This is an age obsessed with performance measures and rankings. Everything and everyone is subject to some type of externally applied, so-called objective assessment of value and quality.
What are the top five mobile phones? What are the 10 most popular films? What are the top 10 restaurants in Taipei?
Therefore, it is no surprise that universities also get ranked.
The highly respected QS World 500 University Rankings for this year have been published. It is fascinating to discover which universities are considered “world class.” British and North American universities dominate, but what about Asian universities?
It is surprising to learn which Asian country tops this year’s rankings: It is Taiwan.
Taiwan now has 10 universities in the top 500. Not bad for a country barely 50 years old and with a population of 23 million. By comparison, South Korea has 10 universities in the top 500, but with double the population of Taiwan; Japan has 16, but with five times the population; China has 17, but with 50 times the population. Malaysia, a country with a similar population to Taiwan, has just five universities in the top 500.
Taiwan’s higher education system is a success story by any measure — it is certainly now punching above its weight. Why might this be? Perhaps a clue is contained in the city of Taipei.
Taipei is not the most exotic city in Asia, nor is it the most exciting and it certainly is not on most travelers’ destination wishlists. Taipei may be an underestimated city, but it is the best in Asia.
What measures am I, a British university professor, applying in order to make this subjective assessment?
Taipei has all the characteristics of a top university. It is organized, ambitious, smart, innovative, technological, adaptive, sophisticated, secular and inhabited by very intelligent people. Taipei works perfectly, as must any organization if it is to succeed, including a university.
I have been observing the nation’s universities’ rapid climb in the rankings for years — last year Taiwan had seven universities in the top 500 — but what continues to surprise me is that Taiwan does not publicize this more. Whenever I tell Westerners that Taiwan has so many world class universities, I am invariably met with looks of incredulity.
Taiwan needs to shout about this success a little more loudly, so that the message is heard outside of Asia: Taiwan’s universities are up there with the best in the world.
Stephen Whitehead is a visiting professor of gender studies at Shih Hsin University.
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
RSS