Housing prices in Taiwan have now reached ridiculously high levels.
Last year, in a situation that should have been impossible given the objective conditions, the housing price-to-income ratio in Taipei was the highest in the world, although it has recently dropped to second place.
Such abnormal housing price growth is normally the result of two main factors: speculation and government policy, both of which affect the other.
Taipei’s population density is far lower than Seoul’s and per capita GDP for the two countries is comparable. Still, the home price-to-income ratio in Seoul is 9.16, far lower than Taipei’s 15.01.
Last year, housing transactions in Taipei decreased by 30 percent compared with 2010, while prices increased by a huge 30 percent — despite vacancies in Taipei and New Taipei City amounting to about 187,600 apartments. This situation is clear evidence of speculation.
When then-South Korean president Roh Moo-hyun proposed a real-estate capital gains tax in 2006, he made it clear that he was declaring war on real-estate speculation.
With Taiwan’s housing price-to-income ratio among the highest in the world, if Taiwanese do not declare a war on speculation, who will?
When the government announces its policies to combat high housing prices, what it is most concerned about is the effect of these policies on economic growth.
There is a wealth of studies showing that real-estate prices are not the driving force behind economic growth, that they will not have much of a follow-up effect on the economy and that they will not stimulate other industries.
On the contrary, real-estate industry growth can easily spin out of control and develop into a bubble, and indeed has had an effect on many financial crises.
However, even if it does not create a crisis, the excessive concentration of resources in real estate will have a negative effect on other industries, which can lose some of their international competitiveness as a result.
Consider South Korea as a prime example. In 2006, South Korea introduced a 30 percent capital gains tax on sales of second or third properties, which was increased to 50 and 60 percent respectively in 2007. From October 2006 to May 2007, housing price changes in South Korea fell from an increase of 3.8 percent to a decline of 0.4 percent, while economic growth for 2007 remained high at 5.2 percent.
In Taiwan, the low housing transaction volume in Taipei demonstrates that prices in the real-estate market are controlled by a minority. Falling prices will not have any overall effect on the economy and this offers a great opportunity for the government to take action in its fight against high housing prices.
Countries around the world treat soaring housing prices as an evil and try to come up with different measures to combat such developments.
Germany has even made housing speculation a criminal offense. Article 251 in Taiwan’s Criminal Code criminalizes speculation in grain, agricultural products and other necessary foods and beverages, but does not include housing, which is another necessity. This is beyond comprehension.
The unreasonable growth in housing prices results only in quickly expanding sales for the real-estate industry.
This does not do much to drive growth in other industries, and the speculative atmosphere — which will overtake investment — will only aggravate the consistently increasing wealth gap, which in its turn will have a tremendous negative effect on the economic wealth of the public.
Housing should be treated as a public welfare issue rather than an investment, and the government’s housing policies should give priority to maintaining stable prices, as with other necessities, rather than striving for high growth and returns on investment.
Chao Wen-heng is an associate research fellow at the Taiwan Institute of Economic Research.
Translated by Perry Svensson
The US Department of Defense recently released this year’s “Report on Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China.” This annual report provides a comprehensive overview of China’s military capabilities, strategic objectives and evolving global ambitions. Taiwan features prominently in this year’s report, as capturing the nation remains central to Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) vision of the “great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation,” a goal he has set for 2049. The report underscores Taiwan’s critical role in China’s long-term strategy, highlighting its significance as a geopolitical flashpoint and a key target in China’s quest to assert dominance
The National Development Council (NDC) on Wednesday last week launched a six-month “digital nomad visitor visa” program, the Central News Agency (CNA) reported on Monday. The new visa is for foreign nationals from Taiwan’s list of visa-exempt countries who meet financial eligibility criteria and provide proof of work contracts, but it is not clear how it differs from other visitor visas for nationals of those countries, CNA wrote. The NDC last year said that it hoped to attract 100,000 “digital nomads,” according to the report. Interest in working remotely from abroad has significantly increased in recent years following improvements in
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of