Recently, “Taiwan” has become something of a catchphrase. Just when we thought all that talk about “loving Taiwan” that was popular during the terms of former presidents Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) had disappeared, it has become a new way of seeking redemption for one’s political sins.
Pan-blue parties, and even the Chinese Communist Party, are resorting to using it as a catchphrase more than the pan-green camp.
First, senior officials from President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) government, who have been failing terribly at everything lately, led by Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺), have been falling over themselves to view Taiwanese director Chi Po-lin’s (齊柏林) documentary Beyond Beauty: Taiwan From Above (看見台灣).
After seeing the documentary, they reportedly walked out of the cinema with tears in their eyes and it was even rumored that a special Cabinet meeting would be held in which the film would be the main discussion point.
Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) Minister Stephen Shen (沈世宏), who recently accused environmental groups and celebrity activists of being politically motivated, made a surprising move by saying that the agency is doing everything it can to save the environment.
One cannot help but wonder whether he has seen the destruction done to the beauty of nation’s east coast.
Of course, first lady Chow Mei-ching (周美青) and Minister of the Interior Lee Hong-yuan (李鴻源) were quick to join in and become promoters of environmental protection, boosting their political images in the process.
It is not only senior officials of local governments who are fond of watching the film. Senior Chinese officials have also said they want to listen to the different voices of Taiwan.
Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits (ARATS) Chairman Chen Deming (陳德銘) said that he has come to Taiwan to gain an understanding of what Taiwanese think.
Maybe there was something in the nation’s air that did not agree with him, because during his visit he yelled at a group of protesting students and asked them how many people they were actually capable of representing.
Of course, protesting students cannot represent the opinions of those who are treating people like Chen to dinner every night, including pan-blue politicians such as New Taipei City (新北市) Mayor Eric Chu (朱立倫), Taichung Mayor Jason Hu (胡志強) and Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌).
It is remarkable that while Chen knows full well that he is wining and dining with legislators and others who wield executive power, he chooses to blame the failure of the cross-strait service trade agreement to pass in the legislature on protesting students.
I really do not see why Chen does not simply get his powerful friends to kick those who are against the agreement out of the legislature and then force a vote on the issue.
Do the government officials who have been in power for so long or those officials who view Taiwan as their “home away from home” really want to see the nation and hear what the Taiwanese have to say?
Is it really that difficult? Do they really have to see Taiwan from the skies above to see it clearly and be moved by it?
Surely, if these officials want to see the nation’s true life-force, all they have to do is turn on the television, flick through the papers, walk among the public and listen to what people are saying at protests.
Perhaps the hardest thing for politicians is to hear different voices and see different things.
However, apart from only agreeing with those who share their own viewpoints while ignoring those with diverging ideas, the current electoral system has also strengthened the warped view that the winner takes all. This has created a situation in which only winners have a voice.
However, a democracy monopolized by winners is not a true democracy and a Taiwan only made up of winners is not the whole Taiwan.
This is why civic movements develop rapidly once elections and democracy become more stable.
It is no longer enough to have the right to vote, and a counter reaction to the oppressive public opinion created by the electoral systems is now forming.
Just like Japanese, who have discovered that not all votes are created equal and are debating what to do about the fact that this has hurt the nation’s democracy and human rights, Taiwanese must realize that the only way to be seen and heard is by replacing “voters” with “citizens” and “civil society.”Hsu Yung-ming is an assistant professor of political science at Soochow University.
Translated by Drew Cameron
In a meeting with Haitian Minister of Foreign Affairs Jean-Victor Harvel Jean-Baptiste on Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) vowed to continue providing aid to Haiti. Taiwan supports Haiti with development in areas such as agriculture, healthcare and education through initiatives run by the Taiwan International Cooperation and Development Fund (ICDF). The nation it has established itself as a responsible, peaceful and innovative actor committed to global cooperation, Jean-Baptiste said. Testimonies such as this give Taiwan a voice in the global community, where it often goes unheard. Taiwan’s reception in Haiti also contrasts with how China has been perceived in countries in the region
The world has become less predictable, less rules-based, and more shaped by the impulses of strongmen and short-term dealmaking. Nowhere is this more consequential than in East Asia, where the fate of democratic Taiwan hinges on how global powers manage — or mismanage — tensions with an increasingly assertive China. The return of Donald Trump to the White House has deepened the global uncertainty, with his erratic, highly personalized foreign-policy approach unsettling allies and adversaries alike. Trump appears to treat foreign policy like a reality show. Yet, paradoxically, the global unpredictability may offer Taiwan unexpected deterrence. For China, the risk of provoking the
On April 13, I stood in Nanan (南安), a Bunun village in southern Hualien County’s Jhuosi Township (卓溪), absorbing lessons from elders who spoke of the forest not as backdrop, but as living presence — relational, sacred and full of spirit. I was there with fellow international students from National Dong Hwa University (NDHU) participating in a field trip that would become one of the most powerful educational experiences of my life. Ten days later, a news report in the Taipei Times shattered the spell: “Formosan black bear shot and euthanized in Hualien” (April 23, page 2). A tagged bear, previously released
Young supporters of former Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) were detained for posting the names and photographs of judges and prosecutors believed to be overseeing the Core Pacific City redevelopment corruption case. The supporters should be held responsible for their actions. As for Ko’s successor, TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), he should reflect on whether his own comments are provocative and whether his statements might be misunderstood. Huang needs to apologize to the public and the judiciary. In the article, “Why does sorry seem to be the hardest word?” the late political commentator Nan Fang Shuo (南方朔) wrote