If President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) motto of “integrity is my life” — which he has publicly repeated numerous times — were to be taken literally, he would currently be on life support.
This year’s Global Corruption Barometer report, conducted by Transparency International, dealt a debilitating blow to Ma and his administration, with 36 percent of Taiwanese respondents reported as paying a bribe to someone in a government agency in the past 12 months.
More than half, or 56 percent, felt that public officials, civil servants and police were corrupt. Also branded corrupt was the judiciary by 57 percent of respondents, the legislature by 75 percent, and political parties by 74 percent.
While the Ma administration had suspicions about the validity of the survey and argued that the results were different from similar polls conducted by the Taiwanese government, it is no surprise that people say the results more or less reflect their real-life experience.
In the past two years, numerous officials in the Ma administration and politicians of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), of which Ma serves as chairman, have been either indicted or accused of corruption. Among them are former Executive Yuan secretary-general Lin Yi-shih (林益世), former Taipei City councilor Lai Su-ju (賴素如), former National Fire Agency director-general Huang Chi-min (黃季敏) and several officials at River Management Offices and the Taiwan Railways Administration across the country.
Just this past week, Control Yuan Secretary-General Chen Feng-yi (陳豐義) was charged with illegally destroying documents reportedly related to the KMT’s ill-gotten party assets, an issue that Ma pledged to deal with, but never did. In an interview with Next TV on Wednesday, Ma evaded the party assets issue each time he was pressed about it.
The president has also turned a blind eye to concerns raised by lawmakers across party lines that officials of Taiwan Power Co and CPC Corp, Taiwan, could be involved in corruption. This is why these state-owned companies must be reformed first before electricity and fuel prices are increased — one of Ma’s proud policies displaying questionable vision.
The implications behind the survey results and the incidents are alarming, but not without explanation.
First, this administration has gotten used to making promises it thinks are okay not to deliver. Sadly, it appears Taiwanese have also gotten used to the cheating, even if they find it unacceptable.
Second, misconduct and malfunction are rife in Ma’s government, with the Agency Against Corruption, established under Ma’s leadership, the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office Special Investigation Division and the Control Yuan all failing to do anything about it.
Third, the power of media is so strong that Ma’s “Mr Clean” image sticks in people’s mind and the KMT has succeeded in making people believe it is the party of integrity or, at least, less corrupt than the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
However, Ma and his party need to understand that repeatedly flogging the dead horse of the DPP does not justify the KMT’s widespread and persistent corruption on both local and central government level. First they must deal with the ill-gotten assets and prove that they are an administration as clean as Ma promises.
Before those things happen, Ma should be very careful about voicing his motto “integrity is my life” when those who work under him do not seem to care for Ma’s life.
The full extent of his integrity, and that of the KMT, will no doubt only be uncovered after Ma leaves office in 2016.
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
We are witnessing a sea change in the government’s approach to China, from one of reasonable, low-key reluctance at rocking the boat to a collapse of pretense over and patience in Beijing’s willful intransigence. Finally, we are seeing a more common sense approach in the face of active shows of hostility from a foreign power. According to Article 2 of the 2020 Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法), a “foreign hostile force” is defined as “countries, political entities or groups that are at war with or are engaged in a military standoff with the Republic of China [ROC]. The same stipulation applies to
RSS