Ongoing tensions with Japan, Vietnam and the Philippines over islands in the South and East China seas has not prevented an increasingly assertive China from opening yet another front by staging a military incursion across the disputed, forbidding Himalayan frontier.
On the night of April 15, a Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) platoon stealthily intruded near the China-India-Pakistan tri-junction, established a camp 19km inside Indian-controlled territory and presented India’s government with the potential loss of a strategically vital 750km2 high-altitude plateau.
A stunned India, already reeling under a crippling domestic political crisis, groped for an effective response to China’s land grab — the largest and most strategic real estate China has seized since it began pursuing a more muscular policy toward its neighbors. Prior to Sunday’s withdrawal agreement, whether China originally intended to stay put by building permanent structures for its troops on the plateau’s icy heights, or always planned to withdraw, remains an open — and in some ways a moot — question.
With its “peaceful rise” giving way to an increasingly sharp-elbowed approach to its neighbors, China has broadened its “core interests” — which brook no compromise — and territorial claims, while showing a growing readiness to take risks to achieve its goals. For example, China has not only escalated its challenge to Japan’s decades-old control of the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台) — known in Japan as the Senkaku Islands — but is also facing off against the Philippines since taking effective control of the Scarborough Shoal (Huangyan Island, 黃岩島) last year. Both of these territories are also claimed by Taiwan.
What makes the Himalayan incursion a powerful symbol of China’s aggressive new stance in Asia is that its intruding troops set up camp in an area that extends beyond the “line of actual control” (LAC) that China unilaterally drew when it defeated India in the 1962 Chinese-initiated Sino-Indian War.
While China’s navy and a part of its air force focus on supporting revanchist territorial and maritime claims in the South and East China seas, its army has been active in the mountainous borderlands with India, trying to alter the LAC piece by piece.
One of the novel methods that the PLA has employed is to bring ethnic Han pastoralists to the valleys along the LAC and give them cover to roam across it, in the process driving Indian herdsmen from their traditional pastureland.
However, the latest crisis was sparked by China’s use of direct military means in a strategic border area close to the Karakoram Pass linking China to India.
Because the LAC has not been mutually clarified — China reneged on a 2001 promise to exchange maps with India — Beijing claims that PLA troops were just camping on “Chinese land.”
Yet, in a replay of its old strategy of furtively encroaching on disputed land and then presenting itself as the conciliator, China then counseled “patience” and “negotiations” to help resolve the issue.
China was clearly seeking to exploit India’s political disarray to alter the reality on the ground. A paralyzed and rudderless Indian government initially blacked out reporting on the incursion, lest it come under public pressure to mount a robust response. Its first public statement came only after China issued a bland denial of the intrusion in response to Indian media reports quoting army sources.
To add to India’s woes, Indian Minister of Foreign Affairs Salman Khurshid initially made light of the deepest Chinese incursion in more than a quarter of a century. The garrulous minister called the intrusion just “one little spot” of acne on the otherwise “beautiful face” of the bilateral relationship — a mere blemish that could be treated with “an ointment.” Those inept comments fatally undercut the Indian government’s summoning of the Chinese ambassador to demand a return to the “status quo ante.”
With Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s corruption-tainted government tottering on the brink of collapse, there has been no official explanation of how India was caught napping in a militarily critical area where China has made repeated attempts to encroach on Indian land in the recent past.
The Indian government inexplicably replaced regular army troops with border police in 2010 to patrol the mountain-ringed plateau into which the PLA intruded. Known as Depsang, the plateau lies astride an ancient silk route connecting Yarkand in China’s Xinjiang region to India’s Ladakh region through the Karakoram Pass.
India, with a military staging post and airstrip just south of the Karakoram Pass, has the capacity to cut off the highway linking China with its “all-weather ally,” Pakistan. The PLA intrusion, by threatening that Indian base, may have been intended to foreclose India’s ability to choke off supplies to Chinese troops and workers in Pakistan’s Gilgit-Baltistan region, where China has expanded its military footprint and strategic projects. To guard those projects, several thousand Chinese troops have reportedly been deployed in the rebellious, predominantly Shiite region, which is closed to the outside world.
For India, the Chinese incursion also threatened its access to the 6,300m high Siachen Glacier, to the west of Depsang. Pakistan claims the Indian-controlled glacier, which, wedged strategically between the Pakistani and Chinese-held parts of Kashmir, served as the world’s highest and coldest battleground — and one of the bloodiest — from the mid-1980s until a ceasefire took effect in 2003.
For the time being, the Himalayan crisis seems to be over and Chinese and Indian troops began moving out of the region on Tuesday. However, before it can exercise any long-term presence in the area credibly, India needs a stable government. Until then, China will continue to press its claims by whatever means — fair or foul — it deems advantageous.
Brahma Chellaney is a professor of Strategic Studies at the New Delhi-based Center for Policy Research.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
RSS