Less than one year after the industrial starch and adulterated oil cases sparked a nationwide food scare, a new tainted oil scandal has hit consumers at a time when the public prepare to eat mooncakes and barbecue with family or friends in celebration of the Mid-Autumn Festival.
Despite the rise of public attention to food safety and the authorities’ efforts to improve the quality of food manufacturing, the new scandal shows that there is still not enough being done to eliminate lawbreaking production lines.
More than 1,000 companies have reportedly purchased tainted lard oil products from manufacturer Chang Guann Co, directly or otherwise, with dissatisfied consumers returning goods and demanding refunds.
A number of well-known manufacturers, including Wei Chuan Foods Corp, Chi Mei Frozen Food Co and Sheng Hsiang Jen Foods Co, as well as some of the best-known bakeries, such as Yu Jen Jai and Lee Hu, have cried foul over the government’s Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) certification system, because they have been placing orders with Chang Guann, a GMP-certified food manufacturer.
Nevertheless, how can those companies claim to be victims if they have not bothered to make on-site inspections at their suppliers’ production facilities? Make no mistake: It is simply an excuse for those companies to avoid being blamed by the public and penalized by the authorities. Stating publicly their intentions to demand huge compensation from Chang Guann is nothing but a smokescreen to cover their negligence about the quality of the ingredients they use.
Just as with the di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, or DEHP, scandal in 2011, when plasticizers were found to have been used to produce food and beverages, and the adulterated cooking oil scandal last year, when so-called “pure oil products” from several local firms were found to have mixed premium olive and grapeseed oils with less expensive cottonseed oil, the government said it would get tough on violators and asked all companies involved to pull questionable products off the shelves.
However, many of those products — ranging from numerous fried snacks cooked using the tainted oil in night markets nationwide, to the tortilla-like wrap used in dan bing (egg pancakes) at the Good Morning breakfast chain and zongzi (glutinous rice dumplings) made by Black Bridge Foods, along with another 100 or more food items — were consumed long ago. Government officials said the health impact would be limited, but the damage is already done.
The loophole allowing food manufacturers to cut corners and companies to neglect their quality control duties exists because the current penalties are too lax. The latest scandal has prompted the Consumers’ Foundation and food experts to call on the government to revise the laws and maximize the penalties for breaking the law. The government must act on this plea or else its efforts to fight adulterated products will remain ineffective.
There has been a new vigilance in prosecuting careless food manufacturers, but this scandal has again damaged the nation’s international credibility. GMP certification or any other form of self-imposed measures in the food industry are not sufficient to ensure food safety.
Legislators and government officials must make the necessary law changes and enforce heavy punishments to deter lawbreakers, enhance the public’s eroding confidence in food authorities and rebuild the nation’s reputation.
Oppression is painful, and not being able to express it increases the pain 10-fold. This level of pain is something that Uighurs, Tibetans and Mongolians understand all too well. A question often posed to Uighurs in the international arena is: “You say you are facing genocide, but why don’t we see corpses, like in Rwanda and in Bosnia?” If you were a Uighur, what would you say? What if you replied: “The source of the problem is your lack of vision. It’s an indication of your weakness and China’s strength, and it is not a matter of our sincerity.” Such a harsh response would
Double Ten Day, Oct. 10 every year, is an important day for Taiwan, as it marks the Republic of China’s (ROC) National Day. Major holidays are usually a time for celebration and commemorative activities, but among all the clamor and excitement, Double Ten reflects one essential fact: that Taiwan is still not a normalized society. As usual, there was a large parade in front of the Presidential Office Building, displaying to the world Taiwan’s social diversity and its soft and hard power, and President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) gave an address, relaying her message to the nation and to the world, while the
President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) Double Ten National Day address has attracted a great deal of analysis and many different interpretations. One core question is why Tsai chose this occasion to discuss Taiwan’s national status. What was her main motive and what effect did she intend to have? These are issues that clearly need further clarification. The section of Tsai’s speech that attracted the most attention internationally was, not surprisingly, the part where she laid out “four commitments” that she said should serve as common ground for all Taiwanese, regardless of political affiliation. The commitments were to liberal democracy and constitutional government; that the
Ever since former Kaohsiung mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) was recalled last year, “Han fans,” as well as the KMT hierarchy, have made pro-Taiwan lawmakers their enemy No. 1, and Taiwan Statebuilding Party Legislator Chen Po-wei (陳柏惟) has been on top of that list (“Recall part of ‘generational war’: expert,” Oct. 19, page 3). Chen has always been one of Han’s harshest critics, and Han fans have vowed revenge. Former legislators Yen Kuan-hen (顏寬恆) and Yen Ching-piao (顏清標), being such sore losers, were not amused about losing to Chen democratically and have amassed significant resources backed by