As a former US diplomat with a keen interest in Taiwan and its future, I am concerned about the present row between Taipei and Manila over the sad and unfortunate death of Taiwanese fisherman Hung Shih-cheng (洪石成) after an encounter between a Taiwanese fishing boat and the Philippine Coast Guard on May 9.
Emotions are running high and angry accusations are being leveled in both directions. This is unfortunate and could have been avoided if everyone had maintained a cool head and proceeded in a reasonable and rational manner.
First and foremost, it is important that a clear and objective assessment of what actually happened be established. The Philippines is taking a lead in that, but Taiwan can help by not jumping to conclusions or making fiery accusations. Terms like “cold-blooded murder” — found on the front page of the Web site of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs — are seen as premature by the international community (certainly before an investigation) and unhelpful.
To come to a mutually agreeable settlement, the Philippines must go out of its way to establish the truth, but Taiwan must go the extra mile not to be confrontational. In diplomacy it is always better if both sides participate in a give-and-take. Hard and fast ultimatums do not help and are counterproductive.
Instead, the two sides need to reduce the tension and tone down the rhetoric. As the US Department of State recently said: Washington is concerned by the increase in tensions between two neighboring democracies and close partners of the US in the Asia-Pacific region, and urges the two countries to take all appropriate measures to clarify disagreements and prevent the recurrence of tragic events. The State Department also urged both parties to refrain from actions that could further escalate tensions in the region and undermine the prospects for a rapid and effective resolution of differences.
However, there is another aspect that worries me: the role of China. One of the reasons why the Filipinos are edgy about their territorial waters is that China has been aggressively encroaching into areas that have traditionally been under control of the Philippines, such as the Scarborough Shoal (Huangyan Island, 黃岩島).
The incident thus plays into China’s hands. Right after the altercation, Xinhua news agency reported that China’s Taiwan Affairs Office was condemning the event as a “barbaric act.”
Quoting a Chinese academic, the Chinese Communist Party mouthpiece Beijing Times said: “China has reiterated over time that Taiwan is an integral part of China. Now is a good opportunity to show that China will not tolerate the shooting of our fishermen, whether they are from the mainland or Taiwan, and that our government is determined to protect the life of its people.”
Taiwan must make clear that it is rejecting such united front tactics and that it is not aligning itself with China in an attempt to push Manila into a corner.
Taiwan and the Philippines are both democracies. This means that both have to be sensitive to the voices of the people, but it also means that there must be leadership and vision, and decisions and actions should not be guided by angry emotions or vitriolic nationalism.
A way out is possible if both sides agree to examine the evidence in a rational and objective fashion. The Philippines needs to be forthcoming with all information pertaining to the chain of events that led to the shooting and Taiwan needs to display patience and calm. It needs to avoid inflammatory language that increases tensions -— cooler heads must prevail.
Nat Bellocchi is a former chairman of the American Institute in Taiwan and a special adviser to the Liberty Times Group. The views expressed in this article are his own.
In the closing weeks of 2000, an army of Singaporean government officials descended on Washington to make good on a handshake between then-US President Bill Clinton and Singaporean Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong (吳作棟). They had agreed to strike an FTA after a round of golf in Brunei that past November. Running a small city-state, Singapore’s leaders and their diplomats live with their ear to the ground, attuned to the slightest geopolitical movements. They were motivated then by a big-picture strategic concern — keeping the US embedded in their region. An FTA they thought would help do that. It worked. Clinton’s successor,
On Oct. 6, the UN Committee on Human Rights released a statement on the concentration camps in China’s Xinjiang region in which at least 1 million Uighurs and other ethnic minorities are incarcerated. On the same day, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) was telling delegates at a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) meeting that “happiness among the people in Xinjiang is on the rise.” It was a stark reminder of the CCP’s longstanding practice of trampling on human rights and deceiving the world. In October last year, the Taiwan East Turkestan Association and the Taiwan Friends of Tibet held an event titled
In a Facebook post on Wednesday last week, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Taipei City Councilor Hsu Chiao-hsin (徐巧芯) wrote: “The KMT must fall for Taiwan to improve.’ Allow me to ask the question again: Is this really true?” It matters not how many times Hsu asks the question, my answer will always be the same: “Yes, the KMT must be toppled for Taiwan to improve.” In the lengthy Facebook post, titled “What were those born in the 1980s guilty of?” Hsu harked back to the idealistic aspirations of the 2014 Sunflower movement before heaping opprobrium on the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP)
Some people are saying the weather has been wonderful this year. That depends on how one defines wonderful weather. The Ministry of Economic Affairs last week announced that the alert level for Taoyuan, Hsinchu, Miaoli and Taichung areas are to be raised from green to yellow, and that water pressure is to be reduced at night. Few households with water tower storage facilities would have noticed any restrictions on their supply, but people concerned with the water situation have been aware for some time that the lack of typhoons this year, coupled with low rainfall, has meant that in the