When ‘exclusive zones’ aren’t
I sometimes imagine walking into my living room and seeing a neighbor sitting down and watching TV. I then ask him what he is doing there and telling him that this is my “exclusive zone.” I imagine my neighbor agreeing with me, but then claiming that he is in his “exclusive zone” as well.
I would tell him that such a statement makes no sense, that by definition part of one person’s exclusive zone cannot also be part of someone else’s, only to have my neighbor argue that our “exclusive zones overlap.”
In this example, it is clear the neighbor is talking nonsense: To say that an area is part of an “overlapping exclusive zone” makes about as much sense as saying an island is a “big little island” or that a person is “fat thin person.” And yet the government, and indeed this newspaper, continue to use the term “overlapping exclusive zone” as if this actually means something.
This newspaper has many times printed articles regarding China’s claims to and occupation of islands in the West Philippine Sea. However, how are China’s actions in the West Philippine Sea fundamentally different from Taiwan’s actions in the East Philippine Sea? They are not.
Taiwan even threatened to send warships to the East Philippine Sea back in May, an action which would likely have resulted in the condemnation of Taiwan by the international community, which is presumably why it was called off.
For a country that wishes to have the international community recognize its sovereignty, it would be a good idea for Taiwan to recognize the sovereignty of its neighboring countries.
Martin Phipps
Greater Taichung
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have