When searching for an adjective to describe our comprehensively surveilled networked world — the one bookmarked by the US National Security Agency (NSA) at one end and by Google, Facebook, Yahoo and co at the other — “Orwellian” is the word that people generally reach for.
However, “Kafkaesque” seems more appropriate. The term is conventionally defined as “having a nightmarishly complex, bizarre or illogical quality,” but Frederick Karl, Franz Kafka’s most assiduous biographer, regarded that as missing the point.
“What’s Kafkaesque,” he told the New York Times, “is when you enter a surreal world in which all your control patterns, all your plans, the whole way in which you have configured your own behavior, begins to fall to pieces, when you find yourself against a force that does not lend itself to the way you perceive the world.”
A vivid description of this was provided recently by Janet Vertesi, a sociologist at Princeton University.
She gave a talk at a conference describing her experience of trying to keep her pregnancy secret from marketers.
Her report is particularly pertinent because pregnant women are regarded by online advertisers as one of the most valuable entities on the net.
You and I are worth, on average, only US$0.10 each. However, a pregnant woman is valued at US$1.50 because she is about to embark on a series of purchasing decisions stretching well into her child’s lifetime.
Professor Vertesi’s story is about big data, but from the bottom up. It is a gripping personal account of what it takes to avoid being collected, tracked and entered into databases.
First — and most obviously — she determined that there would be absolutely no mention of her new state on social media.
She phoned or wrote individually to friends and family members to give them the good news and asked them not to mention it on Facebook.
However, an uncle in Australia sent her a congratulatory message via Facebook.
“I then did what any rational person would do. I deleted the thread of all our conversations and unfriended him,” she said.
He replied plaintively: “But I didn’t put it on your wall,” apparently unaware that chats and other messages are not private in the sense that he assumed.
In preparing for the birth of her child, Vertesi was nothing if not thorough.
Instead of using a Web browser in the normal way — ie, leaving a trail of cookies and other digital tracks, she used the online service Tor to visit babycenter.com anonymously. She shopped offline whenever she could and paid in cash.
On the occasions when she had to use Amazon, she set up a new Amazon account linked to an e-mail address on a personal server, had all packages delivered to a local locker and made sure only to pay with Amazon gift cards that had been purchased with cash.
The really significant moment came when she came to buy a big-ticket item — an expensive stroller that was the urbanite’s equivalent of an SUV.
Her husband tried to buy US$500 of Amazon gift vouchers with cash, only to discover that this triggered a warning: Retailers have to report people buying large numbers of gift vouchers with cash because, well, you know, they are obviously money launderers.
At this point, some sobering thoughts begin to surface.
The first is Melvin Kranzberg’s observation that “technology is neither good nor bad; nor is it neutral.”
Our technologies have values built into them, which is why Vertesi in her talk cites someone’s observation that “the iPod is a tool to make us moral” (because it encourages people to buy music rather than download it illicitly) and philosophers argue about whether surveillance encourages moral — ie, socially approved — behavior (think speed cameras).
Even more sobering, though, are the implications of Vertesi’s decision to use Tor as a way of ensuring the anonymity of her Web-browsing activities.
She had a perfectly reasonable reason for doing this — to ensure that, as a mother-to-be, she was not tracked and targeted by online marketers.
However, we know from the Edward Snowden disclosures and other sources that Tor users are automatically regarded with suspicion by the NSA et al on the grounds that people who do not wish to leave a digital trail are obviously up to no good. The same goes for people who encrypt their e-mails.
This is why the industry response to protests about tracking is so inadequate. The market will fix the problem, the companies say, because if people do not like being tracked then they can opt not to be. However, the Vertesi experiment shows that if you take measures to avoid being tracked, then you increase the probability that you will be. Which is truly Kafkaesque.
In an article published in Newsweek on Monday last week, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged China to retake territories it lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. “If it is really for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t China take back Russia?” Lai asked, referring to territories lost in 1858 and 1860. The territories once made up the two flanks of northern Manchuria. Once ceded to Russia, they became part of the Russian far east. Claims since then have been made that China and Russia settled the disputes in the 1990s through the 2000s and that “China
China has successfully held its Forum on China-Africa Cooperation, with 53 of 55 countries from the African Union (AU) participating. The two countries that did not participate were Eswatini and the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, which have no diplomatic relations with China. Twenty-four leaders were reported to have participated. Despite African countries complaining about summit fatigue, with recent summits held with Russia, Italy, South Korea, the US and Indonesia, as well as Japan next month, they still turned up in large numbers in Beijing. China’s ability to attract most of the African leaders to a summit demonstrates that it is still being
Trips to the Kenting Peninsula in Pingtung County have dredged up a lot of public debate and furor, with many complaints about how expensive and unreasonable lodging is. Some people even call it a tourist “butchering ground.” Many local business owners stake claims to beach areas by setting up parasols and driving away people who do not rent them. The managing authority for the area — Kenting National Park — has long ignored the issue. Ultimately, this has affected the willingness of domestic travelers to go there, causing tourist numbers to plummet. In 2008, Taiwan opened the door to Chinese tourists and in
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) on Thursday was handcuffed and escorted by police to the Taipei Detention Center, after the Taipei District Court ordered that he be detained and held incommunicado for suspected corruption during his tenure as Taipei mayor. The ruling reversed an earlier decision by the same court on Monday last week that ordered Ko’s release without bail. That decision was appealed by prosecutors on Wednesday, leading the High Court to conclude that Ko had been “actively involved” in the alleged corruption and it ordered the district court to hold a second detention hearing. Video clips
RSS