murky waters covering his village of Sher Shah in central Pakistan.
Disagreement over how to share the waters of the Indus River, which flows from India into Pakistan, has dogged the nuclear-armed rivals since independence in 1947.
They have fought two of their three wars over the disputed Himalayan territory of Kashmir and observers are worried that the next conflict could be over water.
The lives of more than 2 million people were affected by this month’s floods in Pakistan, with more than 300 killed.
Some Pakistanis are critical of their government, saying the mass devastation caused by the latest floods was a result of Pakistan’s own inefficiencies.
“Some people will say India released the waters,” former Pakistani prime minister Yousaf Raza Gillani said. “However, my question is: even if there was a timely warning from India that this was about to happen, would we have heeded it? Would this government have taken the right steps? I doubt it.”
Husain Haqqani, a former Pakistan ambassador to the US and now a director at the Hudson Institute in Washington, said that water issues are being exploited to keep relations tense between the two countries.
“The Pakistani militants’ claims about floods in Pakistan being the result of India releasing torrents of water are downright absurd,” he said. “It is part of propaganda rooted in the belief that Pakistanis must be made to see India as their permanent enemy. Blaming India also covers up for Pakistan’s own failure in water management.”
Disputes over water-sharing are a global phenomenon, exacerbated by rapidly growing populations and increasingly unpredictable climate patterns.
In South Asia, home to a fifth of humanity, the problem is particularly acute.
“Regional flooding in South Asia is certainly linked to climate change effects. In recent years there has been major glacial recession on Pakistani mountains, and monsoon rains have been unusually and even unprecedentedly intense,” Michael Kugelman at the Woodrow Wilson International Center said.
“At the same time, I would argue that ... human-made actions are making things even worse. Deforestation in Pakistan, for example, has caused floodwaters to rage even more,” he said.
The region’s three major rivers — the Indus, the Ganges and the Brahmaputra — sustain both nations’ breadbasket states and many of their major cities, including New Delhi and Islamabad.
In Pakistan, agriculture contributes to about a quarter of GDP, and the nation still relies on a network of irrigation canals built by the British.
Hoping to resolve the issue once and for all, the two nations signed the Indus Water Treaty in 1960, but India’s ambitious irrigation plans and construction of thousands of upstream dams has continued to irk Pakistan.
India says its use of upstream water is strictly in line with the 1960 agreement.
According to a 2012 Indian government report, the country operates 4,846 dams in the region — a huge number compared with just a few dozen on the Pakistani side of the disputed border.
“We cannot blame India for our own mistakes,” said Malik Abdul Ghaffar Dogar, a ruling party legislator from Multan.
“We turn every dam project into a political deadlock and a stick to beat our political opponents with, but the truth is this country needs dams and it is just not building any,” the legislator said.
French firm DCI-DESCO in April won a bid to upgrade Taiwan’s Lafayette frigates, which has strained ties between China and France. In 1991, France sold Taiwan six Lafayette frigates and in 1992 sold it 60 Mirage 2000 fighter jets. To prevent arms sales between the nations, China negotiated an agreement with France and in 1994 in a joint statement, France promised that there would be no future arms sales to Taiwan. From China’s point of view, the DCI-DESCO deal constitutes a breach of the agreement, but the French stance is that it is not selling Taiwan new weapons, but instead providing a
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in her inaugural address on May 20 firmly said: “We will not accept the Beijing authorities’ use of ‘one country, two systems’ to downgrade Taiwan and undermine the cross-strait status quo.” The Chinese government was not too happy, and later that day, an opinion piece on the Web site of China’s state broadcaster China Central Television said: “While Tsai’s first inaugural address four years ago was read by Beijing as an ‘unfinished answer sheet,’ the one she presented this time was even more below-par.” Speaking to the China Review News Agency, Shanghai Institutes for International Studies vice president
The COVID-19 pandemic continues to wreak havoc worldwide. Despite countries being under pressure economically and from the novel coronavirus, China’s National People’s Congress last month passed national security legislation for Hong Kong, a decision that has shocked the world. Let there be no doubt: This move is the beginning of the end of China’s plans for “one country, two systems” in Hong Kong and Taiwan. Proposed amendments to extradition laws last year ignited massive protests in Hong Kong, with millions of participants, shocking the world and making confrontation between government forces and those who opposed the change a permanent part of Hong
Protecting domestic workers Ms Heidi Chang’s (張姮燕) article (“Employers need protections too,” May 24, page 6) made the case that “migrant workers’” rights had improved in Taiwan, but employers’ rights had not, going so far as to complain that all employers are treated equally under the law — as though this was not how the law was supposed to work. The truth is that the rights of foreign blue-collar workers have still not caught up with the rights their employers have always enjoyed. This segment of the foreign community in Taiwan is more likely than other groups to encounter abuse. Recently, a care