“Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has,” US cultural anthropologist Margaret Mead once said.
On March 18, students occupied the legislature to protest the government’s handling of the cross-strait service trade agreement.
On March 23, activists broke into the Executive Yuan to protest what they said was the government’s disingenuity in conducting dialogue with the Sunflower movement over the trade pact.
On April 16, scores of protesters staged a sit-in on the Ministry of Economic Affairs’ plaza in protest at the government’s handling of a wind turbine construction project in Miaoli County’s Yuanli Township (苑裡).
And the latest addition to the list of protests took place on Tuesday, when about 200 former freeway toll collectors scuffled with police at the Ministry of Transportation and Communications as they protested against what they called the government’s broken promises to find them jobs and offer compensation comparable with redundancies in state-run corporations.
With some wondering which government building will be the next target of public grievance, it is almost certain that the public now, unlike in the past, are no longer willing to remain mute in the face of what they perceive as the government’s arrogance, its obliviousness to public opinion and unwillingness to communicate.
As we ponder Mead’s words, it has become ever clearer that the student-led Sunflower movement presented not just a demonstration against the government’s “black-box,” or opaque, handling of the controversial service trade pact in a bid to restore basic democratic principles, but it has also awakened Taiwanese awareness of civic engagement and issues of critical importance from the grassroots up.
Through the Sunflower movement, many people who were previously apathetic and avoided sensitive social issues, now realize that politics is not inaccessible and they have been struck by a clear notion that every individual can indeed make a difference; that they can challenge and collectively fight against those in power to propel the country toward a more promising future.
In view of the recent series of cases of demonstrators besieging governmental buildings to protest against the lack of responsiveness — or worse, apathy — on the part of the government toward people’s plights and their concerns about the erosion of democracy, citizens are becoming more aware that by not staying silent, but instead taking action to pressure the government, they can help to keep the government in check and maintain a responsible and responsive democracy.
Continuous pressure is therefore needed to deal with the government’s arrogant display of power. However, some cannot help but wonder whether all these voices are loud enough for the president and senior officials, who continue to believe that “this kind of thing will blow over in a couple of days.”
“Government officials should feel the public’s pain,” President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has often told officials as he lectures on the importance of public opinion, of listening to citizens and reflecting on how the government can improve people’s livelihoods.
Let us hope that Ma and his officials will indeed open their ears to hear what the public has to say, and not keep their minds closed to civic participation.
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
International debate on Taiwan is obsessed with “invasion countdowns,” framing the cross-strait crisis as a matter of military timetables and political opportunity. However, the seismic political tremors surrounding Central Military Commission (CMC) vice chairman Zhang Youxia (張又俠) suggested that Washington and Taipei are watching the wrong clock. Beijing is constrained not by a lack of capability, but by an acute fear of regime-threatening military failure. The reported sidelining of Zhang — a combat veteran in a largely unbloodied force and long-time loyalist of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — followed a year of purges within the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA)
Taiwan needs to step up efforts to protect its access to rare earths amid escalating geopolitical risks and global economic uncertainty, given that its export-oriented economy relies heavily on imports of the elements to produce electronics. Taiwan is not the only country facing pressure to secure stable access to rare earths — metallic elements used in artificial intelligence servers, smartphones, electric vehicles and military applications such as fighter jets — after China imposed an export licensing measure last year that threatened to cut off supplies. China is using its dominance in rare earths as a bargaining chip in its trade negotiatons
RSS