When cousins Alexander and Igor Shilov get together each week to drink beer and play Mortal Kombat, they try to avoid discussing politics.
Alexander, 20, has spent almost every day for the past two weeks volunteering at the occupied Donetsk regional administration, where pro-Russia protesters have declared a “Donetsk People’s Republic” and refused to leave the building until a referendum on independence from Kiev is held.
Igor, 28, calls himself a Ukrainian nationalist and supports Svoboda, the parliamentary party that many see as a fascist organization aiming to crack down on Russian speakers in the country’s east.
Illustration: Constance Chou
Over pizza and beer one night recently, the cousins began arguing bitterly as soon as talk turned to politics.
“We can’t deny that the Donetsk People’s Republic is an illegal formation,” Igor said.
“We just want independence,” Alexander said.
“What will independence give us?” Igor asked.
“It’s a good decision for us Donetsk residents, economically and otherwise. The Kiev regime also came to power illegally,” Alexander replied.
In the ensuing hour-long debate, the only kind words the Shilovs shared came when Igor passed Alexander a knife after the younger cousin burned himself on cheese dripping off a pizza slice.
Three-quarters of the inhabitants of Donetsk province, which is part of the Donbass coal-mining region that stretches into Russia, speak Russian as a native language and many have a positive view of their larger neighbor, thanks to longstanding economic and cultural ties.
However, surveys by centers in both Donetsk and Kiev show divided opinions on the region’s future, and rival pro-Russian and pro-Ukrainian rallies last month ended in clashes, killing one.
Political differences have grown sharper in the past two weeks as pro-Russia protesters and militia have taken over government buildings in at least 10 cities in eastern Ukraine, splitting friends and relatives.
A poll by the Kiev International Institute of Sociology found 46 percent of those surveyed in eight southern and eastern provinces thought the protests in Kiev that ousted former Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych were an “armed coup d’etat organized by the opposition with the help of the West,” while 54 percent thought Russia was “illegally interfering in Ukraine’s internal affairs.”
When asked whether they supported the “actions of those who seize administrative buildings in your region with weapons in hand,” 72 percent of Donetsk residents said no.
In another survey, by the Donetsk Institute for Social Research and Political Analysis, 18.6 percent opposed changes to the government structure, 47 percent wanted federalization or at least more economic independence from Kiev, 27 percent wanted to join Russia in some form and 5 percent wanted national independence.
Many of Alexander and Igor’s disagreements echoed the contrasting narratives peddled by Russian and Ukrainian media, a difference so stark that many here describe it as an information war.
“Separatism is treason, especially under the wing of another government,” Igor said.
“I don’t accept methods like seizing a police station, taking weapons and giving them out to everyone,” he added, referring to takeovers of buildings in places such as Slavyansk, where pro-Russia militia have reportedly seized 400 firearms.
He opposes the uprising in the interests of preserving Ukraine’s territorial integrity and he said the crackdown on the Russian language that protesters railed against was “made up.”
Alexander bristled at the “separatist” label, but admitted he hoped for an independent Donetsk and restored trade ties with Russia. He blamed the pro-Russia atmosphere at rallies — which often feature Russian flags, chants and appeals to Russian President Vladimir Putin — on so-called “protest tourists” from across the border.
After Igor called the militia who had seized buildings “terrorists,” Alexander argued that Right Sector, the ultranationalist group that spearheaded violent clashes with police at the Kiev protests in January, was the real terrorist organization. At the protests, he said, “they didn’t ask the people’s opinion. A referendum is the only way to do that.”
Yekaterina Kovalivnich, 24, whose parents do not approve of her support for the new Kiev government, said many Donetsk residents “categorically can’t accept a different opinion, there is no willingness to go to compromise. In my family, people listen entirely to one side, they can’t listen to any others.”
She and her parents often start arguing about politics when watching Russian television, which she says distorts the situation on the ground. Her parents resent rising food and utility costs under the new regime.
Political views do not follow clear generational lines — Kovalivnich’s grandmother is pro-Ukrainian.
At a pro-Ukraine demonstration last week that also drew pro-Russia protesters, old and young people on both sides continued to argue after the rally was over, but the political differences do appear to have some socioeconomic basis — groups of coalminers and other blue-collar workers have come out to support the Donetsk occupation, arguing that the region’s heavy industry is suffering from the recent disruption to trade with Russia.
“There are people who think that the territorial integrity of Ukraine is paramount, but in miner families no one supports that,” said Artyom, a Donetsk republic activist who declined to give his surname.
Igor said he recently deleted his profile on VK, the country’s most popular social network, and started a new one under a pseudonym because about half of his old friends disagreed with his support for the new Ukrainian government.
“I don’t want to fight over this,” he said. “We can keep being friends, but without politics.”
It is the same reason why he and Alexander try to avoid the topic when they get together to play Mortal Kombat, but if Russia absorbs Donetsk like it did Crimea, the cousins may end up in different countries.
“If we are joined to Crimea and Russia, I’ll leave here,” Igor said. “I’ll have to start everything over from scratch, but I don’t want to live in a strange country.”
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Saturday last week urged Taiwanese to exercise caution when traveling overseas, citing an intelligence report saying that China might attempt to arrest Taiwanese abroad. China in June last year issued 22 guidelines that allow its courts to try in absentia and sentence to death so-called “diehard” Taiwanese independence activists, even though Chinese courts have no jurisdiction in Taiwan. A senior Chinese official reportedly gave closed-door instructions to Chinese state security units to implement the guidelines in countries friendly to China, information gathered by Taiwan’s intelligence agencies suggested. The official reportedly said that “overseas police stations” and Chinese
RSS