Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) was on Wednesday summoned by the Taipei District Court in a civil suit of attempted murder related to the forced eviction of Sunflower movement activists from the Executive Yuan compound in Taipei in March, making him the first premier in the nation’s history accused of such a criminal act.
Granted, the case is a private prosecution, meaning that Jiang has not been indicted and that his court appearance was merely part of preliminary proceedings allowing the judges to hear his version of events before deciding whether the accusation levied against him by 23 protesters constitutes a valid case for a follow-up trial.
The court’s decision that the accusers’ suit warrants a closer look deserves acknowledgement, due to the intense pressure it must have had to sustain in opting to summon the nation’s highest administrative official as a defendant in an attempted murder case.
The violent nature of the crackdown that resulted in bloodshed as student protesters were evicted from the Executive Yuan compound overnight on March 23 makes the event a horrific memory. Pictures and video footage taken at the site show many of those who took part in the brief seizure of the building being beaten by riot police, with several sustaining injuries to the head. One police officer was captured on film using a baton to hit a protester twice on the head while the man was already on the ground. Another man was documented having a seizure after being hit on the head by an officer, and there were also scenes of police using their shields to hit protesters’ ankles.
While all these appalling images seemingly suggested a confrontation of “police versus the public,” the reality is that both the police and the protesters were victims.
First, the student-led protesters did not storm the Executive Yuan compound for no reason. President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration induced them to do so after time and again showing a lack of sincerity in responding to their demands to renegotiate or rescind the service trade pact and enhance legislative oversight of cross-strait negotiations and treaties.
Besides, not every police officer assaulted unarmed protesters with batons and 5kg shields during the dispersal — and those who did ought to own up to their actions and shoulder the legal responsibility for their behavior. The truth is that Jiang is obligated to explain the events that transpired through the chain of command that culminated in the crackdown.
National Police Agency Director-General Wang Cho-chiun (王卓鈞) told a legislative committee meeting on March 26 that the premier ordered the eviction by telephone at 7:30pm on March 23. Jiang should therefore be held accountable for the result of the directive he handed out.
However, the Executive Yuan yesterday argued that Jiang did not issue such an instruction. Many issues therefore require further clarification. For example, were the police officers’ actions disproportionate? Did the state authorities abuse their power? Who exactly handed down the order for the forced eviction of the protesters?
It is a national shame that the police confronted unarmed protesters with such brutal force. If the court finds that the allegations made against the premier constitute a valid case, that would be an important milestone in the nation’s democratic development.
Chinese state-owned companies COSCO Shipping Corporation and China Merchants have a 30 percent stake in Kaohsiung Port’s Kao Ming Container Terminal (Terminal No. 6) and COSCO leases Berths 65 and 66. It is extremely dangerous to allow Chinese companies or state-owned companies to operate critical infrastructure. Deterrence theorists are familiar with the concepts of deterrence “by punishment” and “by denial.” Deterrence by punishment threatens an aggressor with prohibitive costs (like retaliation or sanctions) that outweigh the benefits of their action, while deterrence by denial aims to make an attack so difficult that it becomes pointless. Elbridge Colby, currently serving as the Under
Ho Ying-lu (何鷹鷺), a Chinese spouse who was a member of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Central Standing Committee, on Wednesday last week resigned from the KMT, accusing the party of failing to clarify its “one China” policy. In a video released in October, Ho, wearing a T-shirt featuring a portrait of Mao Zedong (毛澤東), said she hoped that Taiwan would “soon return to the embrace of the motherland” and “quickly unify — that is my purpose and my responsibility.” The KMT’s Disciplinary Committee on Nov. 19 announced that Ho had been suspended from her position on the committee, although she was
The Ministry of the Interior on Thursday last week said it ordered Internet service providers to block access to Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu (小紅書, also known as RedNote in English) for a year, citing security risks and more than 1,700 alleged fraud cases on the platform since last year. The order took effect immediately, abruptly affecting more than 3 million users in Taiwan, and sparked discussions among politicians, online influencers and the public. The platform is often described as China’s version of Instagram or Pinterest, combining visual social media with e-commerce, and its users are predominantly young urban women,
Honduras’ election has opened a diplomatic moment that Taiwan cannot afford to ignore. Tegucigalpa’s 2023 decision to switch recognition from Taiwan to Beijing was a setback, but it is not irreversible. The incoming government in Honduras faces the same stubborn challenges that made China’s sweeping promises appealing in the first place — migration pressures, energy insecurity and limited foreign investment. Taiwan has an opportunity to make a unique offer consisting of credit lines and export credit. The offer should be strategic, well-structured, and large enough to command the attention of Honduras and other nations in the Western hemisphere. Taiwan’s development assistance has
RSS