Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) Minister Stephen Sheng’s (沈世宏) criticism of environmental activists and civic groups who oppose the Miramar Resort Hotel construction project in Taitung County as “peripheral organizations” of the opposition camp has compromised grassroots efforts to protect the environment and highlighted the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) administration’s passiveness in handling environmental issues.
Sheng presented a report on EPA policies to the KMT Central Standing Committee on Wednesday, in which he defended the legality of the project in Taitung’s Shanyuan Bay (杉原灣) despite a Supreme Administrative Court order last month for the resort to cease operation. He accused the environmental activists of holding contradictory stances on such projects, as they called for the demolition of the Miramar Resort, but opposed tearing down the Yoho Beach Resort in Pingtung County’s Kenting National Park, even though both hotels were found to have been built illegally.
“Those so-called human rights activists, artists and environmental activists are actually peripheral organizations in politics,” he said.
The accusations are deeply troubling on many levels. Sheng blamed the controversies on the environmental groups and treated them as the enemy when, as the nation’s top environmental officer, he should be working with them to defend the land.
His comments further revealed the arrogance of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, which dismissed environmental activists’ long-term efforts and their knowledge of the projects.
The Miramar Resort in Taitung County, a project that began construction in 2005, has faced continuous opposition from environmental groups and local residents over its impact on the beach and local environment. While the Taitung County Government pushed through an environmental impact assessment approval to defend the legitimacy of the project, civil groups won a lawsuit against the assessment process and the Supreme Administrative Court last month issued a final ruling that the project must be halted.
The Yoho Beach Resort was found to have been operating for 14 years without approval by an impact assessment after a news outlet ran a story on the issue in May. That prompted Sheng to order the resort to suspend operations and ask the Pingtung County Government to conduct an assessment on the resort.
The two projects have violated environmental regulations and avoided impact assessment reviews. Sheng’s defense of the Miramar Resort is what is contradictory.
Several environmental groups have dismissed Sheng’s accusations as groundless and said environmentalists questioned the legitimacy of the two projects without backing either one. They urged the authorities to deal with the issues to protect the environment.
Whatever stances civil groups have on the projects, Sheng and the EPA should take a proactive approach in working with local authorities to demand that the resorts comply with the assessment process. If any circumvention of the law is found, the EPA must suspend the project and demolish the buildings.
The environmental activists and civil groups have no authority to take action against illegal operations. Their job is to raise public awareness on environmental protection, to protest against illegal construction projects and to demand action from the government.
Environmental protection is a crucial public issue that affects everyone’s lives. Nobody who expresses concern about our environment is part of “peripheral organizations.”
Sheng needs to stop shifting the blame for the EPA’s inaction, uphold efforts aimed at protecting the land from being exploited by those who seek political or financial gain, and stop obstructing grassroots efforts to protect the environment.
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
In a Taipei Times editorial published almost three years ago (“Macron goes off-piste,” April 13, 2023, page 8), French President Emmanuel Macron was criticized for comments he made immediately after meeting Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing. Macron had spoken of the need for his country to find a path on Chinese foreign policy no longer aligned with that of the US, saying that continuing to follow the US agenda would sacrifice the EU’s strategic autonomy. At the time, Macron was criticized for gifting Xi a PR coup, and the editorial said that he had been “persuaded to run
RSS