According to an assessment report from the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research, the recently inked service trade agreement between Taiwan and China “will only have positive, but not very substantial effects on Taiwan’s overall economy, the trade in services, the service sector and the employment market.” The report also said that because there is still a limited amount of liberalization between Taiwan and China, especially when it comes to the extent to which Taiwan has opened up toward China, there are still many parts of the economy that Chinese investors do not have access to, unlike other foreign investors. That there is such a result after these talks have been going on for two years clearly indicates a problem. So, just what exactly is the problem?
The entire report only mentioned positive effects and did not mention even one negative effect of the agreement. President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his administration keep saying that the agreement has more positives than negatives. However, just what are these negatives? If there were no negatives, why would the government be unwilling to give China most-favored-nation status when it comes to services and even open up all parts of our service sector to China in order to increase Taiwan’s economic benefits?
The government should make the reasons clear as to why it is not willing to open up more of Taiwan’s economy to China in order to help boost its performance. In other words, the assessment report from the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research is just one aspect of an economic assessment and it is one that could even contain some errors. In addition, this assessment report is not complete, as it still needs to account for economic safety, the costs of economic transformation and the spillover effects of international negotiations.
On the whole, the service sector accounts for 70 percent of Taiwan’s GDP, while it employs 60 percent of the Taiwanese workforce. This means that it is very important to Taiwan’s economy. However, over the past decade, the service sector has only accounted for 45 percent of Taiwan’s economic growth. While manufacturing accounts for less than 30 percent of Taiwan’s GDP, it has accounted for as much as 55 percent of our economic growth. If we want to bring the Taiwanese economy back to life, a key aspect will be to come up with ways to use reforms to increase the competitiveness of Taiwan’s service sector.
Furthermore, Taiwan’s competitiveness in terms of the export of services is rapidly declining. In 2000, Taiwan was ranked 18th in the world for service exports, but by last year the ranking had dropped to 26th. Not only are China, India, Japan, Singapore, Hong Kong and South Korea way ahead of Taiwan, Thailand has also surpassed Taiwan and Macau is catching up fast. This makes it very important for Taiwan to figure out how to leverage Taiwan’s competitive advantage in the service sector.
Taiwan’s major competitor, South Korea, has already signed service trade agreements with major trading partners like the US, the EU, ASEAN and India, and the extent to which they have opened up their economies is substantial. For example, using the method used by the WTO for measuring the extent to which an economy has opened up, shows that the degree to which South Korea has opened up toward the US in terms of services has gone up from the 48.8 percent when it first gave the US most-favored-nation status to the current level of 67 percent under the bilateral trade services agreement between the US and South Korea. This is much more than the cross-strait trade service agreement has brought about.
On the other hand, Taiwan still has to discuss service trade agreements with major trading partners like the US, the EU, India and ASEAN, and Taiwanese companies are experiencing strong competition internationally from South Korean companies. Thus, leveraging the “same origin and culture” that Taiwan and China share presents Taiwan with an opportunity that is crucial to its survival. Obviously, Taiwan has already lost the chance to use the cross-strait service trade agreement to expand the reach of Taiwan’s services. Delegates from China’s Ministry of Commerce said that China was willing to open up another 10 to 20 items of their service sector to Taiwan, but Taiwan was not willing to accept this and there was nothing China could do about that.
After its signing three years ago, the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement has had very limited effects and the assessment of the effects of the cross-strait service trade agreement has also been predicted to be limited. Taiwan only enjoys tariff-free treatment on 6.9 percent of its exports, which is much lower than the 36.2 percent that South Korea enjoys.
These facts all show that Ma does not have the resolve to open up the Taiwanese economy, that he lacks an effective strategy for integrating Taiwan into the global economy, that he lacks sound strategies for cross-strait negotiations and that here in Taiwan, he lacks communication channels and policies. The Ma government should review their policies for economic liberalization as soon as possible so as to avoid Taiwan’s economy from becoming further marginalized.
Tung Chen-yuan is a professor in National Chengchi University’s Graduate Institute of Development Studies.
Translated by Drew Cameron
I came to Taiwan to pursue my degree thinking that Taiwanese are “friendly,” but I was welcomed by Taiwanese classmates laughing at my friend’s name, Maria (瑪莉亞). At the time, I could not understand why they were mocking the name of Jesus’ mother. Later, I learned that “Maria” had become a stereotype — a shorthand for Filipino migrant workers. That was because many Filipino women in Taiwan, especially those who became house helpers, happen to have that name. With the rapidly increasing number of foreigners coming to Taiwan to work or study, more Taiwanese are interacting, socializing and forming relationships with
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
Earlier signs suggest that US President Donald Trump’s policy on Taiwan is set to move in a more resolute direction, as his administration begins to take a tougher approach toward America’s main challenger at the global level, China. Despite its deepening economic woes, China continues to flex its muscles, including conducting provocative military drills off Taiwan, Australia and Vietnam recently. A recent Trump-signed memorandum on America’s investment policy was more about the China threat than about anything else. Singling out the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as a foreign adversary directing investments in American companies to obtain cutting-edge technologies, it said
The recent termination of Tibetan-language broadcasts by Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) is a significant setback for Tibetans both in Tibet and across the global diaspora. The broadcasts have long served as a vital lifeline, providing uncensored news, cultural preservation and a sense of connection for a community often isolated by geopolitical realities. For Tibetans living under Chinese rule, access to independent information is severely restricted. The Chinese government tightly controls media and censors content that challenges its narrative. VOA and RFA broadcasts have been among the few sources of uncensored news available to Tibetans, offering insights
RSS