Yet another food scandal has hit Taiwan, adding to the plasticizers in drinks scare, Top Pot Bakery’s lies about not using artificial flavorings and Sunsuivi Organic Rice being mixed with inferior, imported rice.
The most recent scandal involves cooking oil packaged by Chang Chi Foodstuff Factory Co. Chang Chi’s olive oil has no association with olives, there are no peanuts involved in the making of its peanut oil and its chili oil has no link to chilies. Instead, these flavors were achieved using artificial additives, prompting doubts about if they are safe to cook with.
Chang Chi does not have a very large share of the cooking oil market, but its products are sold at a low price and are therefore attractive to low and middle-income consumers. Even more disconcerting is that they are sold in bulk at discounted prices to processed food manufacturers, restaurants, self-service buffets, lunchbox outlets and kitchens in schools and military mess halls. This means that it does not matter how much care one takes in buying cooking oil from the supermarket because one has virtually no control over the quality of oil used in processed food or in restaurants.
The Cabinet responded to the oil scandal by calling the relevant authorities to a special meeting on food safety and announcing a raft of food safety control measures. It has also promised severe punishments for those involved in the oil scandal. Chang Chi’s and its owner’s financial assets have been frozen and are being audited, and the company is to be dealt with in line with the recently amended Act Governing Food Sanitation (食品衛生管理法).
The government is also planning to set up a joint task force on food safety checks and bans, as well as revise regulations governing food sanitation and safety controls to require that manufacturers carry out sample testing in-house or at a third-party lab and reinforce manufacturer self-regulation.
According to the act, Chang Chi may be facing a fine of more than NT$28 million (US$952,000). While this sounds like an astronomical figure, it is small change compared with the more than NT$700 million in profit that the company would have made from its blended oil and so is hardly an effective deterrent.
A precedent for this type of case was set by the class-action suit brought against companies using plasticizers in drinks. The suit called for NT$7.8 billion in compensation, but the courts only awarded NT$1.2 million, which is a cause for concern in terms of the government’s and the court’s ability to seek compensation for crimes. If sanctions are to be a deterrent, they should not only involve punitive fines, but also seek the return of illegally gained profits.
Chang Chi’s wrongdoing was not discovered through random checks by the authorities, nor was it discovered because the products failed to meet the nation’s Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) standards. Instead Chang Chi was exposed because someone reported the company to Taipei’s Department of Health, which fined it NT$40,000 in October last year, and because Changhua County’s Public Health Bureau, after receiving further complaints in June, referred the firm to prosecutors.
Had these whistle-blowers not come forward, Chang Chi’s oils would have passed government inspections and received GMP certification. The government must improve food safety tests so each item and the whole production process are inspected, because if any loopholes exist, unscrupulous people will find a way to exploit them.
Chemical additives such as plasticizers and artificial flavoring can easily fool tests and it is not easy to identify illegal constituents in products unless inspectors are testing for specific items. If the government wants to protect society from further food scares, the simplest way is to increase rewards for whistle-blowers. If people with inside knowledge have more incentive to report illegal activities, ensuring food safety will be much easier.
The Cabinet on Nov. 6 approved a NT$10 billion (US$318.4 million) four-year plan to build tourism infrastructure in mountainous areas and the south. Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) on Tuesday announced that the Ministry of Transportation and Communications would offer weekday accommodation discounts, birthday specials and other domestic travel incentives beginning next March, aiming to encourage more travel outside the usual weekend and holiday peaks. The government is right to focus on domestic tourism. Although the data appear encouraging on the surface — as total domestic trips are up compared with their pre-COVID-19 pandemic numbers — a closer look tells a different
For more than seven decades, the Chinese Communist Party has claimed to govern Tibet with benevolence and progress. I have seen the truth behind the slogans. I have listened to the silences of monks forbidden to speak of the Dalai Lama, watched the erosion of our language in classrooms, and felt the quiet grief of a people whose prayers are monitored and whose culture is treated as a threat. That is why I will only accept complete independence for Tibet. The so-called “autonomous region” is autonomous in name only. Decisions about religion, education and cultural preservation are made in Beijing, not
Apart from the first arms sales approval for Taiwan since US President Donald Trump took office, last month also witnessed another milestone for Taiwan-US relations. Trump signed the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act into law on Tuesday. Its passing without objection in the US Senate underscores how bipartisan US support for Taiwan has evolved. The new law would further help normalize exchanges between Taiwanese and US government officials. We have already seen a flurry of visits to Washington earlier this summer, not only with Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍), but also delegations led by National Security Council Secretary-General Joseph Wu
I recently watched a panel discussion on Taiwan Talks in which the host rightly asked a critical question: Why is the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (IPAC) spearheading a robust global movement to reject China’s ongoing distortion of UN Resolution 2758? While the discussion offered some context, a more penetrating analysis and urgent development was missed. The IPAC action is not merely a political gesture; it is an essential legal and diplomatic countermeasure to China’s escalating and fundamentally baseless campaign to manufacture a claim over Taiwan through the deliberate misinterpretation of a 1971 UN resolution. Since the inauguration of Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) as
RSS