When the Minister of finance reported on the state of government debt a few days ago, saying that it was going off the scale, President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) reaction was: “Government debt in some countries stands at 200 percent of GDP, but they are doing just fine. That is why a lot of people wonder what we are afraid of, saying ‘Go on, borrow some more.’ Why can’t we issue more debt?”
This response is deeply regrettable and a cause for great concern given the uncertain future of today’s young and future generations.
On the face of it, Taiwan’s national debt stands at 38.6 percent, a lot less than in other high-debt countries. This seems to imply that Taiwan’s debt situation is both sound and safe. However, in reality this hides a risk for potential national bankruptcy, because the government’s definition of national debt differs from the international standard.
This also means that when the government makes debt comparisons with other countries, the results are often ridiculous because of the different calculation standards.
According to articles 4 and 5 of the Public Debt Act (公共債務法), the government issues non-self-liquidating debt with a maturity of one year or more, excluding short-term debt with a maturity of less than one year.
Furthermore, in 2010, the Control Yuan issued a correction to the Cabinet because it thinks that although the formula for calculating national debt meets the legal requirements, it does not comply with the international definition and therefore it is not suitable for making comparisons with other countries.
In June, the legislature passed an amendment to the Public Debt Act that replaces GNP with GDP as the basis for debt calculation and amends the debt ceiling for the national and local governments so that debt may not exceed 40.6 percent and 9.4 percent respectively, of the average nominal GDP for the previous three fiscal years.
These changes are the main ways in which the government wants to restructure local governments, amend the debt restriction structure for the different government levels and meet international standards.
However, this is nothing but a flawed recipe for issuing more debt.
This flawed amendment, together with the repeatedly raised debt ceiling, will not be a positive recipe for handling the deteriorating debt situation. It is more like a sugar-coated poison pill that will do nothing to control the situation, but instead will increase debt by NT$72 billion (US$2.43 billion).
It has been 20 years since the government was told that it must understand the taxes paid by the public are the precondition for the government services that they need and enjoy, and that continuously borrowing money will not promote public happiness and satisfy more needs.
The transformation and upgrading of the country’s industrial structure is not going very well, unscrupulous businesses create scandal after scandal, overall economic performance over the past few years has started out promising much and ended in desperation, and the government is only capable of promoting tax incentives, as if tax cuts were a cure-all.
The result has been that Taiwan’s tax burden is among the world’s lowest.
This in turn has affected the constantly deteriorating fiscal situation, which in future will force the government to issue debt simply to be able to finance its policies and budgets. This has led to a situation in which the government needs to raise debt to service debt, just as so-called “credit card slaves” must rely on their cards to make ends meet, placing the government in a vicious circle that it is unable extract itself from.
This is why, as Taiwan is facing its current fiscal difficulties and national debt is bringing the nation to the edge of the cliff, we again call on the president to rein in his horses and stop raising the debt so that long-term sustainable development for coming generations can be promoted.
This is a situation that cannot be faced with the mindset that it is okay to borrow more money.
Wu Hui-lin is a researcher at the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research. Huang Shih-chang is an assistant researcher at the institution.
Translated by Perry Svensson
For the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), China’s “century of humiliation” is the gift that keeps on giving. Beijing returns again and again to the theme of Western imperialism, oppression and exploitation to keep stoking the embers of grievance and resentment against the West, and especially the US. However, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that in 1949 announced it had “stood up” soon made clear what that would mean for Chinese and the world — and it was not an agenda that would engender pride among ordinary Chinese, or peace of mind in the international community. At home, Mao Zedong (毛澤東) launched
The restructuring of supply chains, particularly in the semiconductor industry, was an essential part of discussions last week between Taiwan and a US delegation led by US Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment Keith Krach. It took precedent over the highly anticipated subject of bilateral trade partnerships, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) founder Morris Chang’s (張忠謀) appearance on Friday at a dinner hosted by President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for Krach was a subtle indicator of this. Chang was in photographs posted by Tsai on Facebook after the dinner, but no details about their discussions were disclosed. With
To say that this year has been eventful for China and the rest of the world would be something of an understatement. First, the US-China trade dispute, already simmering for two years, reached a boiling point as Washington tightened the noose around China’s economy. Second, China unleashed the COVID-19 pandemic on the world, wreaking havoc on an unimaginable scale and turning the People’s Republic of China into a common target of international scorn. Faced with a mounting crisis at home, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) rashly decided to ratchet up military tensions with neighboring countries in a misguided attempt to divert the
Toward the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) final term in office, there was much talk about his legacy. Ma himself would likely prefer history books to enshrine his achievements in reducing cross-strait tensions. He might see his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Singapore in 2015 as the high point. However, given his statements in the past few months, he might be remembered more for contributing to the breakup of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). We are still talking about Ma and his legacy because it is inextricably tied to the so-called “1992 consensus” as the bedrock of his