There is a feeling of discontent pervading Taiwan of late, with mass street protests over the death of army corporal Hung Chung-chiu (洪仲丘) and the forced demolitions of houses in Miaoli County’s Dapu Borough (大埔) precipitating a Cabinet reshuffle. Even the Control Yuan, usually so reluctant to get involved in the news, has made headlines over its failure to impeach Keelung Mayor Chang Tong-rong (張通榮).
The affair started when Chang attempted to intervene in the case of a woman accused of drunk driving. Chang was caught on video — later posted on YouTube — lambasting the police over the case. The Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Evaluation and Discipline Committee suspended Chang for three months, while a court found him guilty of influence peddling and sentenced him to one year and eight months in prison.
Despite a consensus that Chang acted inappropriately, and irrespective of the fact he was found guilty, the Control Yuan failed to vote to impeach him, twice.
Angered and frustrated, Control Yuan President Wang Chien-shien (王建煊) was moved to tell the media that perhaps the nation would be better off without the Control Yuan, saying it was a body in which people were given positions as political rewards. His remarks were condemned by 19 Control Yuan members.
At this point, legislators entered the fray, with some even proposing a constitutional amendment to abolish the Control Yuan, reducing the constitutional branches of the government to three and transferring its powers of investigation and oversight to the legislature.
With some officials bent on dismantling the government, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), currently overseas, was obliged to make an urgent telephone call home to try to calm the situation before things got out of hand.
The Control Yuan only has itself to blame. Chang’s behavior was there for all to see on YouTube and any normal person could see that he did not have a leg to stand on, morally speaking.
Prosecutors thought Chang’s behavior sufficiently dubious to take him to court, where he was found guilty of abusing his position, and although he has yet to appeal, the criminality of his actions is apparent.
After much discussion, Control Yuan members voted on two occasions not to impeach him, although they have not publicly said why. The vote not only failed to meet public expectations, it also runs counter to the law and might not be welcomed even within the KMT.
Such a result was always going to stir up doubt among the public about the effectiveness of the Control Yuan. Rumors of Chang paying for dinners for Control Yuan members have only added to this.
The Control Yuan has 29 members. The annual bill for their combined salaries is NT$76.7 million (US$2.56 million), an average of NT$2.64 million each.
Since 2008 the Control Yuan has cost the taxpayer NT$4.5 billion, investigating 200 impeachments, each costing on average NT$22.5 million. Most of the officials investigated have been relatively small fry, and 70 percent got off with a reprimand.
Far from bagging tigers, the Control Yuan finds swatting flies challenging, and when it features in the news, it is mostly for members criticizing each other.
Ironically, the biggest beast it has brought down recently was its own former secretary-general, Chen Feng-yi (陳豐義), early last month.
The Control Yuan does not enjoy a great reputation at the best of times. Its members do not have anything like the integrity and fortitude of people like Tao Pai-chuan (陶百川), a Control Yuan member in the Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) era who did not fear authority and dared to speak his mind when it came to rooting out corruption and correcting government policy.
No wonder many people feel that the Control Yuan’s golden age was in the days of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), whose member nomination list was blocked in the legislature for so long by the KMT that the Control Yuan was memberless for years.
Taiwanese just do not need it.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
RSS