Rub-a-dub-dub, there are too many ducks in the tub. Dutch artist Florentijn Hofman says the aim of his giant Rubber Duck art installation is to spread joy. However, the giant yellow inflatable has sparked an unseemly battle of the cities that could leave Taiwan feeling flatter than a dish of pressed duck.
Hofman said 23 cities and organizations from Taiwan contacted him after a 16.5m tall version of his duck created a frenzy in Hong Kong in May, along with scores of other requests from around the world. Keelung’s announcement last month that it had reached an agreement to have a specially created Hofman duck docked in its harbor from mid-December to late January was trumped on Monday by Greater Kaohsiung Mayor Chen Chu’s (陳菊) signing of a contract with Hofman to have a duck in her city from Sept. 19 to Oct. 20.
Chen said the duck, based on what happened in Hong Kong, was expected to attract 3 million tourists to her city, who would bring in about NT$1 billion (US$33.3 million). Those would appear to be numbers as inflatable as the PVC duck they are based upon. Will 3 million people in Taiwan really crowd to Glory Pier to see a massive bathtub toy when they can see another one at the end of the year? Not to mention that Taoyuan County is also relying on a duck for its Taoyuan Land Art Festival from Oct. 26 to Nov. 10, and Greater Taichung has high hopes for one as well.
Kaohsiung and Keelung should not count on attracting hordes of Chinese travelers desperate for a photograph with a giant anatid. The lure of the duck for the Chinese will probably be tempered by the fact that Hofman has announced that China will be getting its own Beijing duck on Sept. 16. One is also in the works for Chongqing, according to the artist’s Facebook page.
The claims that Kaohsiung and Keelung will be getting custom-made ducks, albeit 1.5m taller than the one that graced Victoria Harbour, is just public relations fluff. Part of Hofman’s contract is that each duck be produced locally, along with the stipulation that it must always be on water and that it cannot be commercialized. That might prove problematic for the corporations that Chen said she is planning to hit up to cover the duck’s bill. Most companies that help fund artistic endeavors want their name plastered around to make sure everyone knows. Harbour City, the Hong Kong shopping mall that spent several hundred thousand Hong Kong dollars to host the duck, got around that restriction by simply having the duck anchored outside one of its entrances.
The real problem in this not-so-quiet, desperate search for a financial catalyst on the part of Kaohsiung, Keelung and others that lies behind their craving for duck is the poor state of Taiwan’s economy, and the government’s reliance on the idea that tourism can provide a quick and easy answer to anything that ails a local community.
There is also a stunning lack of creative and innovative thinking on the part of officials and bureaucrats that leads to the “me too-ism” seen in the drive to capture a duck. It is easier to copy someone else’s idea than develop one on your own. This, of course, has happened in the corporate world as well — think of all the firms that jumped into semiconductors only to create a glut — or the coffee shops that have inundated Taiwan over the past decade or how LOHAS has been hijacked by all sorts of businesses.
Hofman’s environmental message — that the world’s waterways are a global bathtub and people need to be as responsible about the planet as they are about their own homes and baths — has already been lost, sunk under the duck’s kawaii appeal. It is time to pull the plug on this mania.
For the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), China’s “century of humiliation” is the gift that keeps on giving. Beijing returns again and again to the theme of Western imperialism, oppression and exploitation to keep stoking the embers of grievance and resentment against the West, and especially the US. However, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that in 1949 announced it had “stood up” soon made clear what that would mean for Chinese and the world — and it was not an agenda that would engender pride among ordinary Chinese, or peace of mind in the international community. At home, Mao Zedong (毛澤東) launched
With a new White House document in May — the “Strategic Approach to the People’s Republic of China” — the administration of US President Donald Trump has firmly set its hyper-competitive line to tackle geoeconomic and geostrategic rivalry, followed by several reinforcing speeches by Trump and other Cabinet-level officials. By identifying China as a near-equal rival, the strategy resonates well with the bipartisan consensus on China in today’s severely divided US. In the face of China’s rapidly growing aggression, the move is long overdue, yet relevant for the maintenance of the international “status quo.” The strategy seems to herald a new
To say that this year has been eventful for China and the rest of the world would be something of an understatement. First, the US-China trade dispute, already simmering for two years, reached a boiling point as Washington tightened the noose around China’s economy. Second, China unleashed the COVID-19 pandemic on the world, wreaking havoc on an unimaginable scale and turning the People’s Republic of China into a common target of international scorn. Faced with a mounting crisis at home, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) rashly decided to ratchet up military tensions with neighboring countries in a misguided attempt to divert the
The restructuring of supply chains, particularly in the semiconductor industry, was an essential part of discussions last week between Taiwan and a US delegation led by US Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment Keith Krach. It took precedent over the highly anticipated subject of bilateral trade partnerships, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) founder Morris Chang’s (張忠謀) appearance on Friday at a dinner hosted by President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for Krach was a subtle indicator of this. Chang was in photographs posted by Tsai on Facebook after the dinner, but no details about their discussions were disclosed. With