Foxconn’s bridge
Foxconn (富士康) reportedly offered an “off-ramp” bridge to the Sunflower movement and was gently rejected.
As has been well documented in numerous sociological studies, good intentions alone do not guarantee the expected outcome. Often, the disappointment may be traced back to misconceptions emanating from the goodwill itself.
Therefore, where is the rub?
Foxconn was offering job opportunities and telling protesters that Taiwan will have a bright future if integrated with China.
Alas, Foxconn is riding on an economic monorail while the protesters are on a political double-track. They do not see eye-to-eye at all.
Does Foxconn realize its offers are not “the good intention rejected,” not even the pay scale — reportedly less than NT$30,000 per month for an engineer? It is the underlying message that is irking the protesters. Foxconn is saying: “Children, submit yourself, be happy sheep, and I shall feed your belly and be your shepherd.”
Through Foxconn’s binoculars — with its investment locked up in China, a Taiwan shackled by Beijing definitely displays a bright dollar sign.
By offering an off-ramp disguised as an olive branch — hoping to cow the protesters into retreat, Foxconn is also attempting to build a bridge across the Taiwan Strait solely for its own economic benefit.
However, what Foxconn fails to include, or perhaps intentionally ignores in the calculation, is that a bridge always serves two directions and allows both commercial and military vehicles.
A dinosaur can easily quash a pigeon. A two-way bridge just makes it easier.
If that ever happens, Foxconn will face a choice of no choice. It will either not have a chance to offer goodwill anymore or be told to offer one any time at a master’s whim.
Foxconn: Thanks, but no thanks.
Kengchi Goah
US
As it has striven toward superiority in most measures of the Asian military balance, China is now ready to challenge the undersea balance of power, long dominated by the United States, a decisive advantage crucial to its ability to deter blockade and invasion of Taiwan by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). America expended enormous treasure to develop the technology, logistics, training, and personnel to emerge victorious in the Cold War undersea struggle against the former Soviet Union, and to remain superior today; the US is not used to considering the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN)
Since the end of the Cold War, the US-China espionage battle has arguably become the largest on Earth. Spying on China is vital for the US, as China’s growing military and technological capabilities pose direct challenges to its interests, especially in defending Taiwan and maintaining security in the Indo-Pacific. Intelligence gathering helps the US counter Chinese aggression, stay ahead of threats and safeguard not only its own security, but also the stability of global trade routes. Unchecked Chinese expansion could destabilize the region and have far-reaching global consequences. In recent years, spying on China has become increasingly difficult for the US
The annual summit of East Asia and other events around the ASEAN summit in October and November every year have become the most important gathering of leaders in the Indo-Pacific region. This year, as Laos is the chair of ASEAN, it was privileged to host all of the ministerial and summit meetings associated with ASEAN. Besides the main summit, this included the high-profile East Asia Summit, ASEAN summits with its dialogue partners and the ASEAN Plus Three Summit with China, Japan and South Korea. The events and what happens around them have changed over the past 15 years from a US-supported, ASEAN-led
Lately, China has been inviting Taiwanese influencers to travel to China’s Xinjiang region to make films, weaving a “beautiful Xinjiang” narrative as an antidote to the international community’s criticisms by creating a Potemkin village where nothing is awry. Such manipulations appear harmless — even compelling enough for people to go there — but peeling back the shiny veneer reveals something more insidious, something that is hard to ignore. These films are not only meant to promote tourism, but also harbor a deeper level of political intentions. Xinjiang — a region of China continuously listed in global human rights reports —