During his visit to Japan, US President Barrack Obama attracted international attention by bringing up the issue of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).
Japan is unwilling to lower import tariffs on five kinds of agricultural products and the two sides are continuing talks.
According to the media in this nation, some experts believe that if Taiwan does not deregulate imports of pork containing ractopamine, Taiwan will have a long way to go before it can join the TPP and it now has to make a choice. Ministry of Economic Affairs officials also said that the agricultural issue was the main obstacle to entry to TPP membership.
Official data shows that TPP membership will cause agricultural losses of NT$59 billion (US$11.94 billion) and put 16,000 farmers out of work, with the hog and chicken industries being the hardest hit.
Since the government feels that this is unavoidable, farmers want to know why the government has not proposed any concrete measures designed to protect the rights and interests of farmers.
Instead it is waiting until the last minute before demanding that farmers acknowledge the bigger picture and make concessions, thus forcing them to take to the streets, causing further upheaval to Taiwanese society.
The number of hog farmers and the number of hogs in the nation have shrunk dramatically in recent years and there have also been changes in farming methods.
Supply is insufficient to meet the domestic demand of 10 million tonnes, but although more than 30,000 tonnes are imported, mainly from the US, Canada and the Netherlands, domestically produced fresh pork remains the preference of consumers.
The competent authorities should first assess the impact of lowering import tariffs and allowing imports of US pork containing ractopamine. They should commission agricultural economists to make estimates based on economic models.
However, since the data provided by the models is restricted and can only be used for reference purposes, the authorities should also ask academics, experts and farmers’ organizations to analyze the data and then engage in two-way discussions with farmers’ representatives. Farmers’ opinions should then be compiled and used as the main foundation for strategic talks in order to minimize harm.
Considering the impact of cuts on import tariffs — tariffs are currently at 12.5 percent and the lower cost of pork production in the US — the production cost in Taiwan is 1.8 times more than in the US — the government should, in addition to asking for an extension of the deadline for cutting tariffs and adopting quota restrictions in order to avoid dumping by the US, draw up plans alleviating the plight of hog farmers suffering from the deteriorating industry environment that has been the result of operative inefficiencies.
For farmers who want to stay in the industry, the government should implement volume controls and provide strong guidance in order to raise operative efficiency by helping them improve breeding, feed recipes, feed and management techniques, disease prevention and the production environment and lower the disease incidence while decreasing the use of drugs and antibiotics.
This would make domestic pork far healthier and safer than imported US pork. It should also implement a domestic certification system so that consumers can differentiate between different kinds of pork and let quality and safety win out.
The untreated waste water, waste products and noxious smells that are released into the air and rivers from hog farms have resulted in severe river pollution and the impact on the environment has been criticized by nearby residents.
The government should learn from the successes in Denmark, Norway, Sweden and Germany and invite experts to help initiate modern biogas power generation in order to increase the quality of hog farming and improve the rural environment and the economic situation.
Taiwan needs to join regional trade blocs in order to develop its foreign trade, but the government cannot only play on economic fears.
The government must take care of the industries that would be hurt rather than just let them perish. The fact that the government has not learned from the service trade agreement debacle and simply continues in its old ways, focusing on propaganda and ignoring communication, is worrying.
Seeing China’s Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait Deputy Chairman Zheng Lizhong (鄭立中) entering Taiwan’s farming villages and earnestly showing his deep understanding should make Taiwan’s agricultural officials feel ashamed of themselves.
Du Yu is chief executive officer of the Chen-Li Task Force for Agricultural Reform.
Translated by Perry Svensson
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has
RSS