In recent times a lot of controversy over environmental impact assessments, such as the ones concerning the Miramar Resort and the fourth-phase expansion of the Central Taiwan Science Park, have become a focus of civic groups, with large numbers of people getting involved.
The same is true of other controversies with environmental implications, such as the campaign to preserve the Losheng Sanatorium and opposition to the proposed construction of a freeway between Suao (蘇澳) and Hualien. These issues often point to a single clash of values.
The question is, between economic growth on the one hand and the environment and culture on the other, which should get top priority? Perhaps the question should be what is economic growth really for?
Taiwan is a country where economic language crops up all over the place. President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) even talked about the economy during the celebration of the 350th anniversary of a Taoist temple.
In his speech, he predicted that the nation’s economic growth this year would be higher than last year. He also said that the stronger the religious atmosphere in a country, the more helpful it would be for economic growth.
While watching a hot-air balloon take off during the chilly New Year’s Day flag-raising ceremony, Ma was moved to say that he was full of optimism for Taiwan’s economic prospects, and that he hoped that Taiwan’s happiness index and economic growth would soar up high just like the hot-air balloon.
In economics, a country’s growth rate is often expressed in terms of changes in the GDP or gross national product (GNP). That is part of the ABC of economics, but is economics no more than a game of imperceptible numbers? Are things like the environment, culture, labor conditions, employment and education merely cost factors that stand in the way of growth?
Former US attorney general Robert Kennedy’s remarks in a speech given not long before he was assassinated show that he clearly understood the limited significance of measures such as GDP and GNP.
“Our gross national product ... if we should judge the US by that — that gross national product counts air pollution and cigarette advertising, and ambulances to clear our highways of carnage. It counts special locks for our doors and the jails for those who break them. It counts the destruction of our redwoods and the loss of our natural wonder in chaotic sprawl. It counts napalm and counts nuclear warheads, and armored cars for police who fight the riots in our cities ... Yet the GDP does not allow for the health of our children, the quality of their education, or the joy of their play. It does not include the beauty of our poetry or the strength of our marriages; the intelligence of our public debate or the integrity of our public officials … it measures everything, in short, except that which makes life worthwhile,” Kennedy said
Even Simon Kuznets, who pioneered the measurement of GNP and was awarded the Nobel Prize in Economics in 1971, repeatedly cautioned people not to read too much into the numbers.
“The welfare of a nation can scarcely be inferred from a measurement of national income” and “Distinctions must be kept in mind between quantity and quality of growth,” he said.
Even if Taiwanese keep on talking about economic growth at every possible opportunity, please let the nation learn how to achieve the kind of growth that allows everyone to really feel the benefits. That will permit society to develop in a sustainable way.
Lin Chia-ho is an assistant professor at National Chengchi University’s College of Law.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Burger King Taiwan on Wednesday last week posted an update on Facebook advertising a new “Wuhan pneumonia” (武漢肺炎) home delivery meal, catering to customers hankering for a Whopper, but who wished to avoid visiting one of its outlets. “Wuhan pneumonia” is the term commonly used in Taiwan to describe COVID-19. Beijing has been waging an extensive propaganda campaign against the use of the words “Wuhan” or “China” in reference to the novel coronavirus, calling it racist and discriminatory. Meanwhile, Chinese officials have claimed that the coronavirus might have originated in the US. The intention is obvious: to distract attention from the Chinese Communist
Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Air Force Shaanxi KJ-500 airborne early-warning aircraft and Shenyang J-11 fighters on March 16 conducted a nighttime exercise in the waters southwest of Taiwan and, in doing so, came close to the nation’s air defense identification zone. Three days later, the PLA Navy’s fleet for Gulf of Aden escort mission sailed north in the Pacific off Taiwan’s east coast via the Miyako Strait on its way home. Meanwhile, the US carried out freedom of navigation operations in the South China Sea and assembled the USS Theodore Roosevelt carrier strike group with the Expeditionary Strike Group to conduct
Italy, Spain, France, the UK and the US are all depending on social distancing to fight COVID-19 and have fallen into terrible situations, with mounting positive cases and many deaths. Social distancing might flatten the curve, so that the peak is not so high that hospitals are overwhelmed with patients, the problem is that the pandemic could extend further into the future, hurt the economy more and become unbearable for society. Taiwan, South Korea, Japan and Singapore have controlled the spread of COVID-19, and the main reason is that most Asians wear masks. It can be illustrated as follows: If someone contracts the
Having returned to the UK late last year and with a Taiwanese spouse remaining in Taiwan, I have been afforded the chance to compare and contrast the UK and Taiwanese governments’ responses to the COVID-19 crisis. My early conclusions are that Taiwan benefits from a rational, competent government, which quickly recognizes, adapts to and confronts large-scale disasters. It is led by a government that does more than just talk of respecting democracy and human rights, one that is scrutinized and responds to criticism, one that is concerned about public opinion, and one that is used to dealing with emergencies on