The people who made a hippie dream come true do not look the part. Instead of tie-dyed T-shirts, the campaigners who masterminded the legalization of recreational marijuana use in Colorado wore dark suits and ties to celebrate the world’s first legal retail pot sales. Instead of talking about the counter-culture, they spoke of regulations, taxes and corporate responsibility. They looked sober, successful and mainstream.
With Washington State poised to follow Colorado later this year and activists in a dozen other states preparing to fight for legalization, the once-illicit cannabis plant is now a legitimate industry, with advocates, interest groups and lobbyists.
The Marijuana Policy Project, the Drug Policy Alliance, the Medical Marijuana Industry Group and the National Cannabis Industry Association are just some of the groups now vying to shape public opinion and government policy in the US.
SOCIETAL VIEWS
For the likes of Diane Goldstein, a former lieutenant commander with the Los Angeles Police Department who became an activist for the group Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP), the groundswell of support for legalization is welcome evidence that society has turned against the drug war.
“It’s no longer dangerous for people to have a rational view about a failed policy,” she said.
Yet for Kevin Sabet of the group Smart Approaches to Marijuana, which opposes legalization, the celebratory scenes in Denver pot shops last week is proof that a Big Tobacco-style campaign of manipulation has prevailed.
He said that many Americans are unaware that cannabis can cause long-term damage to people’s health, especially among young people, and that the American Medical Association opposes legalization.
“It’s Big Tobacco redux,” said Sabet, who also directs the Drug Policy Institute at the University of Florida’s Department of Psychiatry.
What was a fringe movement four decades ago has evolved into a slick, well-funded network based in Washington, he added.
“It was: ‘We need to cut our ponytails, take off our tie-dye shirts, put on our Macy’s suits, go to [the US] Congress and start lobbying state legislators,’” Sabet said.
In addition, Sabet said that the industry has been mimicking the tobacco playbook in portraying its product as virtually harmless, while using chemistry and marketing to turn consumers into addicts.
According to Sabet, the cannabis industry comprises a vast coalition of lobbyists; billionaire sponsors like George Soros and the late Peter Lewis; and profit-seeking investors like Privateer Holdings and the ArcView Group.
SMARTENING UP
An estimated US$1.43 billion worth of legal marijuana was sold for medicinal purposes last year and that figure is likely to increase exponentially with the advent of legal recreational cannabis.
There is no doubt that the legalization industry has come a long way since Keith Stroup founded the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws in 1970 with US$5,000 from the Playboy Foundation.
Activists say that smartening up their act was a natural step.
A few years ago, Mason Tvert wore scruffy T-shirts while urging Colorado college students to back legalization. After winning that fight with a ballot initiative in the November 2012, he became the Marijuana Policy Project’s communications director and moved to a smart, well-staffed office near the domed State Capitol in Denver.
“Yeah, I wear a suit these days,” he said with a smile.
Yet what is more important is the campaign’s focus on a core message: Cannabis is safer than alcohol, Tvert said.
Buttonholing legislators and policymakers was crucial, said Michael Elliott, executive director of the Denver-based Medical Marijuana Industry Group.
“We’re lobbying for regulation and taxation. That’s why we’re beside the State Capitol. We’re down there every week,” he said.
Tvert and Elliott attribute the momentum behind legalization to public recognition that prohibition has been a fiasco that has led to needless imprisonments and fiscal waste.
Pro-legalization forces still have meager resources and can barely be said to have lobbyists, Goldstein said, adding that LEAP’s speakers are unpaid.
LOBBYING FORCE
Mark Kleiman, a drug legalization expert at the University of California, Los Angeles, said that the marijuana industry is not a united one with shared interests and should not be viewed as a single lobbying force.
For instance, many of those who have licenses to grow and sell medicinal marijuana stand to lose heavily from legalizing recreational use because it would expand competition and depress prices, he said.
Colorado’s medicinal sector obtained the exclusive rights to sell recreational cannabis for nine months and although it is a temporary shield, medicinal growers in Washington fear an impending disaster.
In contrast to profit-driven industry lobby groups, Kleiman said that marijuana’s legalization efforts so far have been led by advocacy groups and funders like Soros, who have stood to make little or no financial gain from the movement.
“These are not mostly people who are making a living from cannabis and are, therefore, lobbying for laws in their industrial interests,” he said, but added that that would likely change with more legalization and money.
“The marijuana lobby is going from being purely ideological to being industrial,” Kleiman said.
Could some of today’s tokers become tomorrow’s industry spin doctors?
“Ten years from now, will there be an evil marijuana lobby devoted entirely to preventing any effective regulation or taxation? Absolutely, but that’s not the reality at the moment,” he said.
Weeks into the craze, nobody quite knows what to make of the OpenClaw mania sweeping China, marked by viral photos of retirees lining up for installation events and users gathering in red claw hats. The queues and cosplay inspired by the “raising a lobster” trend make for irresistible China clickbait. However, the West is fixating on the least important part of the story. As a consumer craze, OpenClaw — the AI agent designed to do tasks on a user’s behalf — would likely burn out. Without some developer background, it is too glitchy and technically awkward for true mainstream adoption,
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
A delegation of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) officials led by Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is to travel to China tomorrow for a six-day visit to Jiangsu, Shanghai and Beijing, which might end with a meeting between Cheng and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). The trip was announced by Xinhua news agency on Monday last week, which cited China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) Director Song Tao (宋濤) as saying that Cheng has repeatedly expressed willingness to visit China, and that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee and Xi have extended an invitation. Although some people have been speculating about a potential Xi-Cheng