Chinese tourists: clean up
It is past time the Chinese became concerned about the manners of their touring public. While at Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport last year, my wife and I were waiting in line for our flight when a group of Chinese tourists pushed their way to the front of the line.
They proceeded to eat their breakfast of hard-boiled eggs and dough sticks. They all deposited the eggshells on the floor along with the doughsticks’ wrappers.
A month later we were on a Ubus going to Taipei when a Chinese tourist evidently decided he did not need to use the rather small bus bathroom: He urinated in the aisle of the bus. When confronted by other passengers he proceeded to curse everyone within earshot and referred to Taiwanese as “servants to China.”
This all brings to mind the pre-Olympics guidance issued by the Chinese government: “Please do not spit, burp, pass gas or urinate in public places during the Olympics.”
Did it do much to deter such behavior? Obviously not. A recent sad case in point is the young man from Nanjing who defaced a 3,500-year-old temple in Luxor.
A bit of advice to Chinese tourists: Clean up your act or stay at home. We do not need your money that badly.
Tom Kuleck
Greater Taichung
No oxymoron in overlapping
I would like to take issue with Martin Phipps (Letters, May 31, page 8). Phipps was right in saying that “overlapping” and “exclusive” are opposite in meaning, so we cannot say “overlapping exclusive zones.”
Wikipedia rightly says that an exclusive economic zone (EEZ) stretches from the baseline out to 200 nautical miles (370km) from a nation’s coast. Here “exclusive” means it belongs to someone and no one else. However, since many countries, especially island countries, are adjacent to one another, EEZs are bound to be overlapping, triggering disputes or even conflicts between or among these countries. If Phipps continues to read the Wikipedia page in question, he will see a list of such disputes. This list is by no means exhaustive.
Since Taiwan and the Philippines are less than 200 nautical miles apart, their EEZs are bound to overlap. Taiwanese fishermen have every right to fish in Taiwan’s EEZ, which overlaps with that of the Philippines. Taiwan has been generous enough to self-impose boundary lines to avoid conflicts with the Philippines. The Philippines should not take this as a signal that Taiwan’s EEZ stops at these lines.
I think it is easy to see that countries that have “overlapping exclusive zones” should negotiate agreements to clearly set their “exclusive” zone to avoid confrontations. It is clear that Taiwan and the Philippines need to negotiate as soon as possible.
I do not think Phipps understands the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea correctly. However, I do agree with him when he says, “I don’t approve of the way they [the Philippine Coast Guard] responded.”
Shane Lee
Greater Tainan
Web bans different to China
I want to take the opportunity to say how outraged I am by the recent spat of ridiculous articles that compare Taiwan’s proposed legislation to restrict access to Web sites that are maintained for the purpose of copyright infringement to China’s Great Firewall.
Three incendiary and asinine articles put forward the idea that Taiwan was or is attempting to become more like China by enacting Internet restrictions. That is complete nonsense. Why would these reporters compare Taiwan to China? That is simple stupidity and racism to boot.
China operates a firewall with no respect to copyright. They do it to oppress and control the public by depriving them of news service sites and social media sites which could provide information about the government’s policies and lies. Taiwan has in no way mentioned blocking news services.
The UK and Australia both have site-blocking restrictions in place for sites that are designed to incite and instruct terrorism, peddle child pornography and flaunt copyright laws. Why did these lazy reporters not say Taiwan is becoming more like the UK or Australia?
I understand journalists may include opposition parties view that Taiwan’s law could creep into other aspects of people’s lives. However to argue that the slippery slope is a given is to give credence to the tinfoil-hatted, conspiracy theory-loving anarchists who believe the government is always out to get us.
I oppose the proposed legislation. I do not support censoring the Internet, but I have had enough of lazy, amateur journalists who rely on outrageous headlines and demagoguery to boost their sales or “hits.” They have no right to muddy political discourse.
Aaron Andrews
Greater Taichung
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS