When Takeshi Ishida was drafted into the Japanese military in 1943, he believed he was fighting a just war to liberate Asia from Western colonialism. It was only after taking part in daily exercises in which he was trained to kill that Ishida began to question Japanese militarism.
When the full horror of Japan’s wartime atrocities became apparent in the aftermath of its surrender, Ishida devoted himself to defending the pacifist constitution imposed on the country by victorious US occupation authorities.
Now, the former Imperial Japanese Army officer is consumed with fear that young Japanese will again be sent to fight overseas, following the most dramatic shift in the country’s defense policy for almost 70 years.
On Tuesday, conservative Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and his Cabinet agreed to lift the longstanding ban on Japan’s troops engaging in combat overseas, a move Ishida believes could once again drag his country into a reckless war.
“What Abe is doing is destroying the principles of our pacifist constitution,” Ishida, a professor emeritus at Tokyo University, told The Guardian. “Not killing anyone abroad is, in a sense, a precious part of our heritage. Why should we have to throw it away on the orders of one man rather than through the will of the people?”
Ishida, 91, believes that Japan’s US-authored constitution is at the heart of its postwar peace.
“I came to realize that I had been indoctrinated to become a militaristic youth,” he said. “As someone who felt for a while that he had lost his identity, the peace constitution was a great encouragement.”
That tradition of pacifism is in danger of being abandoned as Abe moves to reinterpret the constitution and lift the self-imposed ban on collective defense, or coming to the aid of an ally under attack.
Japan will not attempt to revise its constitution outright — an option Abe apparently abandoned after accepting that he would not win the necessary majorities in parliament and in a nationwide referendum — but will reinterpret the “pacifist” Article 9, which prohibits the threat or use of force as a means of settling international disputes.
The change, which is expected to be approved by parliament — where Abe’s Liberal Democratic Party and its junior coalition partner hold majorities — would allow Tokyo to exercise collective self-defense for the first time since the end of World War II.
In practical terms, armed troops could take part in UN peacekeeping operations or be dispatched to “gray zone” emergencies that have not developed into full-blown conflict.
Critics say the most troubling aspect of all is that the Japanese military could come to the aid of an ally, leaving open the possibility that Tokyo could be dragged into war at Washington’s behest.
Abe has made building a better equipped, more robust military a cornerstone of his second term as prime minister. As a prominent figure among conservative politicians who want to change the country’s view of its wartime record, he says the current constitution compromises Japan’s ability to defend itself and its allies amid Chinese military aggression and North Korea’s nuclear weapons program.
In a televised address on Tuesday, Abe said Japan would remain a pacifist state and denied that the new policy would mean sending troops into combat zones. Instead, he said it would offer better protection to Japanese. The country’s navy, for example, would be able to help protect US warships that were fighting to defend the country, he said.
“This is for the happiness of the Japanese people,” Abe said. “Japan’s status as a peaceful country will not change.”
According to a Cabinet document on the change, Tokyo would only take action if “a country’s existence is threatened, and there are clear dangers that the people’s right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness would be overturned” by an armed attack on the nation or on “countries with close ties.”
However, neighboring countries that were victims of Japanese militarism in the first half of the 20th century have warned Tokyo against abandoning its pacifist principles.
“Beijing opposes Japan’s act of hyping the China threat,” Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Hong Lei (洪磊) told reporters in Beijing. “It’s only natural for us to wonder if Japan is going to leave the path of peaceful development that it has long been pursuing.”
In Seoul, South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Noh Kwang-il said: “Our position is that the discussions should be held on the basis of the pacifist constitution, dispelling concerns among neighborhood countries stemming from history and into a direction of contributing to peace and stability in the region.”
Abe’s push to remove constitutional restraints on the military has also attracted opposition in Japan. About 10,000 people demonstrated outside his official residence on Monday evening, followed by more similar protests the next day.
“The current constitution is the result of the sacrifice of more than 3 million Japanese and more than 20 million Asian victims of war,” 74-year-old protester Yoshihiko Murata said. “We should value it more.”
Several recent opinion polls show most voters oppose the lifting of the ban on collective self-defense.
Supporters of the change said Japan is simply adopting the same defense policy as other liberal democracies at a time of increasing uncertainty in the Asia-Pacific rgion.
“What we are trying to do now is to play a more proactive role in cooperating with regional countries in setting up a framework to protect the peace and stability of the region,” Takeshi Iwaya, who heads the Liberal Democratic Party’s security research commission, told The Associated Press.
Ishida said the effective removal of the last significant constraint on Japan’s military had come at a dangerous time for the region, citing Abe’s visit to Yasukuni Shrine as part of an attempt to foment tension with China and South Korea.
The rightward shift under Abe, including the recent passage of a state secrets law, has rekindled uncomfortable memories for a man drafted to fight in a war he now believes was tragically misguided.
“The state secrets law immediately reminded me of the peace preservation law in 1928, which made it much easier to arrest people and suppress information,” Ishida said. “Now we have this new interpretation of Article 9 of the constitution that would allow Japanese forces to fight overseas. I am worried that history is repeating itself.”
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
RSS