The reunification issue
On Tuesday, the Chinese Communist Party celebrated the anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic of China (PRC). For some of its spectators, the anniversary marks the victorious conclusion brought about by Mao Zedong (毛澤東) during the vicious civil war fought more than 60 years ago. However, for many other viewers, the anniversary is a stark and unfortunate reminder of the ousting of Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and his supporters as they relocated to Taiwan. In light of the celebrations, the overarching question of reunification between China and Taiwan lingers.
The 64th anniversary of the PRC is a celebration of Mao and his accomplishments. Immediately after Mao established his government, he set out to reunify China. However, Mao was stymied by then-US president Harry Truman who ordered the US Seventh Fleet to the Taiwan Strait — halting Mao’s plan of an amphibious assault on Taiwan. Decades later, as Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood solemnly on the famed Tiananmen Square acknowledging the past accomplishments of the victorious revolutionary deeds of Mao, Taiwan remains a democratic and independent nation, a sobering reminder of Mao’s failure.
Even as steps are taken to resolve one of the most contentious legacies left by Mao, many still have mixed emotions regarding reunification. Heated debates abound over the most significant bilateral accord since the landmark Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) — the service trade agreement which would allow each side to invest in each other’s service sectors.
Democratic Progressive Party lawmakers, who represent a significant number of the population, earlier last month sought to boycott a review of the service trade agreement. The party’s concern is that the agreement — which some observers view as China’s carrot-style approach toward reunification — may have an adverse effect on the local job market. A concern not without merit, it highlights anxieties over steps toward reunification.
Perhaps a more striking example of how reunification remains a pertinent issue can be seen in a piece penned by former American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) chairman Nat Bellocchi. In the opinion piece published on Monday (“Beijing threatens freedom in Taiwan, Sept. 30, page 8), the former AIT chairman argues that Xi is engaged in ideological warfare, seeking to eradicate Western values and is a threat to the freedom of Taiwan.
Whether the Chinese president is actually engaged in ideological warfare lies outside the scope of this discussion. However, that discourse surrounding Taiwan’s reunification with China and its implications continues to emerge as a constant theme is evident.
Chinese leadership will continue to seek new ways in which to resolve one of Mao’s most contentious legacies. Conversely, people in Taiwan — many of whom identify themselves as Taiwanese — will seek to secure their ethnic identity, traditions, customs and political values. Succinctly stated, reunification between China and Taiwan is far from devolving into an inconsequential relic of the Cold War. The issue lingers to this day.
Mycal Ford
Greater Kaohsiung
Stop cruel rabies tests
I am writing to ask that the Council of Agriculture halt plans to give rabies to beagle puppies. The proposed experiments are cruel and unnecessary. Rabies research can and should be conducted without harming animals.
If the experiments go ahead, these unfortunate animals will have to endure the severe effects of the rabies virus, which include anxiety, confusion, painful muscle spasms, paralysis and death. Instead, the council should be working to determine whether current rabies vaccines are also protective against this strain of the virus.
Non-animal laboratory procedures can address this issue quickly, without killing any animals.
Please end plans for these cruel experiments on puppies.
Mme Rousseaud
France
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
In the past 72 hours, US Senators Roger Wicker, Dan Sullivan and Ruben Gallego took to social media to publicly rebuke the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the defense budget. I understand that Taiwan’s head is on the chopping block, and the urgency of its security situation cannot be overstated. However, the comments from Wicker, Sullivan and Gallego suggest they have fallen victim to a sophisticated disinformation campaign orchestrated by an administration in Taipei that treats national security as a partisan weapon. The narrative fed to our allies claims the opposition is slashing the defense budget to kowtow to the Chinese
In a Taipei Times editorial published almost three years ago (“Macron goes off-piste,” April 13, 2023, page 8), French President Emmanuel Macron was criticized for comments he made immediately after meeting Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing. Macron had spoken of the need for his country to find a path on Chinese foreign policy no longer aligned with that of the US, saying that continuing to follow the US agenda would sacrifice the EU’s strategic autonomy. At the time, Macron was criticized for gifting Xi a PR coup, and the editorial said that he had been “persuaded to run
RSS