Let Taiwanese be happy
If Taiwanese are happy, leave them alone and let them be happy (“Happy index not a true reflection,” Sept. 2, page 8).
It does not seem possible, economically or politically, that Taiwanese are happier than Japanese and South Koreans. One thing for sure, and pertinent, is that Taiwanese are happier than Chinese.
A good, smart government always tries its best to make its people happy. Unfortunately, President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration has done many things against the public’s will.
Here are some examples: The so-called “one China” policy is trying to convert Taiwanese into Chinese; the service trade agreement with China will allow Chinese to take over local jobs; the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has many illegal party assets to fund elections; corruption cases are treated differently according to political affiliation; the government acts like an enemy, infringing on property and human rights; the electromagnetic wave irradiation of farmlands is a health hazard for farmers; and finally, Ma seldom keeps his campaign promises and has failed to make Taiwan a “normal” country.
Fighting for citizenship
Article 15 (1) of the Universal Human Rights Declaration says everyone has the right to a nationality. What is the nationality of people from Taiwan?
A Taiwanese student at Oslo University, Lu Yu-ta (呂昱達), ached at being registered as a citizen of the People’s Republic of China. His complaints were ignored by the Norwegian police and immigration authorities.
Lu became frustrated and said: “Although we are granted visa-free access to 140 countries, it is sad that we must suffer through not being recognized as citizens of an independent country.”
Lu has issued a wake-up call for all Taiwanese to face their citizenship.
Citizenship awareness is closely tied to the nation’s future. What does the younger generation dream of? Everyone, like Lu, dreams of being a citizen of a nation called Taiwan with the pride of UN membership. Unfortunately, people have been under the KMT’s brainwashing program for 68 years, which says the Republic of China (ROC) is an independent sovereign state and Taiwan is a province of its territory. The reality is that the ROC is not an independent country, but an exiled government without international recognition.
In the e-generation, people can easily verify historical records. There is no international treaty or legal document declaring that sovereignty over Taiwan has been transferred from Japan to the ROC. President Ma said Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) did ask for Taiwan’s sovereignty in the Cairo declaration and under the Taipei treaty, Japan transfered Taiwan sovereignty to the ROC in 1952.
However, the Cairo declaration was only a news release. Japan renounced all rights, titles and claims to Formosa and the Pescadores on Sept. 8, 1951 in the San Francisco Peace Treaty.
The US military government was named as the principal occupying power. There was no resolution passed by the ROC’s National Assembly or the Legislative Yuan to record Taiwan as annexed territory. There is no proof that the ROC has sovereignty over Taiwan. It is no wonder the international community refer to the ROC as Chinese Taipei; the Chinese exiled government in Taipei.
Why is the nation referred to as Chinese Taipei and not Formosa or Taiwan? That is the puzzle the younger generation needs to solve. They have been educated as Chinese, but the real world tells them they are Formosan.
Sixty-two years ago, on Sept. 5, 1951, three days before the signing of the San Francisco treaty, then-US secretary of state John Foster Dulles said “the foundation for this peace was laid by the many who gave up their lives in faith that the very magnitude of their sacrifice would compel those who survived to find and take the way to peace.”
World War II is over everywhere except in Taiwan. Taiwanese are entitled to self-determination. Hopefully, activist group Citizen 1985 will continue to declare “injustice,” “anger” and “we want truth” to help Lu fight for his nationality claim and to finally define Taiwan’s status.
Speaking at the Asia-Pacific Forward Forum in Taipei, former Singaporean minister for foreign affairs George Yeo (楊榮文) proposed a “Chinese commonwealth” as a potential framework for political integration between Taiwan and China. Yeo said the “status quo” in the Taiwan Strait is unsustainable and that Taiwan should not be “a piece on the chessboard” in a geopolitical game between China and the US. Yeo’s remark is nothing but an ill-intentioned political maneuver that is made by all pro-China politicians in Singapore. Since when does a Southeast Asian nation have the right to stick its nose in where it is not wanted
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has released a plan to economically integrate China’s Fujian Province with Taiwan’s Kinmen County, outlining a cross-strait development project based on six major themes and 21 measures. This official document by the CCP is directed toward Taiwan’s three outlying island counties: Penghu County, Lienchiang County (Matsu) and Kinmen County. The plan sets out to construct a cohabiting sphere between Kinmen and the nearby Chinese city of Xiamen, as well as between Matsu and Fuzhou. It also aims to bring together Minnanese cultural areas including Taiwan’s Penghu and China’s cities of Quanzhou and Zhangzhou for further integrated
During a recent visit to Taiwan, I encountered repeated questions about “America skepticism” among the body politic. The basic premise of the “America skepticism” theory is that Taiwan people should view the United States as an unreliable, self-interested actor who is using Taiwan for its own purposes. According to this theory, America will abandon Taiwan when its interests are advanced by doing so. At one level, such skepticism is a sign of a healthy, well-functioning democratic society that protects the right for vigorous political debate. Indeed, around the world, the people of Taiwan are far from alone in debating America’s reliability
As China’s economy was meant to drive global economic growth this year, its dramatic slowdown is sounding alarm bells across the world, with economists and experts criticizing Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for his unwillingness or inability to respond to the nation’s myriad mounting crises. The Wall Street Journal reported that investors have been calling on Beijing to take bolder steps to boost output — especially by promoting consumer spending — but Xi has deep-rooted philosophical objections to Western-style consumption-driven growth, seeing it as wasteful and at odds with his goal of making China a world-leading industrial and technological powerhouse, and