Bad leadership and science
The news that “experts” from the US are to arrive in Taiwan to advise the government (“Rabies found in four more Formosan ferret badgers,” Aug. 9, page 3) on the rabies outbreak is puzzling — although the story turns out to be one of familiar government bumbling and incompetence.
In the last 10 years, rabies has been quickly, safely and effectively eradicated from Estonia and Italy. They used a bait developed in France from a less virulent strain of the virus. The bait meets high EU standards. The bait’s advantage is that it may be used for many species — including dogs. The solution to the urgent issue of vaccinating the growing numbers of stray dogs in Taiwan is very clear, except to those working for the Council of Agriculture. The bait for stray dogs, at least, could have been on its way by now.
The problem is that, rather than get experts already in Taiwan to sequence the RNA and analyze the data, or simply listen to what others more qualified than them are telling them, the council has its own chosen people that are there, not because of merit or expertise, but because of cronyism or simply because they have passed the civil service exam.
So, when the council issued its report that declared the strain of rabies to be close to that found in China, it was clear to professionals in Taiwan that the report lacked the necessary scientific rigor. They sequenced part of the RNA, but for reasons best known to themselves they highlighted only the matches with the Chinese strain. It was a straightforward matter to run the data through a database to find that, in actual fact, the strain is closer to one found in the Philippines.
Hence also their confusion as to whether a rabies bait that meets European standards is good enough. Given that EU standards meet and often exceed US standards, this causes unnecessary delay by people who are not sufficiently informed to make a decision.
Their conclusion, stated in the same Taipei Times article, that the virus has been “lurking in mountainous areas for years” may be true — but this conclusion cannot be based on the analysis they have so far released, because so little of the RNA has been sequenced, and only the council’s own analysis has been published. No reasons have been offered for why only a small sample was sequenced. No one else, such as the qualified scientists Taiwan already has, outside of the government and its cronies, have been invited to sequence the RNA.
This is bad science. Science requires a transparent process showing a clear method and making available all raw data (not just analysis or interpretation).
It is also bad governance. Good governance also requires transparency, and it requires the government to make use of the best people in technical matters — not a privileged few who do not have the expertise, but who do find themselves in government jobs.
If this is just rabies, one wonders about the more weighty issues of the day, such as sweeping economic deals with other countries.
Name withheld at author’s request
Not a vegetarian paradise
Taiwan is a sort of “vegetarian paradise,” but the statistics for the island seem to indicate that the exact opposite is true.
Taiwan has an astoundingly high rate of both pork production and poultry production — these figures are both unbelievably high in absolute numbers and when the per capita ratio is compared to other countries in Asia.
Only a small percentage of people share my ethical concerns about this industry (I am a strict vegan), but the ecological and economic ramifications should be of real interest.
As with many other agricultural industries on the island, Taiwan’s pork production is not for export (or, we may say, it is not viable as an export industry, a profound problem that now haunts even Taiwanese rice-farming). In 2011, a puny 0.5 percent of Taiwanese pork was exported. (Meanwhile, Taiwan continues to import increasing quantities of pork, while producing more than twice the rate of pork per person than Korea or Japan!)
The industrialization of poultry farming has also increased its output on the island and, similarly, Taiwan has increased its imports of poultry. Taiwanese are eating enormous numbers of dead birds, compared to nearby South Korea and Japan.
The UN has repeatedly drawn attention to the environmental implications of these industries, in terms of land use, water use, even air pollution and increasing rates of disease.
The statistical charts I made to illustrate this problem are at the following links (all sources are either official FAO data, or else ROC Department of Agriculture data):
http://vegan-mind-tricks.tumblr.com/post/57790237292/taiwan-korea-and-japan-paradise-for-some-the
http://vegan-mind-tricks.tumblr.com/post/57639878082/ive-mentioned-taiwan-as-both-vegan-paradise-and
I would encourage your readers and your journalists to take an interest in this changing aspect of the economy, ecology and culture of Taiwan.
Eisel Mazard
Perpignan, France
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The National Development Council (NDC) on Wednesday last week launched a six-month “digital nomad visitor visa” program, the Central News Agency (CNA) reported on Monday. The new visa is for foreign nationals from Taiwan’s list of visa-exempt countries who meet financial eligibility criteria and provide proof of work contracts, but it is not clear how it differs from other visitor visas for nationals of those countries, CNA wrote. The NDC last year said that it hoped to attract 100,000 “digital nomads,” according to the report. Interest in working remotely from abroad has significantly increased in recent years following improvements in