There is a serious imbalance in the graduate jobs market in Taiwan. Many highly qualified graduates are finding there are not enough jobs to go around, while there is a shortage of graduates available for research and development (R&D) positions in local industries, a problem exacerbated by too little investment in those industries. The nation needs to find a win-win solution.
Take the biotechnology talent surplus, for example. The government has proposed a three-year employment plan providing a subsidised one-year training program to 100 unemployed biotech PhDs. However, such short-term subsidies only extend the time graduates are out of work and are not a good solution. The problem should be approached from the demand side in two ways through policy changes.
First, there should be compliance between doctoral programs and the actual needs of industry. There should be fewer programs whose graduates are not in high demand, and more engineering and business management programs. The government should not put top researchers with doctoral degrees in the proposed training programs, nor should it push them to publish articles in journals listed in the Science Citation Index and the Social Sciences Citation Index, as this takes time away from other activities. There should be cooperation between R&D departments in industry and academia so that Taiwan can compete internationally.
In other countries, many leading corporations are engaged with the international academic community and their researchers are frequently published in top journals. Researchers at IBM, AT&T and at leading Japanese companies have even won Nobel prizes in this way
Therefore, the government’s policy should aim to lift local companies’ R&D ability to international standards, so such skills can be developed. While it is true that some local companies are producing international-standard research, they are still locked in the mentality of small or medium-sized businesses in terms of their R&D. The government should be making it easier for these companies to improve their R&D capabilities through favorable policy changes.
Second, the government should be encouraging companies to invest in advanced R&D, instead of buying technology and processes from overseas companies, as is the norm in the biotech sector. This enables these companies to be listed on the stock market and profit from buying and selling shares. What it does not do is promote development and progress in Taiwan’s biotech industry.
If the government stipulated certain conditions, like requiring a given percentage — say, 50 percent — of R&D staff to have PhDs, world-class patents, or papers published in specialist periodicals, it would help the cultivation and employment of highly educated individuals, and also improve companies’ R&D standards.
Moreover, many Taiwanese companies are using their R&D investments to get tax deductions or exemptions, or to support their applications for the government’s R&D subsidies. The government could require them to employ a certain number of doctoral graduates when they have exceeded a certain amount in tax deductions, exemptions or subsidies. This could improve the quality of domestic companies’ R&D and therefore the industry as a whole. By doing so, a win-win situation could be created and the government would no longer have to provide subsidies for doctoral graduates.
Liang Ting-peng is a national chair professor in the Department of Management Information Systems at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The Olympic Charter in the sixth Fundamental Principles of Olympism prohibits discrimination based on nationality or political opinion. It also requires that the International Olympic Committee (IOC) maintain political neutrality and take action against any form of discrimination affecting the Olympic movement (rules 2.5, 2.6 and 16.1.3). The Japanese Olympic Committeeis required to ensure the observance of the charter and take action against discrimination carried out within Japan (Rule 27.2). The committees are failing to carry out their missions. Athletes from Taiwan are discriminated against on the basis of their nationality, and it must stop. Every country that participates in the
Communist China’s Global Times warned US President Joe Biden in the first week of this month that he “should make a significant response to China’s sincerity within his first 100 days, as the sincerity and patience will not last forever.” In fact, they lasted only days. By the end of the week, Beijing had laid down the law, so to speak, to the Biden administration. First was a speech billed as a “Dialogue with National Committee on US-China Relations,” by Yang Jiechi (楊潔篪), director of China’s Office of the Central Commission for Foreign Affairs. Yang said he was pleased “to have
Three years ago, former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Yeh Yi-jin (葉宜津) raised quite a few eyebrows when she proposed abolishing Taiwan’s zhuyin fuhao (注音符號, Mandarin phonetic symbols commonly known as “Bopomofo”) system in her bid to become Tainan mayor. Yeh did not make it onto the ballot, and it was not clear how she would have begun to implement such a gargantuan change locally. Not only is Bopomofo learned by all schoolchildren in Taiwan, it is the most popular system for typing Chinese in the nation, despite being considered one of the least efficient input methods. Bopomofo has also become
The Canadian parliament on Monday passed a motion saying that China’s human rights abuses against the country’s Uighur Muslim population in Xinjiang constitute “genocide.” Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has so far avoided using the word genocide in regard to Xinjiang, but if he did, it would begin to generate solidarity among G7 nations on the issue — which is something Trudeau has called for. Former US president Donald Trump used the word genocide regarding Xinjiang before leaving office last month, and members of US President Joe Biden’s administration have been pushing for him to make the same declaration, a Reuters report