US coffee chain operator Starbucks on Monday announced a generous education program by offering tuition-free online college classes at Arizona State University for some of its employees. Amazingly, at least to Taiwanese employers, the workers participating in the “Starbucks College Achievement Plan” are not required to stay with Starbucks after finishing their studies.
This would be unthinkable for Taiwanese firms, which prioritize making profits for shareholders, instead of taking care of employees, or their communities. In Taiwan, most companies offer only job training and some skills-enhancing programs after working hours, and few award scholarships to excellent employees to further their education.
Those that do so attach conditions that employees must stay with their employers for a longer period of time. Only a handful of workers are eligible or willing to enroll in those programs, given the limited help from those classes in terms of skills or payrolls.
Local employers often complain that they are not getting enough talent, whether at entry-level or senior positions. They also complain of a huge and long-running mismatch between supply and demand in the job market. They say a high percentage of college graduates do not fit the positions they offer because they lack skills or sufficient knowledge.
Local enterprises count on the nation’s shabby education system to fix the talent problem, rather than trying to find solutions within the companies.
Local electronics companies suffer the brunt as they have stopped paying employees stock bonuses due to new unfavorable accounting rules.
Lately, industry representatives have called for their resumption and urged the government to make it a rule because paying stock bonuses was a big draw for jobseekers, as it helped workers accumulate wealth fast.
It is also the most economical way for technology firms to reward employees.
Now it seems to be a pipe dream for companies to rely entirely on the education system or the government to broaden the talent pool in light of the bureaucratic inertia of the government and the short-sighted nature of local students and their parents.
Here is an example: The government encouraged vocational schools to expand into colleges, with the aim of cultivating more professionals. However, the results have had the opposite effect, because those colleges produce unqualified college graduates who cannot fit industry needs.
The government budgeted NT$239 million (US$7.97 million) for job training this year, but only for small, local businesses that employ fewer than 50 workers.
Local companies should do more themselves to broaden their talent pool. This is the very least that companies should do to boost equity return for their shareholders.
However, there is something more important for corporate executives than simply gratifying shareholders or investors: It is social responsibility.
Starbucks chief executive Howard Schultz said in a video posted on the company’s Web site about its new education program: “We can’t be a bystander and we can’t wait for Washington” to solve the growing inequality within the US.
“And I strongly believe that businesses and business leaders must do more for their people and for the communities we serve,” Schultz said.
US college students face skyrocketing tuition and towering student debts totaling US$1.2 trillion now.
Starbucks should be an inspiration for local enterprises to think more and to do more for their employees and for society.
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
As the war in Burma stretches into its 76th year, China continues to play both sides. Beijing backs the junta, which seized power in the 2021 coup, while also funding some of the resistance groups fighting the regime. Some suggest that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is hedging his bets, positioning China to side with the victors regardless of the outcome. However, a more accurate explanation is that China is acting pragmatically to safeguard its investments and ensure the steady flow of natural resources and energy for its economy. China’s primary interest is stability and supporting the junta initially seemed like the best
Numerous expert analyses characterize today’s US presidential election as a risk for Taiwan, given that the two major candidates, US Vice President Kamala Harris and former US president Donald Trump, are perceived to possess divergent foreign policy perspectives. If Harris is elected, many presume that the US would maintain its existing relationship with Taiwan, as established through the American Institute in Taiwan, and would continue to sell Taiwan weapons and equipment to help it defend itself against China. Under the administration of US President Joe Biden, whose political views Harris shares, the US on Oct. 25 authorized arms transfers to Taiwan, another