Squabbling in Washington over the debt ceiling is again raising the specter that the US may be forced to delay payments on its debt. While the stigma of a default would be damaging enough to investor sentiment, the chaos from a breakdown in financial markets’ systems that might result would be even scarier.
A failure to make payments on US Treasuries, however brief, would create widespread damage in short-term funding markets, which are crucial to daily operations of financial institutions, investment firms and many corporations, analysts and investors say.
In the event of a default, confusion would be rampant as trading systems struggle to identify, transfer and settle bonds that have matured, but have not been repaid. Interest rates would surge and investors would likely sell stocks and commodities as they fled risky assets, analysts say.
However, that does not mean investors would necessarily run to the safety of Treasuries. Many US government bonds could be shunned as investors worry about which issues are in default — even longer-dated issues that could have a coupon payment due that would potentially be in jeopardy.
A default could also trigger a wider paralysis in the financial system that could quite quickly stall the economy, as happened at the height of the financial crisis in September 2008.
For starters, money market funds are not allowed to hold defaulted collateral. These funds pulled back on making loans in 2011, when the ceiling was last an issue, and some analysts fear this time could be worse, potentially creating broad funding problems and sending the cost of borrowing in short-term markets — including those in repurchase agreements or loans based on the London Interbank Offered Rate, or Libor — surging.
The US Treasury hit its US$16.4 trillion debt ceiling — the legal amount it is allowed to borrow — on New Year’s Eve. The US Department of the Treasury will run short of funds as early as the middle of next month, so legislation is needed to increase the borrowing limit. This had been a formality for years but turned into a political standoff between congressional Republicans and the White House over government spending levels in the summer of 2011. The resulting battle roiled markets concerned about US political gridlock and its impact on the economy.
The likelihood of a default on US Treasuries has in the past been seen as so low that many parts of the market fail to even account for it in planning and paperwork. For example, unlike other debt, such as corporate bonds, Treasuries documentation has no grace period to make up for missed interest or principal payments.
Many banks and investors may not even have the systems needed to screen out which Treasuries have principal or interest payments due that are most at risk of not being paid.
“No one is going to build a system to assume you have a defaulted Treasury floating around there; it’s not a baseline assumption,” said Michael Cloherty, head of US interest rate strategy at RBC Capital Markets in New York.
Treasury bills maturing at the end of next month and in March are most vulnerable to default, though analysts say hundreds of other issues also have coupon payments due at the end of next month. Rates on some short-term debt maturing in that time have risen and now yield more than similar debt maturing in April, a sign that a dislocation has started.
The chain reaction from a potential default suggests a slow spread of damage through various parts of the banking system, particularly the US$5 trillion repurchase agreement market, which many companies rely on for funds.
The Treasury Market Practices Group, a group of market participants, has been looking into operational challenges of a US default since the 2011 fight. It noted that other major events such as a terrorist attack, a failure of trading or other operational systems, or a natural disaster could also delay a debt payment.
One potential problem is that the New York Fed’s Fedwire Securities Service, which is used to hold, transfer and settle Treasuries, would need some manual daily adjustments, as it otherwise cannot transfer bonds that are past their maturity date, the group said in meeting minutes from last year. Other systems may have similar problems, it said.
Treasuries are widely used to back loans in the repo, or repurchase agreement, market, and in privately traded derivatives and for a host of securities traded on exchanges. Ownership and possession of the bonds is transferred regularly as part of this collateralization process.
However, put sand in the gears of the transfers, and anarchy may ensue.
After the September 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, market participants struggled to identify who their counterparties were in the repo market, and even had difficulty grasping whether their net Treasuries position was a long or short one, after trading records were destroyed.
The number of trade “fails,” when the borrower does not supply Treasuries to settle a loan, surged in the weeks after the attacks, initially rising because of operational problems and then staying high as the cost of obtaining Treasuries to settle a loan was as expensive as the cost of allowing a fail.
To resolve the issue, the Treasury held a special auction of 10-year notes to increase supply and help settle the loans.
The US has defaulted once before, in 1979, when lawmakers were blamed in part for allowing negotiations to go down to the wire before raising the debt ceiling.
After that, back-office errors at the Treasury, caused the government to be late in redeeming three series of Treasuries bills, according to an academic paper by Terry Zivney and Richard Marcus published in the Financial Review in 1989. The failure caused rates to rise, and the government faced lawsuits from investors hurt by the delays in repaying the bonds, they said.
Markets now are far more complicated. Battles over ownership, interest paid or owed and a host of other issues relating to the transfer of the securities would likely be mired in legal disputes. US debt is also considerably higher, and there is greater foreign ownership of Treasuries. The economy is also more vulnerable, making the risk of a creditor exodus a far more damaging prospect for the country.
“The minute we default, there would be a complete collapse in the bond market,” said Peter Schiff, chief executive officer of Euro Pacific Capital and a critic of US government spending habits.
That would leave the US struggling to refinance more than US$4.6 trillion that come due within two years, including US$3 trillion of Treasuries due to mature this year.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS