The government has spoken about how to improve the nation’s financial health, after its annual budget plan, approved last month, indicated a shortfall of NT$273.9 billion (US$9.18 billion) for next year, which will be the first increase in the deficit in five years. Moreover, President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration is proposing its first-ever share sale plan for state-run banks and bluechip companies to increase revenues.
The latest statistics show that national debt amounted to NT$5.377 trillion at the end of last month and it is approaching the debt ceiling of NT$5.702 trillion, or 40.6 percent of the average GDP for the past three years. Minster of Finance Chang Sheng-ford (張盛和) last week said the ministry was drafting plans to both control the growth of government debt and expand its revenue sources in compliance with the Public Debt Act (公共債務法).
His remarks came after Council for Economic Planning and Development Minister Kuan Chung-ming (管中閔) said late last month that the council was proposing measures to increase government revenue. Among the measures they proposed is the sale of
government-owned stocks. An initial plan for such sales includes a total of NT$44.1 billion shares in Taiwan Cooperative Financial Holding Co, Mega Financial Holding Co, China Steel Corp, Chunghwa Telecom Co and Taiwan Fertilizer Co.
The finance ministry says the government aims to sell other stock in companies that carry no policy initiatives or in which the government is not a majority shareholder, such as Central Deposit Insurance Corp and Taiwan Land Development Corp. The second-
stage share sale is also part of the government’s privatization drive for state-run companies, following the successful privatization of Taiwan Salt Co, Chunghwa Telecom, China Shipbuilding Corp and Taiwan Cooperative Bank during former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) administration from 2000 to 2008.
Before getting too excited about the sale plan, which still has uncertainties due to opposition from labor unions and its need for approval by lawmakers, the government must realize that the main purpose of selling its stocks should be to loosen its control over those companies, rather than earn money.
Government officials have correctly said that insufficient revenues are a key factor to the nation’s fiscal difficulties. Unfortunately they still refuse to face up to the real issue in the current tax structure: A fast-shrinking tax base and too many tax breaks, which have seriously diminished the government’s finances.
Like its peers elsewhere in the world, the government favors tax cuts, as well as increases in social security and pension-related spending, to win approval from businesses and the public. However, it is time for the government to review its generous tax cuts and welfare spending.
While policymakers believe their ideas will increase the productivity of individuals and corporations, the truth is that its policies have led to higher, not lower, budget deficits. The increase in tax revenues has not kept pace with economic growth over the past five years.
Tax equity should be the fundamental policy of any government. If tax cuts only benefit rich people and large companies and increase the tax burden on low and middle-income earners and small businesses, the government must end such unfair policies immediately.
Its obligation under the Constitution is to provide the majority of people, rather than only a prosperous minority, with a sound living environment. With the seven-in-one elections at the end of next year, the government must be careful to walk the path of fiscal discipline rather than toward a fiscal cliff.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In the opening remarks of her meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Friday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) framed her visit as a historic occasion. In his own remarks, Xi had also emphasized the history of the relationship between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Where they differed was that Cheng’s account, while flawed by its omissions, at least partially corresponded to reality. The meeting was certainly historic, albeit not in the way that Cheng and Xi were signaling, and not from the perspective