Nation needs innovators
The crushing financial burden that the Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) administration is leaving to young people is the crime of the century.
With the lowest wages for graduates ever, young people are faced with the inevitable consequences of the rapacious greed that has infected every part and party of Taiwan.
It is time for Taiwanese students to demand a better level of education from their teachers.
Physics and chemistry students should be demanding that their teachers explain how the element thorium can be used to build small modular molten-salt reactors that can safely create localized energy while also destroying the appalling mountains of nuclear waste that have been building up over the years.
Taiwan more than anything needs a sensible approach to farming and energy.
It produces only 23 percent of its own food, which is shocking, considering the number of farmers (and rich landowners) who are paid taxpayer money to not grow crops.
Apart from food, nearly all of the nation’s energy sources are imported, like oil and coal.
For fast-track thorium development in universities, an award should be given to the Taiwanese college that produces the best design. Bring back the days when “Made in Taiwan” actually meant something, and leverage the nation’s amazing innovation abilities and value-added knowledge.
It is time to get moving. The global economy is more fragile than ever, and China is clearly an “irresponsible stakeholder.”
If shipping lanes were to be disrupted through financial collapse, natural disaster or war, half of the people in Taiwan would starve within two weeks.
Industrial hemp could be a solution to increase exports and boost employment. It can reduce deforestation by being used to make paper, cloth, biofuel, some medicines and “hempcrete” — an all-green concrete substitute. Hemp grows four times faster than trees do and rejuvenates the soil. Students should look into this and start asking their teachers questions.
Students have opportunities through 3D printing and Taiwan’s amazing pre-fabricated building industry. Vocational-technical students should be finding out more about this, and perhaps why Nikola Tesla’s secrets are still being held by the US.
Paradigm-shifting breakthroughs are needed in Taiwan.
Humankind will, one way or another, learn to adapt to a future where unlimited supplies of fossil fuels will not be taken for granted.
Given all of the above and taking into consideration climate change, the first country that makes a self-sustainable move will be the winner.
If Taiwan can deregulate electricity generation and sell superficies rights to roads, enough bond-buyers near E-Da World theme complex in Kaohsiung could build a sufficiency of solar panels to keep the ice rink frozen in summer, but only if there is a plan for people to invest productively in IT projects.
Students everywhere should read Economics in One Lesson by Henry Hazlitt to learn how the economy works. They would also learn what the lines are between government intervention and a free-market economy based on individual choice.
Torch Pratt
New Taipei City
Damage overvalued
The Executive Yuan plans to seek compensation from the protesters who broke into the Executive Yuan on March 23 (“Student donations illegal: ministry,” April 10, page 1). Outrageously, the allegedly damaged items’ combined worth is NT$3 million (US$100,000). Anyone perusing the brief list will note that it basically consists of office furniture: “four timber doors, 13 windows, a refrigerator, a photocopy machine, a fax machine, a cabinet and some tables and chairs.”
Where did the Executive Yuan procure these items? Sotheby’s? They are obviously not from IKEA. It is surprising that no one is complaining that this is how taxes have been spent. Doesn’t the current administration want to minimize waste? Aren’t the contents of the building insured?
This minor issue needs to be addressed, because as it stands, it smacks of economic terrorism designed to discourage protest. What next? Presenting protesters with bills covering the costs of policing the protest? Invoicing students for their own evictions? Where will it end?
Ainesley Crabbe
Yunlin County
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at