It is time to reassess whether public sector workers are becoming an intolerable burden on the national coffers amid growing public dissatisfaction about their lavish pay. The government can only hope to recoup some of this expense through new taxes, as the current tax base is eroding during the economic downturn. To sort out the problem, innovative thinking is needed to prevent new policies from weakening an already fragile economy. The implementation of austerity measures can often be a double-edged sword.
The government also has to take into consideration that the payroll of those working in the public sector includes numerous benefits and a retirement package, which accounted for 66 percent of the its overall budget in 2011.
The latest in a slew of nonstop calls to reduce the drainage on public funds is to scrap the practice of issuing credit cards that are tailored-made for the nation’s 480,000 public sector workers, including public school teachers and government agency staff.
The special credit card, first issued in 2003, was originally aimed at boosting the nation’s tourism sector and encouraging government employees to take holidays instead of receiving pay for untaken leave.
This policy is seen as a travel subsidy program and costs the government about NT$7 billion (US$242 million) a year because employees are given an allowance of NT$16,000 per person per year, through using the credit card at designated stores nationwide.
The program did help to boost domestic consumption and spending, especially at hotels and restaurants, in the first few years of its implementation and the impact was particularly marked during the SARS epidemic in 2003, when the tourism sector went through a rough time.
However, the effect on the tourism sector has gradually diminished, with statistics from the Council of Economic Planning and Development showing that only 40 percent of the NT$40 billion spent on domestic tourism was attributed to the credit card last year.
Despite this, the council said that the NT$7 billion program has stimulated domestic demand and boosted private consumption which, in turn, has helped the economy grow. The program has also saved the government NT$14 billion in payments that would have been made for untaken leave, the council added.
The program may well help drive Taiwan’s GDP growth, as private consumption has evolved into a major factor influencing Taiwan’s GDP and is becoming more important in supporting economic growth as overseas demand dwindles.
However, the program has been in place for a decade and adjustments both in policy and scale are needed. First, it should be disconnected from development in the tourism sector, which is now significantly supported by Chinese tourists rather than local travelers.
The government should also stop paying public sector staff for untaken annual leave and consider using their budget to give a travel subsidy instead. This is a policy commonly used in the private sector in Taiwan –– public sector employees should not enjoy preferential treatment.
In addition, NT$16,000 a year for travel is substantial compared with other travel subsidies offered, usually about NT$3,000. The government should reduce the amount to a more reasonable one.
This is probably just wishful thinking and an over-simplification of the issue, given the complicated government police-making process, involving interwoven political interests. However, to reduce public anger, the government needs to work out new plans that make fair use of public funds. After all, hardworking taxpayers need to know their money is being spent on the right things.
In a meeting with Haitian Minister of Foreign Affairs Jean-Victor Harvel Jean-Baptiste on Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) vowed to continue providing aid to Haiti. Taiwan supports Haiti with development in areas such as agriculture, healthcare and education through initiatives run by the Taiwan International Cooperation and Development Fund (ICDF). The nation it has established itself as a responsible, peaceful and innovative actor committed to global cooperation, Jean-Baptiste said. Testimonies such as this give Taiwan a voice in the global community, where it often goes unheard. Taiwan’s reception in Haiti also contrasts with how China has been perceived in countries in the region
The world has become less predictable, less rules-based, and more shaped by the impulses of strongmen and short-term dealmaking. Nowhere is this more consequential than in East Asia, where the fate of democratic Taiwan hinges on how global powers manage — or mismanage — tensions with an increasingly assertive China. The return of Donald Trump to the White House has deepened the global uncertainty, with his erratic, highly personalized foreign-policy approach unsettling allies and adversaries alike. Trump appears to treat foreign policy like a reality show. Yet, paradoxically, the global unpredictability may offer Taiwan unexpected deterrence. For China, the risk of provoking the
On April 13, I stood in Nanan (南安), a Bunun village in southern Hualien County’s Jhuosi Township (卓溪), absorbing lessons from elders who spoke of the forest not as backdrop, but as living presence — relational, sacred and full of spirit. I was there with fellow international students from National Dong Hwa University (NDHU) participating in a field trip that would become one of the most powerful educational experiences of my life. Ten days later, a news report in the Taipei Times shattered the spell: “Formosan black bear shot and euthanized in Hualien” (April 23, page 2). A tagged bear, previously released
Young supporters of former Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) were detained for posting the names and photographs of judges and prosecutors believed to be overseeing the Core Pacific City redevelopment corruption case. The supporters should be held responsible for their actions. As for Ko’s successor, TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), he should reflect on whether his own comments are provocative and whether his statements might be misunderstood. Huang needs to apologize to the public and the judiciary. In the article, “Why does sorry seem to be the hardest word?” the late political commentator Nan Fang Shuo (南方朔) wrote