The Gaza-based interior ministry advises its supporters in a YouTube video that whenever talking about the dead, “always add ‘an innocent citizen.’” In Israel, the message is quite different: Those same victims are described as “human shields” sacrificed by the “heartless” Hamas “terrorists” that rule Gaza.
Recently, thousands of Israeli mobile phone users received a text message that bragged: “We forced you to hide in shelters like mice,” while Israelis trade cartoons and satirical videos — one intersperses an Arab political speech with a slobbering goat, another replaces the heads of Palestinian fighters with Angry Birds characters. Hamas and the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) are also circulating remarkably similar video clips of exploding buildings with thundering soundtracks that evoke Hollywood thrillers.
“Time for revenge has arrived,” one Hamas video says in Hebrew.
Illustration: Mountain People
An Israeli one, making fun of Palestinian accents, says: “Balestine, listen, this is a message to Gaza, we are killing Gaza.”
“The IDF is strong! Gaza is weak,” it adds.
The ground war between Israel and Hamas has intensified again with many more civilians and soldiers dying, but that is only one battlefield. Another, the clash of narratives, the struggle for domestic and international opinion, is seen by both sides to have long-term stakes as high and perhaps even more lasting than combat on the ground.
Propaganda wars have unfolded alongside the battlefield for generations, but analysts say the latest flare-up between Israel and the Gaza Strip has brought a new level of dehumanizing, hateful language and a muddying of official talking points with incendiary threats, as social media broadcast an explosion of voices, an onslaught of unreliable information and creative mash-ups of pop-culture icons with war imagery.
The abduction and murder of teenagers that helped set the stage for the latest escalation had also shown a devolution from a political struggle to a kind of personal blood feud that both fuels and is fueled by the mocking, hateful comments flying in both directions, analysts say.
Israeli novelist Etgar Keret said he has been troubled by some of the terms favored by journalists, politicians and even friends in Tel Aviv.
There is no Hebrew word for “assassination,” so killings of Hamas operatives are described with a phrase meaning “focused obstruction,” Keret said.
Instead of “civilians,” slain children and women are sometimes called “uninvolved,” he added.
“There’s something about this ‘uninvolved,’ there’s something passive about it,” Keret said. “You admit that he is not somebody who is trying to destroy you, but you don’t give him any other identification. It was not a child who wanted to learn how to play the piano, it was just somebody who didn’t shoot at us.”
There is a long history of such euphemisms. The journalist Amos Elon called it “word laundry,” and David Grossman explored the phenomenon in The Yellow Wind, his 1987 study of Palestinian life under Israeli occupation.
“A society in crisis forges for itself a new vocabulary,” he wrote, using “words that no longer describe reality, but attempt, instead, to conceal it.”
Dalia Gavriely-Nuri, an expert in the discourse of war who is affiliated with universities in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv, said that the Hebrew name for the current operation translates as “strong cliff” — a reference to nature, like the names of 35 percent of Israeli military campaigns since the state’s establishment in 1948, according to her research.
“Using natural forces, it removes the responsibility of leaders, of citizens,” Gavriely-Nuri said. “Nobody is responsible when you are sitting under, let’s say, a tsunami or earthquake. This is a psychological process that helps the people that are involved in a conflict or an operation to survive the situation.”
Social media have put the propaganda war on steroids.
“You’re seeing anger and frustration, you’re seeing sorrow and empathy, and you’re also seeing a wide currency of videos, photos, infographics, emergent hashtags, memes,” said William Youmans, a professor of media and public affairs at George Washington University, who specializes in the Middle East.
“You read over-triumphalist accounts. It can almost sound like they’re rooting for different sports teams and cheering their side on. That’s very different from the actual suffering that’s going on,” Youmans said.
Palestinian supporters traced to Israeli teenagers countless posts on Twitter demanding death to all Arabs. Israel’s backers collect comparisons of their leadership to Nazis. The medium gives a megaphone to radical extremists and also pushes officialdom to casual shorthand that can be cutting.
Both sides are organized and active, though the hashtag #GazaUnderAttack has been used in nearly 4 million Twitter posts, compared with 170,000 for #Israel
UnderFire, according to Topsy, a social-media search engine.
Youmans attributed that to broader sympathy for Palestinians, but also said Israel has a more coherent campaign that is powered by institutions.
