Sun, Sep 01, 2013 page8

• Trade agreement threatens Internet

  • By Lin Ying-dar 林盈達
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  The US and India have both decided, following national security reviews, to ban equipment made in China from being installed in the server rooms of major telecommunications companies and Internet service providers. Therefore, it came as a surprise when Taiwan, during its negotiations on the Cross-Strait Agreement on Trade in Services earlier this year, came up with plans to allow Chinese capital investment in local category-2 telecommunications companies.

  Considering the data security concerns with Chinese-made equipment, how can we allow Chinese capital to be invested directly in upstream Internet and communications service providers and to provide such services in Taiwan?

  While Taiwan prepares to take this foolish step, most people — even government officials and legislators — do not realize that this clause of the service trade agreement is a Trojan horse strategy of the electronic age.

  Taiwan’s negotiators think that category-1 telecommunications service providers are more important than category-2 providers, so we should only open up the less important category. It is true that category-1 companies — telephone companies that have their own physical lines — operate on a larger scale than those in category 2 — those that do not have physical phone lines, but lease them. However, for many people Internet communications have become more important than telephone calls, and Internet services are precisely the area that we are going to open up to Chinese investment.

  According to the terms of the service trade agreement, Taiwan will not allow Chinese businesses to run closed networks leased by members of the public engaged in certain kinds of business. The fact that the Chinese side conceded to this shows that it has given up on the idea of directly running client services in Taiwan, and will instead follow the path of indirect investment as a way of obtaining seats on the boards of Taiwanese companies and having those win contracts to do business on their behalf.

  Furthermore, Taiwanese companies, influenced by threats and inducements from the Chinese government, may well sacrifice the interests of Taiwanese service users in order to obtain Chinese telecommunications network licenses. China is initially only allowing Taiwanese companies to offer services in its Fujian Province. Later, when Taiwanese companies want to extend their investments to other provinces, they may be forced to contract network services out to Chinese companies that obtain licenses to operate category-2 telecommunications in Taiwan. This would allow Chinese operators to gain control over a large number of Taiwanese users’ network communications, so personal and business details could be passed to the Chinese government when it demanded them.

  Taiwanese companies may also be pressured into allowing Chinese to invest indirectly which would help them in acquiring seats on local boards of directors and grant them influence over operations. This would give investors sufficient influence to interfere in the running of Taiwanese operators and allow the Chinese government to act as a de facto policymaker.

  Another possibility is that Taiwanese operators might open backdoors to their own network communications systems so that departments favored by the Chinese government could penetrate those systems and collect users’ communications data.

  The Chinese government controls its Internet more tightly than any other country. It is easy for the authorities there to keep tabs on individual and business users and to influence them.

  China is Taiwan’s opponent both politically and militarily. How can Taiwan hand over its communications and network systems, which form the nation’s neural network, to Chinese companies that can so easily be controlled by the Chinese government? This scenario is a modern-day Trojan horse strategy, by which China seeks to gain control over Taiwan’s neural network under the guise of market deregulation.

  Above all, the Chinese government wishes to monitor and control politicians, opinion leaders and other prominent social figures in Taiwan. Politicians, including legislators and officials, are going to be targeted whether they belong to the pan-blue or pan-green political camps.

  When the time comes, the Chinese government will be able to use its access to sensitive information to coerce legislators and officials into acting in accordance with its wishes. This trend heralds the same kind of disaster for Taiwanese people as the Trojan horse brought to the people of ancient Troy.

  Lin Ying-dar is a professor in National Chiao Tung University’s computer science department.

  Translated by Julian Clegg
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Jeers as Real Madrid fall 2-1 to Man City

  • 2

    Taiwanese tourists go viral in video during Japan quake

  • 3

    Climber to attempt free solo of 101

  • 4

    YouBike to require insurance for all riders from Jan. 1

  • 5

    US military might ‘waning,’ editorial says