The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) recently released the main text and statement of reasons for its proposed referendum on the continued construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in Gongliao District (貢寮), New Taipei City (新北市), in an attempt to force the decision to hold a referendum through the legislature.
The problem is that the Referendum Act (公民投票法) stipulates that more than half of all eligible voters, 9.13 million people, must vote for a referendum to be valid. No referendum has been passed in Taiwan, and even the two referendums on the name Taiwan should use to seek UN membership, held conjointly with the 2008 presidential election, failed because less than half of all eligible voters voted.
For the same reason, a nuclear referendum held under the regulations of the Referendum Act will never pass, regardless of how the referendum question is phrased. Not only will this bring us back to square one, it will also provide a public opinion basis for the plant’s continued construction.
The KMT first argued that the nuclear power plant was safe, and after it failed to gain the public’s trust, it decided to manipulate public opinion through a referendum in an attempt to justify its plans for continued construction. Under the KMT’s manipulation, the issue of the plant has taken a backseat to political wrangling and people’s safety has been sacrificed. The Fourth Nuclear Power Plant is not a zero-sum game, nor is it about political plotting.
Last year, environmental protection groups initiated a draft amendment to the Nuclear Reactor Facilities Control Act (核子反應器設施管制法) in the legislature that would add an article, Article 6-1, to the act. According to the proposed amendment, a mandatory, local referendum bypassing the Referendum Act should be held in the areas within a 50km radius of the plant before a nuclear reactor is built, nuclear rods are installed or a plant becomes operational.
Such an “evacuation zone clause” would be the best way to get back to the most fundamental issues surrounding the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant. Given that the right to life supersedes economic rights and everything else, residents within a 50km radius of the nuclear power plant have the right to have a say on the issue.
Therefore, residents of Taipei, New Taipei City, Keelung and Yilan County — the four areas that would be directly affected if a nuclear disaster occurred — should be allowed to vote in a referendum that requires only a simple majority to pass. This draft has already been submitted to the legislature for review and was approved to go to a second reading. This would not only resolve the deadlock between the ruling and the opposition parties over the referendum issue, but would waste fewer social resources.
After all of the problems and dangers surrounding the planning and construction of the plant, Taiwanese are worried that the plant will bring terrible disaster if construction is not halted. Therefore, we cannot allow the unreasonable Referendum Act to take away the public’s right to choose when it comes to the plant and sacrifice the right to life of the residents of Taipei, New Taipei City, Keelung and Yilan County.
The “evacuation zone clause” will not only be capable of ending all the troubles caused by debate on the Referendum Act while refocusing society back on the crux of the problem — the construction of the plant — it can also test whether the KMT, Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) and lawmakers truly care about the issues surrounding the plant or whether they are just using them for political purposes.
Huang Kun-huei is the chairman of the Taiwan Solidarity Union.
Translated by Drew Cameron
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS