A good national leader should have the best interests of the public at heart, heed citizens’ grievances, aim to alleviate their hardships and be responsive to their needs and expectations.
“Government officials should feel the public’s pain,” President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has often said as he lectures officials on the importance of minding citizens’ opinions, listening to them and reflecting on how the government can improve people’s livelihoods.
Regrettably, it appears that Ma’s actions do not match his words and that his policy agenda seems to prioritize something other than Taiwanese’s welfare.
If the president attaches as much importance to public perception as he claims to, he would take note of the latest survey released by Taiwan Indicators Survey Research and offer a public apology for failing so miserably to live up to the public’s expectations.
According to the survey, 75.2 percent of respondents are dissatisfied with Ma’s performance, putting the president’s approval rating at just 12.8 percent, with Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) faring only marginally better at 17.8 percent. The poll also found that nine of the 15 ministers in Jiang’s Cabinet have approval ratings of no more than 10 percent.
In light of the ongoing tainted oil scandal — the result of excessively profit-driven food manufacturers and inadequate government oversight — if Ma genuinely empathizes with the nation’s citizens, he should offer a second public apology for the series of food scares that have occurred under his mandate and damaged not only consumer confidence in state inspection mechanisms, but also Taiwan’s international reputation.
If Ma really wanted to “feel the public’s pain,” he would have taken the many opportunities he has been given to hear what anti-government protesters have to say, instead of shutting them out by deploying police and using dove-catching nets to block the shoes they throw at him. It appears that none of these issues warrant the president’s concern, since he has so far either kept quiet about them or shunned demonstrators.
Ma’s silence and lack of action indicate an incapability to solve problems, or worse, apathy. By contrast, the repeated calls he has made — first in his capacity as president and again on Wednesday in his capacity as KMT chairman at the weekly meeting of the party’s Central Standing Committee — for the legislature to ratify the cross-strait service trade pact lead to the disturbing implication that Ma only cares about matters that are related to China.
Ma was quoted as saying during the meeting that the legislature’s Internal Administration Committee would finish holding the remaining six pubic hearings on the trade pact in three weeks, as opposed to the original plan to hold one session every two weeks, which was the consensus reached during inter-party caucus negotiations.
“What’s the rush?” many people are asking.
The president’s remarks indicate not only an infringement of the legislature’s authority, but also led many to wonder whether he is toeing China’s line by trying to expedite the pact’s ratification, despite the lack of transparency that marred its signing earlier this year.
Ma’s haste to push the trade deal through also disregards that the majority of the public remain ill-informed about its contents, let alone its potential impact and the extent to which the nation and people’s livelihoods will be affected by its implementation.
In striking contrast with his silence in addressing the public’s dissatisfaction with his performance and the food scandal, Ma’s loud, repeated calls for the legislature to clear the cross-strait deal come across to many as him caring only about what he perceives as scoring points on the cross-strait front, while disregarding the needs of Taiwanese.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has a good reason to avoid a split vote against the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in next month’s presidential election. It has been here before and last time things did not go well. Taiwan had its second direct presidential election in 2000 and the nation’s first ever transition of political power, with the KMT in opposition for the first time. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was ushered in with less than 40 percent of the vote, only marginally ahead of James Soong (宋楚瑜), the candidate of the then-newly formed People First Party (PFP), who got almost 37
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate and New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) has called on his Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) counterpart, William Lai (賴清德), to abandon his party’s Taiwanese independence platform. Hou’s remarks follow an article published in the Nov. 30 issue of Foreign Affairs by three US-China relations academics: Bonnie Glaser, Jessica Chen Weiss and Thomas Christensen. They suggested that the US emphasize opposition to any unilateral changes in the “status quo” across the Taiwan Strait, and that if Lai wins the election, he should consider freezing the Taiwanese independence clause. The concept of de jure independence was first
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) on Thursday reiterated that he is “deep-green at heart” and that he would mostly continue President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) national defense and foreign policies if elected. However, he was still seriously considering forming a “blue-white” electoral alliance with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) less than a month ago, telling students he “hates the KMT, but loathes the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) even more,” while constantly criticizing Tsai’s foreign policy these past few years. Many critics have said that Ko’s latest remarks were aimed at attracting green-leaning swing voters, as recent polls
Taiwan’s Ministry of Labor and India’s Ministry of External Affairs have confirmed that the two countries plan to sign a memorandum of understanding (MOU) this month on recruiting Indians to work in Taiwan. While this marks another step in deepening ties between the two nations, it has also stirred debate, as misunderstandings and disinformation about the plan abound. Taiwan is grappling with a shortage of workers due to a low birthrate and a society that is projected to turn super-aged by 2025. Official statistics show that Taiwan has a labor shortfall of at least 60,000 to 80,000, which is expected