There is a saying that having money does not make up for stupidity. However, businesspeople who work hard to make money are still admirable.
In his autobiography, one of the founders of modern Japan, Yukichi Fukuzawa, said that the glorious victories of armies, the rapid rise to power of politicians and the way wealthy people accumulate money are the achievements of a lifetime of work. While on the surface such things may seem vulgar, they are actually very worthy of appreciation and should not be laughed at.
However, it is totally unacceptable when businesspeople start making irresponsible remarks about politics and attack democracy out of selfish self-interest. It is also unacceptable to show no regard for the law or the Constitution and play along with political lies while agreeing with ideas that contravene human rights and making political threats in the name of economics.
This logic applies to what we see happening in Taiwan now, with the government pushing the phony idea of the so-called “1992 consensus.” It is evident in the way businesspeople deny that violent acts happened in Tiananmen Square in China in 1989, when they say Taiwan will collapse without the cross-strait service trade agreement, and when they act as if democracy is worth nothing and constantly sing the praises of China.
Businesspeople have long been involved in anti-democratic movements. During the Nazi era, a painting of US industrialist Henry Ford hung in the headquarters of the Nazi party in Munich. Ford, who amassed his wealth from automobile manufacturing, sent 50,000 reichsmarks (about US$12,000 at the then exchange rate of 4.2 reichmarks to US$1) to Adolf Hitler as a birthday gift each year, made at least 78,000 military trucks for Hitler and also published a book The International Jew, which bolstered the impetus of anti-Semitism.
US journalist, war correspondent and historian William Lawrence Shirer has proven that during the French Third Republic, extremist right-wing gangs that took to the streets were backed by large businesses and financial institutions. Major business leaders even tried to persuade the French to drop parliamentary democracy and embrace totalitarian government, like the fascism of Germany and Italy. German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche once said: “Just look at these superfluous people! They acquire wealth and make themselves poorer with it. They desire power and especially the lever of power, plenty of money — these important people.”
This is a very important thing for us to remember because without money, there would be no revolutions nor would there be any dictators.
Whether it be with the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA), the cross-strait service trade agreement or the government’s free economic pilot zones policy, we face the same challenges. Multinational corporations now have the “power of definition” in the modern world, for they not only wish to define the systems of international capital and division of labor, they also want to get involved in the domestic politics of countries and social order to directly manipulate democracy, constitutions, human rights and the law.
The study of political economy holds that economics always involves politics and politics always involves economics.
Democracy and economics need not be viewed as mutually exclusive, but democracy, human rights and constitutions cannot be ignored when we are talking about economic development. This is something we must be very careful about.
Lin Chia-ho is an assistant professor at National Chengchi University’s College of Law.
Translated by Drew Cameron
The EU’s biggest banks have spent years quietly creating a new way to pay that could finally allow customers to ditch their Visa Inc and Mastercard Inc cards — the latest sign that the region is looking to dislodge two of the most valuable financial firms on the planet. Wero, as the project is known, is now rolling out across much of western Europe. Backed by 16 major banks and payment processors including BNP Paribas SA, Deutsche Bank AG and Worldline SA, the platform would eventually allow a German customer to instantly settle up with, say, a hotel in France
On August 6, Ukraine crossed its northeastern border and invaded the Russian region of Kursk. After spending more than two years seeking to oust Russian forces from its own territory, Kiev turned the tables on Moscow. Vladimir Putin seemed thrown off guard. In a televised meeting about the incursion, Putin came across as patently not in control of events. The reasons for the Ukrainian offensive remain unclear. It could be an attempt to wear away at the morale of both Russia’s military and its populace, and to boost morale in Ukraine; to undermine popular and elite confidence in Putin’s rule; to
A traffic accident in Taichung — a city bus on Sept. 22 hit two Tunghai University students on a pedestrian crossing, killing one and injuring the other — has once again brought up the issue of Taiwan being a “living hell for pedestrians” and large vehicle safety to public attention. A deadly traffic accident in Taichung on Dec. 27, 2022, when a city bus hit a foreign national, his Taiwanese wife and their one-year-old son in a stroller on a pedestrian crossing, killing the wife and son, had shocked the public, leading to discussions and traffic law amendments. However, just after the
The international community was shocked when Israel was accused of launching an attack on Lebanon by rigging pagers to explode. Most media reports in Taiwan focused on whether the pagers were produced locally, arousing public concern. However, Taiwanese should also look at the matter from a security and national defense perspective. Lebanon has eschewed technology, partly because of concerns that countries would penetrate its telecommunications networks to steal confidential information or launch cyberattacks. It has largely abandoned smartphones and modern telecommunications systems, replacing them with older and relatively basic communications equipment. However, the incident shows that using older technology alone cannot