It is encouraging that people from all walks of life on Saturday participated in the biggest anti-nuclear rally in the nation’s history, in the latest attempt to push the government to abolish nuclear power after the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant disaster in Japan two years ago.
Protesters called on the government to suspend the last phase of construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in Gongliao District (貢寮), New Taipei City (新北市), and to phase out the nation’s three operational nuclear plants as soon as possible.
It is clear that the public wants a clean and sustainable source of energy, so nuclear power is not an option. The government should cater to the public’s wants, rather than continue to make empty promises.
Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) said yesterday that Taiwan Power Co will prioritize safety when building and operating nuclear power plants. Jiang added that the government will not approve the NT$11.7 billion (US$394 million) in extra funds needed to continue the plant’s construction if it does not pass a safety inspection and that a national referendum later this year would determine if the project should be suspended.
These measures are insufficient and it is irresponsible of the government to carry on billing nuclear power as the nation’s sole source of energy because it is relatively low-cost and produces almost zero carbon dioxide emissions, while excluding alternative sources of energy. The government should devise a clear and comprehensive energy policy to provide a stable supply of power, encourage the use and development of alternative energy sources, and boost efficiency at coal and natural gas power plants. Responsible energy use is also essential to reduce reliance on nuclear power.
“Green” energy is not out of reach for Taiwan — LED and solar technology offer viable, important solutions. Based on market researcher TrendForce Corp’s calculations, the nation could reduce energy consumption by 2.56 percent if the LED usage rate rose to 20 percent. If the usage reached 100 percent, the power saved would be equal to the rated capacity of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant.
This calculation is based on lighting devices comprising about 18 percent of the nation’s overall power consumption.
Taiwan may not be able to install an extensive system of solar panels like Germany and Spain, because of the typhoons that hit the country. However, solar panels or solar farms could be set up in Greater Kaohsiung and Pingtung and Taitung counties, because those areas have extended periods of peak sunlight. Solar energy could significantly supplement the nation’s power supply.
The government is failing to promote solar cell installation. Up to now, solar panels generating a total of only 10 megawatts have been installed, meaning less than 1 percent of the power generated in Taiwan comes from the sun.
The government should also boost efficiency at gas-fueled power plants, or try new methods of energy production. It should shift to the US to obtain its natural gas, because it is less expensive than buying it from Indonesia, which is currently Taiwan’s primary natural gas supplier.
There are many ways in which the nation could save energy and generate power at lower cost and in a safer way than nuclear power.
The government is responsible for exploring all the options for generating electricity and reducing the nation’s reliance on nuclear power, and the first is to devise an energy policy that reflects the public’s concerns. However, there is no sign that the government intends to change its existing policy of seeing nuclear power as the solution to the nation’s energy needs.
The planned referendum is placing the public on the front line of the fight for clean and safe energy. Holding this referendum is a way for the government to shake off its responsibility to provide stable power to the nation under the guise of democratic participation.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
RSS