The latest scandal over President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) abuse of power in his bid to oust the legislative speaker from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has created a national crisis. When society turns its focus to political disputes between political figures, it damages political and constitutional democracy.
Ma wants to force Legislative Speaker Wan Jin-pyng (王金平) out for failing to push through a proposed cross-strait service trade agreement, the referendum on the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in Gongliao District (貢寮), New Taipei City (新北市), and others such as a peace agreement and other China-related policies.
For such reasons, without even waiting for the judiciary to handle the allegations of improper lobbying, the president intervened in the judicial process by removing the speaker and sending a warning to others, which triggered the political turmoil.
The president also issued press statements praising the Legislative Yuan, as if he were now in charge of it.
According to the constitution, there is only one power granted to the president in relation to the legislature — if it were to resign en masse, the president can dismiss the legislative body. The independent power of the legislature is described in the Council of Grand Justices’ Interpretation No. 342 (www.judicial.gov.tw/constitutionalcourt/EN/p03_01.asp?expno=342).
With Ma concurrently serving as president and KMT chairman, he has created political disputes, abused his power and breached the principle of separation of powers. This has created a serious constitutional crisis, transforming a democracy into a dictatorship.
If there is a case of improper lobbying, it must be handled by the Legislative Yuan because it is an autonomous and self-
governing body. Its members must collectively decide whether any from among them should be investigated.
It is not acceptable for a prosecutor to visit the president and for the president to take the matter into his own hands. He must make decisions after consulting other government bodies.
This is clearly a case in which “the legislative power has been encroached on by the executive power” and of the “executive power encroaching on the judicial process.” Ma’s actions are a poor precedent for the nation’s constitutional rights.
The greatest cause for concern is the potential collapse of a new democracy. If this were to happen, the legislature would be controlled by the president. Ma could unilaterally determine the nation’s future, including on cross-strait issues.
The allegation of improper lobbying is a case that should be handled by the legislative and judicial bodies. The legislature’s power cannot be pushed aside and the independence of the judiciary cannot be used as a weapon for political infighting. The Legislative Yuan must set out to defend its autonomy and independence to fulfill its constitutional duties, and it must stop Ma from continuing to disregard and encroach on the legislative and judicial processes.
Regardless of party affiliations, legislators must exhaust all constitutional channels — including immediately passing a legislative condemnation — request explanations from the higher courts and, according to the constitutional law, review the regulation regarding impeachment of the president.
Lawmakers must consider taking a further step by impeaching the president and recalling the Cabinet to fight Ma’s violations of the Constitution.
Cheng Li-chiun is a Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
RSS