There is resentment among supporters of the pan-green camp with the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for failing to live up to expectations.
Yet while the DPP has not achieved its full potential, it is maturing. This is why, under the influence of the Sunflower movement, DPP Chairman Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) announced that he was withdrawing from the DPP chair elections.
Sometimes, taking a step back makes it easier to resolve problems. This is true not just for Su, but also for the DPP and even for Taiwan as a whole. Of course, this all depends on the party’s future performance.
The DPP has long been afflicted with factional battles and inner-party political calculating, with the result that even when good things are achieved, they are often shrouded in conspiracy theories. The Sunflower movement was also internally divided, and the occupation of the Executive Yuan, withdrawal from the Legislative Yuan and subsequent surrounding of Taipei’s Zhongzheng First Police Precinct station should serve as a good lesson for the DPP, as it showed that the key is to remain humble and disregard personal interest.
Hopefully, the next generation of DPP leaders have been less affected by the party’s factionalism.
As a supporter of the pan-green camp, I do not question Su’s sincerity in dropping out of the DPP chair elections, but I do not belong to any faction within the DPP.
I often share in the enthusiasm of grassroots and overseas supporters and I also have my own ideas as to just how sincere certain senior DPP members are. I always look at the bigger picture and in the past, I openly showed my support for former DPP chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), which may have offended some in the pan-green camp.
Recently, I have had some contact with Su at public events and have sensed his sincerity in addition to paying close attention to his recent statements and actions. I therefore do not think his dropping out of the race was an act of political calculation.
After former premier Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) also announced he would be withdrawing from the race for DPP chair, Tsai said that she was willing to “shoulder responsibility.” Tsai is between the DPP’s big leaders and its coming generation of leaders and enjoys a lot of support. It is good for the DPP to have her run. If this did not happen, the DPP chair elections would be surrounded by a lot of confusion.
However, the most important question is what sort of responsibility she was referring to.
When former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) was in power, he often talked about how he kept the desires of the public close to his heart at all times.
What did people want back then? When 500,000 people took to the streets of Taipei on March 30, they expressed what they wanted, and they have also expressed what they want in opinion polls.
The Sunflower movement began because of resistance to a lack of transparency regarding the cross-strait service trade agreement. The agreement not only pertains to Taiwan’s sovereignty, it will also affect democracy and the prospects of Taiwan’s younger generations.
On April 9, during the last night of the student occupation of the Legislative Yuan, the students gathered around to discuss their worries and express their innermost thoughts.
Given the lively atmosphere, I did not hear what was being said all that clearly. However, I did notice a group of students who came down from the second floor of the legislature and had been working hard during the entire occupation. They were visibly more emotional and radical.
On the second floor of the legislature, they hung horizontal banners that read: “Liberate the enslaved workers!” These banners were later interpreted as an expression of young people seeking liberation from the NT$22,000 starting salaries that are now the norm.
This just shows the great impact these low salaries have had on the younger generation. If the trade pact is rushed through the legislature, this situation will only become worse.
Tsai lost in the last presidential election. In her mild manner, she equated the Republic of China with Taiwan in order to attract more median voters. However, she was not critical enough of how President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has been selling out Taiwan and of China’s meddling in Taiwan’s affairs.
This caused people to lose confidence in Tsai’s ability to assert Taiwan’s sovereignty.
This should not be a matter of always opposing anything related to China, but rather a principle that must be followed in all dealings with China and a central element that separates the DPP from Ma and his “comprador” group.
This principle has to be followed in the future to increase the confidence of the Taiwanese and it is also the only way party politics can be merged with civic movements.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Drew Cameron
In a meeting with Haitian Minister of Foreign Affairs Jean-Victor Harvel Jean-Baptiste on Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) vowed to continue providing aid to Haiti. Taiwan supports Haiti with development in areas such as agriculture, healthcare and education through initiatives run by the Taiwan International Cooperation and Development Fund (ICDF). The nation it has established itself as a responsible, peaceful and innovative actor committed to global cooperation, Jean-Baptiste said. Testimonies such as this give Taiwan a voice in the global community, where it often goes unheard. Taiwan’s reception in Haiti also contrasts with how China has been perceived in countries in the region
On April 13, I stood in Nanan (南安), a Bunun village in southern Hualien County’s Jhuosi Township (卓溪), absorbing lessons from elders who spoke of the forest not as backdrop, but as living presence — relational, sacred and full of spirit. I was there with fellow international students from National Dong Hwa University (NDHU) participating in a field trip that would become one of the most powerful educational experiences of my life. Ten days later, a news report in the Taipei Times shattered the spell: “Formosan black bear shot and euthanized in Hualien” (April 23, page 2). A tagged bear, previously released
The world has become less predictable, less rules-based, and more shaped by the impulses of strongmen and short-term dealmaking. Nowhere is this more consequential than in East Asia, where the fate of democratic Taiwan hinges on how global powers manage — or mismanage — tensions with an increasingly assertive China. The return of Donald Trump to the White House has deepened the global uncertainty, with his erratic, highly personalized foreign-policy approach unsettling allies and adversaries alike. Trump appears to treat foreign policy like a reality show. Yet, paradoxically, the global unpredictability may offer Taiwan unexpected deterrence. For China, the risk of provoking the
Starting this month, young women in Denmark would be subject to conscription on the same terms as men. All Danes, regardless of gender, would be required to register for military assessment, and eligible individuals would be selected through a lottery-based draft. In addition, service time would be increased to 11 months, and conscript numbers would grow to meet national defense targets. Denmark is not alone. In the past few years, several European countries, most notably Sweden and Norway, have adopted gender-neutral conscription systems. Latvia is moving in the same direction. The war in Ukraine has accelerated this trend. Faced with the
RSS