Who is really to blame?
Has the whole story of army corporal Hung Chung-chiu’s (洪仲丘) death not been reported in the Taipei Times?
The minister of national defense resigns, an investigation continues. However, the minister of national defense had little, if anything, to do with this young man’s death. The commanding general possibly had some minor role in this untimely death.
What about the non-commissioned officer (NCO) or non-commissioned officers who meted out the punishment and the company grade officer or officers who approved it in the first place?
Place the responsibility squarely where it should be: on the shoulders of those in “first line contact.” If the commanding general is guilty of anything, it is probably negligence. However, the “first line NCOs” and company grade officer may be guilty of murder or complicity in murder. Does there need to be some revision in the military justice manual?
Probably, but first, there is a family who deserves straight and honest answers.
Green camp also ‘old boys’
Chu Ping-tzu (祝平次) pointed to institutions such as the armed forces, the police, special operatives, prosecutors and others as the “old boys” that stifled democratic reform in Taiwan (“Democratic reform is being stifled by old boys,” Aug. 6, page 8).
Chu’s concerns are valid, but the “old boys club” concept is not limited to the institutions mentioned in the article. Such mentality is, ironically, also prevalent in the green camp, among those activists of the supposedly more democratic, advanced-thinking Taiwan independence proponents, be they real or self-purported ones.
As an illustration, a woman friend of mine who is an accomplished political science academic, was told to her face by a World United For Independence (WUFI) member, that women are bad for nation-building because “women are busy looking for a husband and then busy looking after the husband.” On another occasion when she attended a conference in Taiwan, upon an inquiry as to who she was, the conference organizer, an “old boy,” answered, without hesitation: She is “just” an assistant. However, she was actually the speechwriter for the keynote speaker at that conference!
In an online discussion forum where participating members all hold doctorates or are medical doctors, that is, well-educated people, it was not uncommon to see very disparaging comments containing blatant sexism against former Democratic Progressive Party chairperson and presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) during the last election campaign. Calling her a “neighborhood girl without real capability” was one of the tamer comments.
There were also comments attacking Tsai as “not qualified because she has never married, hence she would not know how to handle complicated relationships.” She was also called “a hen in charge of the house in the morning.”
There were many more negative comments that were remarkably judgemental coming from an “educated” group of people. These educated people explicitly said that Tsai “owes” everything she is or has to former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁); their logic was, if not for Chen’s appointment of her, she would not have achieved anything by herself.
Really? Such comments illustrate not only sexism, but also feudal and anti-democratic thinking. In a democratic society, when the president appoints his or her Cabinet, the appointments are not favors distributed by the president, but an indication of ability. Moreover, the major reason Tsai became the DPP candidate was due to her impressive, nearly impossible feat of pulling the DPP together after its heart-wrenching, devastating defeat in the 2008 election — a disaster partly due to Chen’s endless family scandals.
Historically, worldwide, there have been many examples where women’s professional achievements were not appreciated or recognized appropriately, perhaps also due to the “old boys club” mentality. For example, most people remember Martha Gellhorn as “Ernest Hemingway’s third wife,” forgetting that she was a trailblazer in journalism who was one of the greatest war correspondents of the 20th century. While Watson and Crick were awarded the Nobel Prize for identifying the human DNA structure, Rosalind Franklin’s work on crystallography was critical to the identification of DNA; yet she is not a household name like those of Watson and Crick.
The famous “Tiffany Glass” designs were not by Louis Tiffany, but by a female employee, Clara Driscoll, who was the real mastermind behind them. Clara had been without proper recognition for a long time until a group of letters was uncovered decades later in which her work was described.
As indicated by history and more recently in Taiwan, there is still a long way to go to eliminate the “old boys club” mentality. This mentality is an impediment to achieving real democracy in Taiwan, both in the established institutions and the purported “green” camp.
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose
US President Donald Trump’s administration on Friday last week announced it would impose sanctions on the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, a vast paramilitary organization that is directly controlled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and has been linked to human rights violations against Uighurs and other ethnic minorities in Xinjiang. The sanctions follow US travel bans against other Xinjiang officials and the passage of the US Hong Kong Autonomy Act, which authorizes targeted sanctions against mainland Chinese and Hong Kong officials, in response to Beijing’s imposition of national security legislation on the territory. The sanctions against the corps would be implemented