“It’s the economy, stupid,” has been a political mantra for more than two decades. Nowadays, the phrase is repeated ad nauseam in development discussions. However, making countries flourish is not so simple.
There is a wealth of literature describing the various factors that determine prosperity. In their widely discussed book released last year, Why Nations Fail, the economist Daron Acemoglu and the political scientist James Robinson emphasized the importance of inclusive political and economic institutions. According to the economist Angus Deaton’s new book The Great Escape, health is a key.
The just-released Legatum Prosperity Index points to another fundamental condition for success: good governance and the rule of law. As Program Director Nathan Gamester said: “It pays to be a democracy.”
Twenty-seven of the world’s top 30 most prosperous countries are democracies. This is not true of the bottom 30.
Consider the development disparities in Africa. Countries such as Botswana that have accountable governments, respect for the rule of law, established property rights and independent judiciaries fare far better than their counterparts. However, most countries on the continent fall into the “counterpart” category, with 24 of the bottom 30 countries in the Prosperity Index located in sub-Saharan Africa.
Most of these countries suffer a significant “democratic deficit.” In Equatorial Guinea, for example, President Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo has been in power since 1979, making him Africa’s longest-serving ruler. In just over three decades, his regime has managed to turn a tiny, oil-rich country into a development disaster. The vast majority of Equatorial Guineans have severely limited access to clean water, education and health care. The country has one of the world’s highest child-mortality rates with one out of every five children dying before their fifth birthday.
Despite such examples — of which there are plenty — there is a school of thought that argues that the clumsy inclusiveness of the democratic process impedes economic development. Of course, it is true that democracy is not always efficient — just ask Americans, whose government was recently shut down for 16 days and nearly defaulted on its debt as a result of partisan policy disagreements. However, democratic systems based on good governance and the rule of law are more conducive to prosperity than any of the alternatives.
China’s unprecedented economic rise, which has lifted hundreds of millions of people out of poverty over the last three decades, was a result of economic decentralization and freer, more competitive markets — not clever government planning, as some like to claim. China’s future will almost certainly be characterized by more democracy and a strengthening of the rule of law — the country’s emerging middle-class will see to that. This shift will prove vital to consolidating and building upon economic gains.
Similarly, in Latin America, the consolidation of democratic governments over the past three decades has progressed in lock-step with economic development. Chile, Costa Rica and Uruguay all have positive stories to tell in this year’s Prosperity Index.
When governance is effective and the rule of law is strong, good things start to happen in other areas, including the economy. Botswanans, for example, report high levels of confidence in their country’s elections (83 percent, compared with the sub-Saharan regional average of just 47 percent) and judicial system (83 percent, compared with 53 percent).
And, lo and behold, progress is being made in several crucial areas. Mobile phone ownership in Botswana has nearly doubled in the past couple of years. (Can you imagine a thriving economy without modern communications?) And Botswana’s success in reducing business start-up costs since 2010 has given entrepreneurs the confidence to borrow money, hire more employees and take calculated risks on their way to success.
While there is no one-size-fits-all recipe for prosperity, it is apparent that establishing well-managed systems, guided by democratic principles, is a particularly effective route to progress in crucial areas like education, healthcare, security and regulation. By highlighting the factors that correlate with success, the Legatum Prosperity Index should spur policymakers and citizens to reconsider their priorities.
If they glean only one insight from this year’s index, it should be this: “It’s governance and the rule of law, stupid.”
Jeffrey Gedmin is president and CEO of the Legatum Institute.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
In the past 72 hours, US Senators Roger Wicker, Dan Sullivan and Ruben Gallego took to social media to publicly rebuke the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the defense budget. I understand that Taiwan’s head is on the chopping block, and the urgency of its security situation cannot be overstated. However, the comments from Wicker, Sullivan and Gallego suggest they have fallen victim to a sophisticated disinformation campaign orchestrated by an administration in Taipei that treats national security as a partisan weapon. The narrative fed to our allies claims the opposition is slashing the defense budget to kowtow to the Chinese
In a Taipei Times editorial published almost three years ago (“Macron goes off-piste,” April 13, 2023, page 8), French President Emmanuel Macron was criticized for comments he made immediately after meeting Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing. Macron had spoken of the need for his country to find a path on Chinese foreign policy no longer aligned with that of the US, saying that continuing to follow the US agenda would sacrifice the EU’s strategic autonomy. At the time, Macron was criticized for gifting Xi a PR coup, and the editorial said that he had been “persuaded to run
RSS