US Vice President Joe Biden’s trip to Japan, China and North Korea this week comes at a moment of major diplomatic tension in the region. Last week, Beijing unilaterally declared a new air defense identification zone to much international concern.
The zone covers an area that encompasses the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台), known as the Senkakus in Japan, which are claimed by Taiwan, China and Japan. The dispute over the islands dates back at least three decades, but became much more heated last year when the Japanese government decided to nationalize three islets in the area.
Since the declaration of the air defense zone last week, Beijing has insisted that all flights, civilian and military, must submit flight plans before entering it.
The US and the EU have urged caution to calm regional tensions, and this is likely to be a theme Biden will emphasize in Tokyo, Beijing and Seoul.
In response to China’s declaration, US President Barack Obama’s administration has recommended that US commercial aircraft report their flight plans to Beijing, although US military aircraft continue to operate without notification.
Meanwhile, Japan, which also continues to operate flights in the zone, announced on Saturday that it has asked the UN organization that oversees civil aviation to examine whether the zone could undermine aviation safety.
Tokyo’s goal is to enhance international scrutiny of the issue in a bid to undercut Beijing.
While air zones are commonplace across the world, there is concern that China has both imposed this measure unilaterally and warned that it will take unspecified “emergency defensive measures” if aircraft do not submit flight plans. China has already frayed nerves by sending fighter jets to investigate US and Japanese aircraft in the zone.
Whatever Beijing’s motives in declaring the zone, it will add to the growing international tide of suspicion and sometimes even outright hostility as China increasingly asserts its growing power.
The central challenge that China faces is that its soft power — its ability to win the hearts and minds of other nations and influence their governments through attraction rather than coercion or payment — has lagged far behind its hard power built on its growing economic and military might.
In Japan, for instance, public favor toward China fell from 34 percent in 2011 to 15 percent last year largely in response to China’s new international assertiveness, according to Pew Global.
In the US, public favor toward China fell to 40 percent last year from 51 percent in 2011. Issues such as Beijing’s alleged currency manipulation, the large size of the US trade deficit with China and the large financial debt the US owes Beijing and alleged Chinese cybersecurity attacks on US interests have affected US public opinion.
With distrust of China growing, many countries in the Asia-Pacific region are actively strengthening their diplomatic alliances, particularly with Washington, in a bid to balance Beijing’s growing economic and military strength.
This is a political headache leaders in China could do without and it must now think carefully about how to enhance the nation’s image.
Beijing’s most pressing concern should be to restart a process of addressing the concerns about its intentions foreign governments have.
It needs to intensify efforts to be seen as a responsible, peaceful power and match its rhetoric with action.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) made a good start toward this goal in his landmark summit with Obama last summer.
He pledged to form a “new model of cooperation” and that “China and the United States must find a new path ... one that is different from the inevitable confrontation and conflict between the major countries of the past.”
As the Pew Global data indicated, China’s international image would also benefit from enhanced public diplomacy to win more foreign “hearts and minds.”
On a symbolic level, example measures might include using the nation’s growing capabilities in space travel for high-profile international cooperation projects. Surveys underline that China’s strength in science and technology is admired around the world.
A related problem to be tackled is that Chinese state institutions often lack legitimacy and credibility when it comes to international communications.
One solution might be expanding the number of non-state groups — including from civil society networks, diaspora communities, student and academic groups, and business networks — involved in diplomatic outreach.
There also needs to be stronger Chinese commitment to domestic political change, transparency and concrete steps toward democratization.
Many in the international community are likely to remain wary of China while it clamps down on citizens who seek domestic reform, including human rights activists.
The challenges ahead for China are deep-seated and will require sustained investment and significant reform.
However, unless they are tackled, the country’s reputation will slide, which will stymie its ambitions as a superpower.
Andrew Hammond was formerly a geopolitical analyst at Oxford Analytica and a special adviser in former British prime minister Tony Blair’s government.
In a meeting with Haitian Minister of Foreign Affairs Jean-Victor Harvel Jean-Baptiste on Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) vowed to continue providing aid to Haiti. Taiwan supports Haiti with development in areas such as agriculture, healthcare and education through initiatives run by the Taiwan International Cooperation and Development Fund (ICDF). The nation it has established itself as a responsible, peaceful and innovative actor committed to global cooperation, Jean-Baptiste said. Testimonies such as this give Taiwan a voice in the global community, where it often goes unheard. Taiwan’s reception in Haiti also contrasts with how China has been perceived in countries in the region
On Monday, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) delivered a welcome speech at the ILA-ASIL Asia-Pacific Research Forum, addressing more than 50 international law experts from more than 20 countries. With an aim to refute the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) claim to be the successor to the 1945 Chinese government and its assertion that China acquired sovereignty over Taiwan, Lin articulated three key legal positions in his speech: First, the Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Declaration were not legally binding instruments and thus had no legal effect for territorial disposition. All determinations must be based on the San Francisco Peace
On April 13, I stood in Nanan (南安), a Bunun village in southern Hualien County’s Jhuosi Township (卓溪), absorbing lessons from elders who spoke of the forest not as backdrop, but as living presence — relational, sacred and full of spirit. I was there with fellow international students from National Dong Hwa University (NDHU) participating in a field trip that would become one of the most powerful educational experiences of my life. Ten days later, a news report in the Taipei Times shattered the spell: “Formosan black bear shot and euthanized in Hualien” (April 23, page 2). A tagged bear, previously released
The world has become less predictable, less rules-based, and more shaped by the impulses of strongmen and short-term dealmaking. Nowhere is this more consequential than in East Asia, where the fate of democratic Taiwan hinges on how global powers manage — or mismanage — tensions with an increasingly assertive China. The return of Donald Trump to the White House has deepened the global uncertainty, with his erratic, highly personalized foreign-policy approach unsettling allies and adversaries alike. Trump appears to treat foreign policy like a reality show. Yet, paradoxically, the global unpredictability may offer Taiwan unexpected deterrence. For China, the risk of provoking the