The ghost of the US “green card” is back and again haunting President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九). The controversy began six years ago in the run-up to the 2008 presidential election when then-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma was accused of possessing US permanent residency.
The Chinese-language Next Magazine on Wednesday reported that information provided by the US’ Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS) Beijing office suggested Ma is obligated to pay taxes in the US under the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act because he still holds a green card.
The news sent a shockwave through the nation, with the opposition rushing to issue its sternest condemnations ever against Ma — ranging from branding him “an extraordinary shame and humiliation” and “international joke” to calling for immediate resignation.
Via a Presidential Office spokesperson, Ma has denied the accusation, reiterating that his green card expired long ago. The Presidential Office yesterday produced a letter, dated May 14 and signed by managing director of the Washington office of the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) Joseph Donovan Jr, dismissing allegations that Ma still has permanent US resident status, and adding that Ma will not rule out taking legal action against the magazine.
Taiwanese care whether Ma, the head of state and the elected president of the Republic of China, still possesses permanent US residency and needs to pay taxes to the US government.
The Next Magazine report warrants further verification. That this issue has again risen to the surface is an embarrassment to the country, nevermind Ma, considering that in less than a week he will mark his sixth year as president, a position that epitomizes Taiwanese independence and sovereignty.
Despite the AIT letter that seemed to refute the green card allegations, a number of unanswered questions remain. For instance, did Ma complete Form I-407 (Abandonment of Lawful Permanent Resident Status), which is an obligation for green card holders wishing to relinquish permanent residency? If he did, when did he file it? If Ma did fill out an I-407, does it mean Ma was lying six years ago when he said his green card had been “automatically invalidated” in 1985 when he applied for a non-immigrant visa?
Back in 2008 when Ma was dogged by the green card allegation, he was able to bluster through and won the election due to his high popularity at the time and also comments by former AIT director Douglas Paal, who said a green card becomes invalid when the holder stops using it for more than one year.
That the same allegation has resurfaced six years later suggests that Taiwanese are still confused about where Ma’s allegiance lies.
The US government’s new law to combat offshore tax dodging by US citizens will take effect on July 1. It will require foreign banks, investment funds and insurers to hand over information to the IRS about accounts over US$50,000 held by Americans.
Ma’s status as a permanent resident of the US would be confirmed if he received notification from the IRS to pay taxes. There is one downside — on grounds of personal privacy, the public may never know whether the IRS issued such a notification to Ma.
Another way is for Ma to come forward once and for all and address the public’s concerns on all questions pertaining to his green card.
As the issue exemplifies Ma’s credibility, the legitimacy of his presidency and his allegiance to the country, he should face the public in person rather than continuously hiding behind press releases and conferences convened by Presidential Office spokespeople.
Only then would Taiwanese be able to lay the issue to rest and be confident their president is truly loyal to the country he serves.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Monday announced that she would dissolve parliament on Friday. Although the snap election on Feb. 8 might appear to be a domestic affair, it would have real implications for Taiwan and regional security. Whether the Takaichi-led coalition can advance a stronger security policy lies in not just gaining enough seats in parliament to pass legislation, but also in a public mandate to push forward reforms to upgrade the Japanese military. As one of Taiwan’s closest neighbors, a boost in Japan’s defense capabilities would serve as a strong deterrent to China in acting unilaterally in the