It was during Israel’s last ground invasion of Gaza, in 2009, that a soldier in the military’s public affairs unit, Aliza Landes, paid for a WordPress account on her own credit card and started posting battle footage on YouTube because she realized “if you’re not going to put it out there, you’re not going to be part of the conversation.”
Now, there are 40 people in the interactive unit of the Israel Defense Forces, including videographers, animators, graphic artists and computer programmers, pumping out missives in six languages, on many platforms, in a tone much punchier than the typical press release.
“Israel uses the Iron Dome to protect its civilians,” it said on Twitter over the weekend. “Hamas uses civilians to protect its rockets.”
Hamas has also tried to harness social media, though its categorization as a terror group by the US and other Western states has led Facebook and Twitter to block some official accounts. The Hebrew Twitter feed of its military wing had a polite, amusing exchange the other day with Israelis correcting its grammar.
A “Dos and Don’ts” YouTube video produced by Hamas, which the Times of Israel wrote about earlier this month, shed some light on the Palestinian strategy. Don’t post footage of rockets being launched from cities, it warned, lest Israel uses it to justify strikes on populated areas. Don’t publish close-ups of masked gunmen, or your page can be shut down for inciting violence. Do start with “in response to the cruel Israeli assault,” it advised. “No harm in publishing the pictures of casualties.”
Palestinian activists have complained about dehumanizing language used by Israeli leaders. The night the bodies of three kidnapped teenagers were found, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called their killers “beasts.”
Ayelet Shaked, a right-wing member of parliament, posted on Facebook a 2002 article that called the whole Palestinian people “the enemy,” and described so-called martyrs as “snakes” and suggested their mothers should be murdered.
“In the past when people said racist things, we found that many officials denounced that. This time we found silence,” said Hassan Jabareen, director of Adalah, a legal center for Arab rights in Israel.
Calls to “kill all Arabs” used to come from extremist groups defined by Israeli law as terrorist, but “today you hear it everywhere,” Jabareen said.
“Many, many Arabs feel that it’s not safe today to walk freely in Jewish cities or in a mixed city because of this phenomenon,” he added.
On Israeli news programs, discussion of the dead is often in a diplomatic context — how many casualties before the world demands a halt to hostilities — rather than a more human, moral one.
“I don’t want to call it dehumanization, because that’s a very loaded word — it’s a benumbing: people are just, they don’t show it, but they’re in a daze,” said Michael Oren, a historian and former Israeli ambassador to Washington who has spent several hours daily on Israeli and international television.
“In classic dehumanization scenarios, whether in Nazi Germany or in Rwanda before the genocide, you refer to the enemy as rats and cockroaches, and that enables you to kill them on a large scale,” Oren said. “We’re not calling Palestinians cockroaches.”
Still, “it’s very difficult to feel compassion for the other when you have rockets aimed at your family,” he added.
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
An elderly mother and her daughter were found dead in Kaohsiung after having not been seen for several days, discovered only when a foul odor began to spread and drew neighbors’ attention. There have been many similar cases, but it is particularly troubling that some of the victims were excluded from the social welfare safety net because they did not meet eligibility criteria. According to media reports, the middle-aged daughter had sought help from the local borough warden. Although the warden did step in, many services were unavailable without out-of-pocket payments due to issues with eligibility, leaving the warden’s hands
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Monday announced that she would dissolve parliament on Friday. Although the snap election on Feb. 8 might appear to be a domestic affair, it would have real implications for Taiwan and regional security. Whether the Takaichi-led coalition can advance a stronger security policy lies in not just gaining enough seats in parliament to pass legislation, but also in a public mandate to push forward reforms to upgrade the Japanese military. As one of Taiwan’s closest neighbors, a boost in Japan’s defense capabilities would serve as a strong deterrent to China in acting unilaterally in the
Taiwan last week finally reached a trade agreement with the US, reducing tariffs on Taiwanese goods to 15 percent, without stacking them on existing levies, from the 20 percent rate announced by US President Donald Trump’s administration in August last year. Taiwan also became the first country to secure most-favored-nation treatment for semiconductor and related suppliers under Section 232 of the US Trade Expansion Act. In return, Taiwanese chipmakers, electronics manufacturing service providers and other technology companies would invest US$250 billion in the US, while the government would provide credit guarantees of up to US$250 billion to support Taiwanese firms
RSS