Taiwanese audiences have been fascinated by the Japanese television drama Naoki Hanzawa, which depicts how a framed office worker takes revenge on his vicious supervisor, seemingly reflecting many people’s attitude toward upper management.
Naoki Hanzawa is a banker who is asked by his branch manager to be accountable for an unsecured loan of ¥500 million (US$5 million).
Facing the risk of being transferred and dismissed, Hanzawa does what he can to recover the loan, as well as hunt down evidence of the manager’s misconduct to prove his innocence.
Hanzawa’s best-known line — that the bad guys would “pay back double” — has been widely cited.
The TV series, which has been a huge hit both in Japan and Taiwan, appears to portray a common phenomenon in offices, in particular in East Asian countries, where lower-ranking employees have to take the blame for their supervisors’ bad decisions. Viewers can apparently relate to Hanzawa.
However, the most meaningful part of the story is not how the hard-working banker gets his revenge, but its message that people who do wrong must be held accountable.
A similar story is playing out in domestic politics as President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration can do no wrong, according to the government.
Manufacturers of substandard oil products are responsible for the recent food safety concerns, Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) said.
Criticized about the sluggish economy and failure to meet GDP growth goals and lower unemployment rates, Council for Economic Planning and Development Minister Kuan Chung-min (管中閔) explained why he did not resign: “You do not break a student’s legs if he fails to bring home the top student trophy” because winning the top honor “was only a goal.”
Kuan’s answer showed exactly why political accountability has suffered a serious setback in the past five years under Ma. Like Hanzawa’s boss, government officials can do no wrong and if something does go wrong, it is not their fault. After all, policy plans are just plans and officials should not have their legs broken if they fail to execute them.
That is why Prosecutor-General Huang Shih-ming (黃世銘) still has his job, despite being accused of leaking secrets and why former minister of transportation and communications Mao Chih-kuo (毛治國) was promoted to vice premier, rather than stepping down after several major accidents and construction mishaps.
Looking at the more than 100 officials who have been in the Cabinet over the past five years, only four ministers have been replaced or have resigned as a result of failing to fulfil their duties: former department of health ministers Lin Fang-yu (林芳郁) and Yaung Chih-liang (楊志良), former minister of justice Wang Ching-feng (王清峰) and former minister of national defense Kao Huah-chu (高華柱). Some quit for other reasons, such as former defense minister Andrew Yang (楊念祖) for plagiarism, former justice minister Tseng Yung-fu (曾勇夫) for alleged illegal lobbying and former finance minister Christina Liu (劉憶如) for ideological reasons.
However, none has done more harm to political accountability than Ma, who has not only refused to acknowledge failing to fulfill numerous campaign pledges, but keeps making new promises.
Perhaps he believes the saying: “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.”
Ma has also had blind faith in officials with whom he has close relationships, ignoring their incompetence. The phenomenon has already spread from the central government to the local level, bringing about the complete collapse of trust between the people and the government.
The “crime” is there. Now is the time for Taiwanese to look for their own Hanzawa and have the bad guys “pay back double.”
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
We are witnessing a sea change in the government’s approach to China, from one of reasonable, low-key reluctance at rocking the boat to a collapse of pretense over and patience in Beijing’s willful intransigence. Finally, we are seeing a more common sense approach in the face of active shows of hostility from a foreign power. According to Article 2 of the 2020 Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法), a “foreign hostile force” is defined as “countries, political entities or groups that are at war with or are engaged in a military standoff with the Republic of China [ROC]. The same stipulation applies to