A ruckus has ensued following a minor incident during singer Deserts Chang’s (張懸) concert at the University of Manchester, England, on Nov. 2, when Chang displayed a Republic of China flag on stage and was shouted at by a student from China.
The incident has kindled a blaze of indignant reactions from Internet users in Hong Kong and Taiwan, with many accusing young people in China of being brainwashed and fanatically nationalist among other things.
However, a comment about the incident from a student in China tells a different story. Those who think that young people in China are one big crowd of brainwashed, angry youth might like to read the message. They might discover that they have got the wrong idea.
The student’s message reads as follows: “Freedom is precious and very fragile. I don’t think the quest for freedom will ever end. If you agree with me and what I just said, please click on ‘like’ and share it to let the whole world know that young people in China are definitely not all the kind who would yell ‘No politics today!’ at Chang. They are not all the kind of people who have been made into mental slaves by political oppression and who do not care about politics or dare to talk about it, even when they are abroad.”
“There are other people in this country who want to stand up and do something, even if they know it is futile, and who keep up their moral and even physical courage and set out to achieve their ideals,” the message said.
In China’s online world, political control creates an environment in which it is hard for the voices of people who do not trust the government to get much attention. However, those who are familiar with the way the Internet works in China would say that if the Internet were not so tightly monitored and controlled, and if people were not so worried about speaking their mind, it is hard to say which side would have the loudest voice — the fervent nationalists or the likes of the student who wrote the message.
While some people get carried away with nationalistic fervor, most members of Chinese society say nothing, but their silence does not mean that they have no opinions. These days it is clear that some people in the government and society at large have realized that overheated nationalistic sentiments might turn into their opposite and could even cause trouble for the authorities.
As a result, two contradictory trends can be seen in what the Chinese government says and does. On one hand, Chinese media keep using the same old methods to whip up nationalistic feelings, but on the other hand the authorities can be seen doing everything they can to cool down popular nationalism when it looks as though it might get out of control.
This contradiction shows the predicament in which the Chinese government often finds itself. It comes under pressure from its supporters as well as those who have less faith in it, and a regime that exists without an electoral basis will eventually find that even its supporters cannot necessarily be relied on.
In an ever more diverse society, a government that thinks it can establish and consolidate its legitimacy by manipulating nationalism is only making trouble for itself.
This needs to be carefully considered when reading what Internet users have to say about Xinjiang, Tibet and other such issues.
Wang Dan is a visiting associate professor at National Tsing Hua University’s College of Humanities and Social Sciences.
Translated by Julian Clegg
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength
RSS