The latest food scandal involving dubious cooking oils has shaken the public’s already precarious confidence in food safety and sparked speculation about the safety of the oil products they consume. Strengthening food inspection mechanisms and clarifying the issues surrounding edible oils should be a top priority for the government.
Since Chang Chi Foodstuff Factory Co and Flavor Full Food Inc were found to have blended refined cottonseed oil with edible oil products to reduce production costs, the Ministry of Health and Welfare and prosecutors are scrambling to hold the two manufacturers responsible, while conducting inspections of all 163 edible oil producers in the nation.
In the meantime, misinformation has abounded over the edibility of cottonseed oil and ingredients in other edible oils from the two companies, creating more confusion among the public.
Several doctors have questioned the ministry’s claim that the cottonseed oil contained no gossypol, which causes infertility after refinement. The purification process is no guarantee that the end product would be 100 percent gossypol-free cottonseed oil, they said.
An online article posted on Friday by psychiatrist Billy Pan (潘建志) from Taipei’s Wanfang Hospital attracted attention. He questioned the dramatic increase in the amount of imported cottonseed oil and cottonseed oil cakes in the past two years.
The dramatic rise in the amount of cottonseed oil and cottonseed oil cakes imported does not match some oil manufacturers’ claims that all their products containing cottonseed oil are for export, he said, adding that the oil cakes could be mixed with edible oil products.
Citing an anonymous whistle-blower, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Wei Ming-ku (魏明谷) said that Chang Chi used imported broad beans from Vietnam and Thailand and mixed them with moldy shiitake mushroom stripes and long-frozen imported fish to make satay sauce.
While these warnings were meant to raise awareness of food safety and press the authorities to enhance their inspections, fast-paced information sharing on social networks and massive media coverage on the issue led to public confusion and anxiety before there was evidence to support the reports.
The public has lost trust in food regulators and turned to other sources for food information because of the string of food safety scares. The government must perform its duty and clearly explain each incident to the public.
The government needs to clarify if refined cottonseed oils are edible, whether adulterated oils are harmful, the difference between cottonseed oil and gossypol, and what cottonseed oil cakes are being used for. It should enhance its communication with the public and the food industry, and offer transparent and up-to-date information on its food inspections to regain the public’s trust.
Allowing rumors and speculation to multiply and leaving the public in a panic about food safety is the worst thing to do.
The government should improve inspections and management of large food manufactures and their major clients.
Responding to the cooking oil cases by inspecting their use at restaurants and night markets only spreads fear. These kinds of measures will not prevent more food safety scandals.
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has
RSS